Knowledge Keeper MCP Server

@zsc-glitch/knowledge-keeper-mcp npm v1.7.7

Published by @zsc-glitch — no publish provenance, so origin is unverified, but the source is public: the repository link below is self-declared yet readable, so you can inspect the code before adopting it.

AI Memory & Knowledge Management MCP Server — 32 tools, BM25 R@5=95%, hybrid search (RRF), knowledge graph, analytics, cloud sync, Obsidian compatible. Works with Claude Code, Cursor, Gemini CLI, Windsurf, hermes-agent.

Trust grade
A
93/100
Last scanned get badge →
Trust
A · 93/100
Adoption risk for you: the threat score, then adjusted down for blast radius, publisher verification and how much the scan could see. Deterministic; every point is auditable.
Capability
High
Blast radius if it went rogue — what the server’s tools could reach. Independent of trust.
Coverage
Source
How much the scan could actually inspect. Shallow coverage is stated, never hidden.
Share this Trust Score
𝕏 Share LinkedIn Reddit
A Why this grade threat 100 − adoption risk = 93/100

The grade answers one question — how safe is this server for you to adopt — so it is computed in two auditable stages. Nothing below is an opinion or an LLM's guess; every line is a real term the deterministic engine applied, and the same input always yields the same number.

1. Threat score — 100 − 0 = 100. What the published surface and source actually contain:

The deterministic scan raised no scored threat in the surface it inspected — the threat score stayed at 100. Capability observations and advisory notes are recorded but never lower it.

2. Client adoption risk — 100 − 7 = 93. Three small, subtract-only factors that reflect your risk in adopting it — a clean scan proves less on a powerful, unverified or barely-inspectable package, so the grade says so plainly:

PointsAdoption-risk factor
−6 capability blast radius (high) — client exposure if the model is manipulated
−1 publisher verification (public source) — no provenance, but the source is public and inspectable

Capability observations and info notes are shown under Findings but never scored. Open any row's finding below for the file, line and evidence behind a deduction.

Findings 5

high Shell/command execution in server code (hermes-plugin/knowledge-keeper/__init__.py)MTC-SRC-002

In the server's implementation (`hermes-plugin/knowledge-keeper/__init__.py:62`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: self._proc = subprocess.Popen( [MCP_COMMAND, *MCP_ARGS], stdin=subprocess.PIP

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server hermes-plugin/knowledge-keeper/__init__.py

high Shell/command execution in server code (hermes-plugin/knowledge-keeper/cli.py)MTC-SRC-002

In the server's implementation (`hermes-plugin/knowledge-keeper/cli.py:66`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: try: result = subprocess.run( ["npx", "-y", "@zsc-glitch/knowledge-keeper-mcp"], input

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server hermes-plugin/knowledge-keeper/cli.py

medium Hardcoded egress to an external endpoint (dist/cloud-sync.js)MTC-SRC-003

In the server's implementation (`dist/cloud-sync.js:298`): A hardcoded outbound call to a fixed external host inside server code is a classic exfiltration/telemetry channel — especially paired with reads of local data. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: const response = await fetch("https://api.knowledge-keeper.dev/v1/license", { headers: { Authorization: `Be

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server dist/cloud-sync.js

medium Tool "knowledge_unlink" can modify the filesystemMTC-CAP-002

Tool "knowledge_unlink" can write, overwrite or delete files (keyword "unlink" in tool name). Verify it is scoped to a safe directory.

Fix: Constrain file operations to an explicit, non-sensitive root; reject path traversal.

Location: tool knowledge_unlink

low Mutating tool "knowledge_unlink" declares no destructiveHintMTC-CAP-005

Tool "knowledge_unlink" can mutate/egress but declares no destructiveHint. Clients that don't default to spec-safe behavior may not prompt before running it.

Fix: Declare accurate annotations, and gate destructive tools on user confirmation regardless.

Location: tool knowledge_unlink

Tools 33

Each tool and what it can reach — statically extracted from the published source.

  • knowledge_unlinkwrites files
  • knowledge_analytics_insightsno sensitive capability
  • knowledge_analytics_overviewno sensitive capability
  • knowledge_analytics_timelineno sensitive capability
  • knowledge_batchno sensitive capability
  • knowledge_bm25_searchno sensitive capability
  • knowledge_bm25_statsno sensitive capability
  • knowledge_cloud_syncno sensitive capability
  • knowledge_contextno sensitive capability
  • knowledge_deleteno sensitive capability
Show 23 more tools ↓
  • knowledge_duplicatesno sensitive capability
  • knowledge_exportno sensitive capability
  • knowledge_getno sensitive capability
  • knowledge_get_linkedno sensitive capability
  • knowledge_graphno sensitive capability
  • knowledge_graph_buildno sensitive capability
  • knowledge_graph_queryno sensitive capability
  • knowledge_graph_visualizeno sensitive capability
  • knowledge_hybrid_searchno sensitive capability
  • knowledge_importno sensitive capability
  • knowledge_licenseno sensitive capability
  • knowledge_linkno sensitive capability
  • knowledge_mergeno sensitive capability
  • knowledge_recentno sensitive capability
  • knowledge_reviewno sensitive capability
  • knowledge_saveno sensitive capability
  • knowledge_searchno sensitive capability
  • knowledge_semantic_searchno sensitive capability
  • knowledge_syncno sensitive capability
  • knowledge_sync_statusno sensitive capability
  • knowledge_tagsno sensitive capability
  • knowledge_updateno sensitive capability
  • knowledge_versionsno sensitive capability

What this scan could not see

Versions 1

Scan history per published version. The engine is deterministic — the same version always yields the same score, so a changed score means the package itself changed.

VersionScoreFindingsEngineScanned
v1.7.7 latest A 93/100 5 1.13.0 2026-09-07

Embed this score

Show this server's live Trust Score in your README, docs or website. The badge is served straight from the registry and updates automatically after every rescan — no API key needed. It links back to this page, so anyone who sees the grade can also read the findings behind it instead of taking a number on faith.

MCP Trust Score: A · 93/100
Markdown (GitHub README)
[![MCP Trust Score](https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/zsc-glitch-knowledge-keeper-mcp/badge.svg)](https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/zsc-glitch-knowledge-keeper-mcp)
HTML
<a href="https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/zsc-glitch-knowledge-keeper-mcp"><img src="https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/zsc-glitch-knowledge-keeper-mcp/badge.svg" alt="MCP Trust Score" height="20"></a>
Prefer shields.io styling? Point it at https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/zsc-glitch-knowledge-keeper-mcp/badge.json via https://img.shields.io/endpoint?url=…

Verify this score yourself

The score above is reproducible: the same package version always yields the same result. Run it locally or over the free API — no account, no LLM, fully deterministic.

npx mcptrustchecker scan @zsc-glitch/knowledge-keeper-mcp --online

Use the free API → How scoring works

More in AI, Memory & Reasoning