Docker (supernova123) MCP Server

@supernova123/docker-mcp-server npm v0.4.3

Published by @supernova123 — no publish provenance, so origin is unverified, but the source is public: the repository link below is self-declared yet readable, so you can inspect the code before adopting it.

Docker server with container management, health checks, auto-restart, Compose lifecycle, and log streaming.

Trust grade
B
84/100
Last scanned get badge →
Trust
B · 84/100
Adoption risk for you: the threat score, then adjusted down for blast radius, publisher verification and how much the scan could see. Deterministic; every point is auditable.
Capability
High
Blast radius if it went rogue — what the server’s tools could reach. Independent of trust.
Coverage
Source
How much the scan could actually inspect. Shallow coverage is stated, never hidden.
Share this Trust Score
𝕏 Share LinkedIn Reddit
B Why this grade threat 91 − adoption risk = 84/100

The grade answers one question — how safe is this server for you to adopt — so it is computed in two auditable stages. Nothing below is an opinion or an LLM's guess; every line is a real term the deterministic engine applied, and the same input always yields the same number.

1. Threat score — 100 − 9.5 = 91. What the published surface and source actually contain:

PointsWhat was foundCategory
−9.5 Untrusted input concatenated into a command sink ×2 MTC-SRC-009 injection

2. Client adoption risk — 91 − 7 = 84. Three small, subtract-only factors that reflect your risk in adopting it — a clean scan proves less on a powerful, unverified or barely-inspectable package, so the grade says so plainly:

PointsAdoption-risk factor
−6 capability blast radius (high) — client exposure if the model is manipulated
−1 publisher verification (public source) — no provenance, but the source is public and inspectable

Capability observations and info notes are shown under Findings but never scored. Open any row's finding below for the file, line and evidence behind a deduction.

Findings 10

high Sensitive-source and external-sink co-existMTC-FLOW-004

Tools that read sensitive data ([compose_logs]) and tools that can send data out ([exec_in_container]) are exposed together. An agent can move private data to the sink.

Evidence: sources [compose_logs] → sinks [exec_in_container]

Fix: Keep secret-reading and egress capabilities on separate, separately-approved servers.

Location: flow compose_logs → exec_in_container

high Tool "exec_in_container" exposes command/code executionMTC-CAP-001

Tool "exec_in_container" appears to run shell commands or evaluate code (keyword "exec" in tool name). Arbitrary execution driven by model input is one of the most dangerous MCP capabilities; combined with any untrusted input it becomes RCE.

Fix: Sandbox execution, allowlist commands/arguments, and never pass model output to a shell unescaped.

Location: tool exec_in_container

high Shell/command execution in server code (dist/tools/compose.js)MTC-SRC-002

In the server's implementation (`dist/tools/compose.js:1`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: exec as execCb } from "child_process"; import { existsSync, statSync } from "fs"; import { join } from "path"; import {

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server dist/tools/compose.js

high Shell/command execution in server code (dist/tools/health.js)MTC-SRC-002

In the server's implementation (`dist/tools/health.js:4`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: (checks port open), and exec (runs command inside container). Auto-detects probe type from the container's HEALTHCHECK c

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server dist/tools/health.js

high Shell/command execution in server code (src/tools/compose.ts)MTC-SRC-002

In the server's implementation (`src/tools/compose.ts:1`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: exec as execCb } from "child_process"; import { existsSync, statSync } from "fs"; import { join } from "path"; import {

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server src/tools/compose.ts

high Shell/command execution in server code (src/tools/health.ts)MTC-SRC-002

In the server's implementation (`src/tools/health.ts:9`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: (checks port open), and exec (runs command inside container). Auto-detects probe type from the container's HEALTHCHECK c

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server src/tools/health.ts

medium Untrusted input concatenated into a command sink (dist/tools/compose.js)MTC-SRC-009

In the server's implementation (`dist/tools/compose.js:29`): A shell/process command assembled from concatenated or interpolated values is command injection when any part is attacker-influenced — the OWASP canonical RCE flow. Verify what reaches the interpolated value. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: const result = execSync(`docker compose -f "${filePath}" ${args.join(" ")}`, { encoding: "utf-8",

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server dist/tools/compose.js

medium Untrusted input concatenated into a command sink (src/tools/compose.ts)MTC-SRC-009

In the server's implementation (`src/tools/compose.ts:39`): A shell/process command assembled from concatenated or interpolated values is command injection when any part is attacker-influenced — the OWASP canonical RCE flow. Verify what reaches the interpolated value. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: ry { const result = execSync(`docker compose -f "${filePath}" ${args.join(" ")}`, { encoding: "utf-8", t

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server src/tools/compose.ts

low Mutating tool "exec_in_container" declares no destructiveHintMTC-CAP-005

Tool "exec_in_container" can mutate/egress but declares no destructiveHint. Clients that don't default to spec-safe behavior may not prompt before running it.

