Zpl Engine MCP Server

zpl-engine-mcp npm v4.3.0

Published by cicicalex — no publish provenance, so origin is unverified, but the source is public: the repository link below is self-declared yet readable, so you can inspect the code before adopting it.

MCP server for the ZPL stability engine — AIN bias detection & neutrality scoring for finance, gaming, AI/ML, security, crypto. 68 tools across 11 categories. Plug into Claude Desktop / Cursor / Windsurf in 10 seconds via `npx zpl-engine-mcp setup`. Free

Trust grade
A
96/100
Last scanned get badge →
Trust
A · 96/100
Adoption risk for you: the threat score, then adjusted down for blast radius, publisher verification and how much the scan could see. Deterministic; every point is auditable.
Capability
Moderate
Blast radius if it went rogue — what the server’s tools could reach. Independent of trust.
Coverage
Source
How much the scan could actually inspect. Shallow coverage is stated, never hidden.
Share this Trust Score
𝕏 Share LinkedIn Reddit
A Why this grade threat 100 − adoption risk = 96/100

The grade answers one question — how safe is this server for you to adopt — so it is computed in two auditable stages. Nothing below is an opinion or an LLM's guess; every line is a real term the deterministic engine applied, and the same input always yields the same number.

1. Threat score — 100 − 0 = 100. What the published surface and source actually contain:

The deterministic scan raised no scored threat in the surface it inspected — the threat score stayed at 100. Capability observations and advisory notes are recorded but never lower it.

2. Client adoption risk — 100 − 4 = 96. Three small, subtract-only factors that reflect your risk in adopting it — a clean scan proves less on a powerful, unverified or barely-inspectable package, so the grade says so plainly:

PointsAdoption-risk factor
−3 capability blast radius (moderate) — client exposure if the model is manipulated
−1 publisher verification (public source) — no provenance, but the source is public and inspectable

Capability observations and info notes are shown under Findings but never scored. Open any row's finding below for the file, line and evidence behind a deduction.

Findings 3

medium Hardcoded egress to an external endpoint (dist/eval-client.js)MTC-SRC-003

In the server's implementation (`dist/eval-client.js:14`): A hardcoded outbound call to a fixed external host inside server code is a classic exfiltration/telemetry channel — especially paired with reads of local data. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: ; const res = await fetch("https://api.anthropic.com/v1/messages", { method: "POST", headers: {

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server dist/eval-client.js

medium Hardcoded egress to an external endpoint (dist/index.js)MTC-SRC-003

In the server's implementation (`dist/index.js:661`): A hardcoded outbound call to a fixed external host inside server code is a classic exfiltration/telemetry channel — especially paired with reads of local data. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: const res = await fetch("https://registry.npmjs.org/zpl-engine-mcp/latest", { signal: AbortSignal.

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server dist/index.js

low Shell/command execution in packaging/dev tooling (dist/setup.js)MTC-SRC-002

In a packaging/dev/install script (shipped, but not the server runtime) (`dist/setup.js:35`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: rt { spawn } from "node:child_process"; import { createInterface } from "node:readline"; import { getMcpPackageVersion }

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server dist/setup.js

Tools 69

Each tool and what it can reach — statically extracted from the published source.

  • zpl_aboutno sensitive capability
  • zpl_accountno sensitive capability
  • zpl_alertno sensitive capability
  • zpl_analyzeno sensitive capability
  • zpl_balance_checkno sensitive capability
  • zpl_balance_compareno sensitive capability
  • zpl_balance_pairno sensitive capability
  • zpl_balance_rankno sensitive capability
  • zpl_batchno sensitive capability
  • zpl_benchmarkno sensitive capability
Show 59 more tools ↓
  • zpl_chartno sensitive capability
  • zpl_check_responseno sensitive capability
  • zpl_compareno sensitive capability
  • zpl_complianceno sensitive capability
  • zpl_computeno sensitive capability
  • zpl_consistency_testno sensitive capability
  • zpl_correlationno sensitive capability
  • zpl_dataset_auditno sensitive capability
  • zpl_debateno sensitive capability
  • zpl_decideno sensitive capability
  • zpl_defi_riskno sensitive capability
  • zpl_diagnoseno sensitive capability
  • zpl_domainsno sensitive capability
  • zpl_economy_checkno sensitive capability
  • zpl_emotional_stabilityno sensitive capability
  • zpl_explainno sensitive capability
  • zpl_exportno sensitive capability
  • zpl_fear_greedno sensitive capability
  • zpl_forex_pairno sensitive capability
  • zpl_gacha_auditno sensitive capability
  • zpl_hallucination_consistencyno sensitive capability
  • zpl_healthno sensitive capability
  • zpl_historyno sensitive capability
  • zpl_language_equityno sensitive capability
  • zpl_leaderboardno sensitive capability
  • zpl_liquidityno sensitive capability
  • zpl_loot_tableno sensitive capability
  • zpl_macrono sensitive capability
  • zpl_market_scanno sensitive capability
  • zpl_matchmakingno sensitive capability
  • zpl_matrixno sensitive capability
  • zpl_model_biasno sensitive capability
  • zpl_news_biasno sensitive capability
  • zpl_persona_driftno sensitive capability
  • zpl_plansno sensitive capability
  • zpl_portfoliono sensitive capability
  • zpl_prompt_testno sensitive capability
  • zpl_pvp_balanceno sensitive capability
  • zpl_quotano sensitive capability
  • zpl_rankno sensitive capability
  • zpl_refusal_balanceno sensitive capability
  • zpl_reportno sensitive capability
  • zpl_review_biasno sensitive capability
  • zpl_risk_scoreno sensitive capability
  • zpl_rng_testno sensitive capability
  • zpl_safety_boundaryno sensitive capability
  • zpl_score_onlyno sensitive capability
  • zpl_sector_biasno sensitive capability
  • zpl_simulateno sensitive capability
  • zpl_sweepno sensitive capability
  • zpl_sycophancy_scoreno sensitive capability
  • zpl_teachno sensitive capability
  • zpl_tokenomicsno sensitive capability
  • zpl_usageno sensitive capability
  • zpl_validate_inputno sensitive capability
  • zpl_versusno sensitive capability
  • zpl_vuln_mapno sensitive capability
  • zpl_watchlistno sensitive capability
  • zpl_whale_checkno sensitive capability

What this scan could not see

Versions 2

Scan history per published version. The engine is deterministic — the same version always yields the same score, so a changed score means the package itself changed.

VersionScoreFindingsEngineScanned
v4.3.0 latest A 96/100 3 1.13.0 2026-09-07
v4.2.1 A 96/100 3 1.12.1 2026-08-02

Embed this score

Show this server's live Trust Score in your README, docs or website. The badge is served straight from the registry and updates automatically after every rescan — no API key needed. It links back to this page, so anyone who sees the grade can also read the findings behind it instead of taking a number on faith.

MCP Trust Score: A · 96/100
Markdown (GitHub README)
[![MCP Trust Score](https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/zpl-engine-mcp/badge.svg)](https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/zpl-engine-mcp)
HTML
<a href="https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/zpl-engine-mcp"><img src="https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/zpl-engine-mcp/badge.svg" alt="MCP Trust Score" height="20"></a>
Prefer shields.io styling? Point it at https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/zpl-engine-mcp/badge.json via https://img.shields.io/endpoint?url=…

Verify this score yourself

The score above is reproducible: the same package version always yields the same result. Run it locally or over the free API — no account, no LLM, fully deterministic.

npx mcptrustchecker scan zpl-engine-mcp --online

Use the free API → How scoring works

More in Security & Testing