zpl-engine-mcp
npm
v4.3.0
Published by cicicalex — no publish provenance, so origin is unverified, but the source is public: the repository link below is self-declared yet readable, so you can inspect the code before adopting it.
MCP server for the ZPL stability engine — AIN bias detection & neutrality scoring for finance, gaming, AI/ML, security, crypto. 68 tools across 11 categories. Plug into Claude Desktop / Cursor / Windsurf in 10 seconds via `npx zpl-engine-mcp setup`. Free
The grade answers one question — how safe is this server for you to adopt — so it is computed in two auditable stages. Nothing below is an opinion or an LLM's guess; every line is a real term the deterministic engine applied, and the same input always yields the same number.
1. Threat score — 100 − 0 = 100. What the published surface and source actually contain:
The deterministic scan raised no scored threat in the surface it inspected — the threat score stayed at 100. Capability observations and advisory notes are recorded but never lower it.
2. Client adoption risk — 100 − 4 = 96. Three small, subtract-only factors that reflect your risk in adopting it — a clean scan proves less on a powerful, unverified or barely-inspectable package, so the grade says so plainly:
| Points | Adoption-risk factor |
|---|---|
| −3 | capability blast radius (moderate) — client exposure if the model is manipulated |
| −1 | publisher verification (public source) — no provenance, but the source is public and inspectable |
Capability observations and info notes are shown under Findings but never scored.
Open any row's finding below for the file, line and evidence behind a deduction.
In the server's implementation (`dist/eval-client.js:14`): A hardcoded outbound call to a fixed external host inside server code is a classic exfiltration/telemetry channel — especially paired with reads of local data. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.
Evidence: ; const res = await fetch("https://api.anthropic.com/v1/messages", { method: "POST", headers: {
Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.
Location: server dist/eval-client.js
In the server's implementation (`dist/index.js:661`): A hardcoded outbound call to a fixed external host inside server code is a classic exfiltration/telemetry channel — especially paired with reads of local data. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.
Evidence: const res = await fetch("https://registry.npmjs.org/zpl-engine-mcp/latest", { signal: AbortSignal.
Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.
Location: server dist/index.js
In a packaging/dev/install script (shipped, but not the server runtime) (`dist/setup.js:35`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.
Evidence: rt { spawn } from "node:child_process"; import { createInterface } from "node:readline"; import { getMcpPackageVersion }
Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.
Location: server dist/setup.js
Each tool and what it can reach — statically extracted from the published source.
zpl_aboutno sensitive capabilityzpl_accountno sensitive capabilityzpl_alertno sensitive capabilityzpl_analyzeno sensitive capabilityzpl_balance_checkno sensitive capabilityzpl_balance_compareno sensitive capabilityzpl_balance_pairno sensitive capabilityzpl_balance_rankno sensitive capabilityzpl_batchno sensitive capabilityzpl_benchmarkno sensitive capabilityzpl_chartno sensitive capabilityzpl_check_responseno sensitive capabilityzpl_compareno sensitive capabilityzpl_complianceno sensitive capabilityzpl_computeno sensitive capabilityzpl_consistency_testno sensitive capabilityzpl_correlationno sensitive capabilityzpl_dataset_auditno sensitive capabilityzpl_debateno sensitive capabilityzpl_decideno sensitive capabilityzpl_defi_riskno sensitive capabilityzpl_diagnoseno sensitive capabilityzpl_domainsno sensitive capabilityzpl_economy_checkno sensitive capabilityzpl_emotional_stabilityno sensitive capabilityzpl_explainno sensitive capabilityzpl_exportno sensitive capabilityzpl_fear_greedno sensitive capabilityzpl_forex_pairno sensitive capabilityzpl_gacha_auditno sensitive capabilityzpl_hallucination_consistencyno sensitive capabilityzpl_healthno sensitive capabilityzpl_historyno sensitive capabilityzpl_language_equityno sensitive capabilityzpl_leaderboardno sensitive capabilityzpl_liquidityno sensitive capabilityzpl_loot_tableno sensitive capabilityzpl_macrono sensitive capabilityzpl_market_scanno sensitive capabilityzpl_matchmakingno sensitive capabilityzpl_matrixno sensitive capabilityzpl_model_biasno sensitive capabilityzpl_news_biasno sensitive capabilityzpl_persona_driftno sensitive capabilityzpl_plansno sensitive capabilityzpl_portfoliono sensitive capabilityzpl_prompt_testno sensitive capabilityzpl_pvp_balanceno sensitive capabilityzpl_quotano sensitive capabilityzpl_rankno sensitive capabilityzpl_refusal_balanceno sensitive capabilityzpl_reportno sensitive capabilityzpl_review_biasno sensitive capabilityzpl_risk_scoreno sensitive capabilityzpl_rng_testno sensitive capabilityzpl_safety_boundaryno sensitive capabilityzpl_score_onlyno sensitive capabilityzpl_sector_biasno sensitive capabilityzpl_simulateno sensitive capabilityzpl_sweepno sensitive capabilityzpl_sycophancy_scoreno sensitive capabilityzpl_teachno sensitive capabilityzpl_tokenomicsno sensitive capabilityzpl_usageno sensitive capabilityzpl_validate_inputno sensitive capabilityzpl_versusno sensitive capabilityzpl_vuln_mapno sensitive capabilityzpl_watchlistno sensitive capabilityzpl_whale_checkno sensitive capabilityScan history per published version. The engine is deterministic — the same version always yields the same score, so a changed score means the package itself changed.
| Version | Score | Findings | Engine | Scanned |
|---|---|---|---|---|
v4.3.0 latest |
A 96/100 | 3 | 1.13.0 | 2026-09-07 |
v4.2.1 |
A 96/100 | 3 | 1.12.1 | 2026-08-02 |
Show this server's live Trust Score in your README, docs or website. The badge is served straight from the registry and updates automatically after every rescan — no API key needed. It links back to this page, so anyone who sees the grade can also read the findings behind it instead of taking a number on faith.
The score above is reproducible: the same package version always yields the same result. Run it locally or over the free API — no account, no LLM, fully deterministic.
npx mcptrustchecker scan zpl-engine-mcp --online
The Stripe Agent Toolkit enables popular agent frameworks including LangChain and Vercel's AI SDK to integrate with Stripe APIs through function calling.
MCP (Model Context Protocol) server for AgentGate. Enables Claude and other MCP-compatible AI assistants to request approvals.
Scan any website for AI agent readiness, payment protocols, and discovery endpoints
MCP server for aigently security guardrails — reads static catalog-data JSON, zero API dependency
Governed threat modeling, code threat verification, traceability & compliance, as MCP tools.
Governed threat modeling, code threat verification, traceability & compliance, as MCP tools.