Fix: Declare accurate annotations, and gate destructive tools on user confirmation regardless.

Location: tool exec_in_container

low Shell/command execution in packaging/dev tooling (tests/compose.test.ts)MTC-SRC-002

In a packaging/dev/install script (shipped, but not the server runtime) (`tests/compose.test.ts:10`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: vi.fn(), })); vi.mock("child_process", () => ({ execSync: mockExecSync, exec: vi.fn(), })); vi.mock("fs", () => ({

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server tests/compose.test.ts

Tools 52

Each tool and what it can reach — statically extracted from the published source.

  • compose_logsreads sensitive data
  • exec_in_containerruns code / shell
  • build_imageno sensitive capability
  • check_healthno sensitive capability
  • compose_downno sensitive capability
  • compose_psno sensitive capability
  • compose_restartno sensitive capability
  • compose_upno sensitive capability
  • container_health_statusno sensitive capability
  • container_resource_usageno sensitive capability
Show 42 more tools ↓
  • container_statsno sensitive capability
  • copy_from_containerno sensitive capability
  • copy_to_containerno sensitive capability
  • create_containerno sensitive capability
  • create_volumeno sensitive capability
  • disk_usageno sensitive capability
  • docker_infono sensitive capability
  • fleet_statusno sensitive capability
  • inspect_containerno sensitive capability
  • inspect_contextno sensitive capability
  • inspect_volumeno sensitive capability
  • list_containersno sensitive capability
  • list_contextsno sensitive capability
  • list_imagesno sensitive capability
  • list_networksno sensitive capability
  • list_volumesno sensitive capability
  • monitor_dashboardno sensitive capability
  • prune_containersno sensitive capability
  • prune_imagesno sensitive capability
  • prune_volumesno sensitive capability
  • pull_imageno sensitive capability
  • recreate_containerno sensitive capability
  • registry_loginno sensitive capability
  • registry_pushno sensitive capability
  • registry_searchno sensitive capability
  • remove_containerno sensitive capability
  • remove_imageno sensitive capability
  • remove_volumeno sensitive capability
  • resource_alert_checkno sensitive capability
  • restart_containerno sensitive capability
  • run_containerno sensitive capability
  • scan_imageno sensitive capability
  • search_logsno sensitive capability
  • set_restart_policyno sensitive capability
  • start_containerno sensitive capability
  • stop_containerno sensitive capability
  • stream_logsno sensitive capability
  • update_containerno sensitive capability
  • use_contextno sensitive capability
  • vulnerability_reportno sensitive capability
  • watch_eventsno sensitive capability
  • watch_healthno sensitive capability

Toxic flows 1

Cross-tool combinations that form a data-exfiltration primitive (untrusted input → sensitive source → external sink).

What this scan could not see

Versions 1

Scan history per published version. The engine is deterministic — the same version always yields the same score, so a changed score means the package itself changed.

VersionScoreFindingsEngineScanned
v0.4.3 latest B 84/100 10 1.13.0 2026-08-25

Embed this score

Show this server's live Trust Score in your README, docs or website. The badge is served straight from the registry and updates automatically after every rescan — no API key needed. It links back to this page, so anyone who sees the grade can also read the findings behind it instead of taking a number on faith.

MCP Trust Score: B · 84/100
Markdown (GitHub README)
[![MCP Trust Score](https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/supernova123-docker-mcp-server/badge.svg)](https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/supernova123-docker-mcp-server)
HTML
<a href="https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/supernova123-docker-mcp-server"><img src="https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/supernova123-docker-mcp-server/badge.svg" alt="MCP Trust Score" height="20"></a>
Prefer shields.io styling? Point it at https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/supernova123-docker-mcp-server/badge.json via https://img.shields.io/endpoint?url=…

Verify this score yourself

The score above is reproducible: the same package version always yields the same result. Run it locally or over the free API — no account, no LLM, fully deterministic.

npx mcptrustchecker scan @supernova123/docker-mcp-server --online

Use the free API → How scoring works

Other implementations of Docker 14

Independent packages implementing the same tool, scanned with the same engine. Compare all 15 side by side →

More in Cloud & DevOps