Zendesk (michaelrice) MCP Server

zendesk-mcp PyPI v0.1.4

Published by michaelrice — no publish provenance, so origin is unverified, but the source is public: the repository link below is self-declared yet readable, so you can inspect the code before adopting it.

Zendesk MCP server for Claude Code and other MCP clients

Trust grade
A
96/100
Last scanned get badge →
Trust
A · 96/100
Adoption risk for you: the threat score, then adjusted down for blast radius, publisher verification and how much the scan could see. Deterministic; every point is auditable.
Capability
Moderate
Blast radius if it went rogue — what the server’s tools could reach. Independent of trust.
Coverage
Source
How much the scan could actually inspect. Shallow coverage is stated, never hidden.
Share this Trust Score
𝕏 Share LinkedIn Reddit
A Why this grade threat 100 − adoption risk = 96/100

The grade answers one question — how safe is this server for you to adopt — so it is computed in two auditable stages. Nothing below is an opinion or an LLM's guess; every line is a real term the deterministic engine applied, and the same input always yields the same number.

1. Threat score — 100 − 0 = 100. What the published surface and source actually contain:

The deterministic scan raised no scored threat in the surface it inspected — the threat score stayed at 100. Capability observations and advisory notes are recorded but never lower it.

2. Client adoption risk — 100 − 4 = 96. Three small, subtract-only factors that reflect your risk in adopting it — a clean scan proves less on a powerful, unverified or barely-inspectable package, so the grade says so plainly:

PointsAdoption-risk factor
−3 capability blast radius (moderate) — client exposure if the model is manipulated
−1 publisher verification (public source) — no provenance, but the source is public and inspectable

Capability observations and info notes are shown under Findings but never scored. Open any row's finding below for the file, line and evidence behind a deduction.

Findings 1

low Shell/command execution in packaging/dev tooling (.github/scripts/smoke_test.py)MTC-SRC-002

In a packaging/dev/install script (shipped, but not the server runtime) (`.github/scripts/smoke_test.py:53`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: flush=True) proc = subprocess.Popen( command, stdin=subprocess.PIPE, stdout=subprocess.PIPE

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server .github/scripts/smoke_test.py

Tools 29

Each tool and what it can reach — statically extracted from the published source.

  • zendesk_download_attachmentingests untrusted input
  • zendesk_get_commentsingests untrusted input
  • zendesk_get_organizationingests untrusted input
  • zendesk_list_attachmentsingests untrusted input
  • zendesk_add_tagno sensitive capability
  • zendesk_apply_macrono sensitive capability
  • zendesk_assign_ticketno sensitive capability
  • zendesk_create_ticketno sensitive capability
  • zendesk_get_git_zen_linksno sensitive capability
  • zendesk_get_group_usersno sensitive capability
Show 19 more tools ↓
  • zendesk_get_groupsno sensitive capability
  • zendesk_get_ticketno sensitive capability
  • zendesk_get_ticketsno sensitive capability
  • zendesk_get_time_trackingno sensitive capability
  • zendesk_get_viewno sensitive capability
  • zendesk_get_view_ticketsno sensitive capability
  • zendesk_list_custom_statusesno sensitive capability
  • zendesk_list_macrosno sensitive capability
  • zendesk_list_viewsno sensitive capability
  • zendesk_log_timeno sensitive capability
  • zendesk_post_commentno sensitive capability
  • zendesk_post_internal_noteno sensitive capability
  • zendesk_preview_macrono sensitive capability
  • zendesk_remove_tagno sensitive capability
  • zendesk_search_ticketsno sensitive capability
  • zendesk_search_usersno sensitive capability
  • zendesk_set_ticket_statusno sensitive capability
  • zendesk_ticket_to_gitlab_contextno sensitive capability
  • zendesk_update_ticketno sensitive capability

What this scan could not see

Versions 3

Scan history per published version. The engine is deterministic — the same version always yields the same score, so a changed score means the package itself changed.

VersionScoreFindingsEngineScanned
v0.1.4 latest A 96/100 1 1.13.0 2026-08-25
v0.1.3 A 96/100 1 1.12.1 2026-08-12
v0.1.2 A 96/100 0 1.12.1 2026-07-27

Embed this score

Show this server's live Trust Score in your README, docs or website. The badge is served straight from the registry and updates automatically after every rescan — no API key needed. It links back to this page, so anyone who sees the grade can also read the findings behind it instead of taking a number on faith.

MCP Trust Score: A · 96/100
Markdown (GitHub README)
[![MCP Trust Score](https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/zendesk-mcp-2/badge.svg)](https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/zendesk-mcp-2)
HTML
<a href="https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/zendesk-mcp-2"><img src="https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/zendesk-mcp-2/badge.svg" alt="MCP Trust Score" height="20"></a>
Prefer shields.io styling? Point it at https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/zendesk-mcp-2/badge.json via https://img.shields.io/endpoint?url=…

Verify this score yourself

The score above is reproducible: the same package version always yields the same result. Run it locally or over the free API — no account, no LLM, fully deterministic.

npx mcptrustchecker scan zendesk-mcp --online --registry pypi

Use the free API → How scoring works

Other implementations of Zendesk 8

Independent packages implementing the same tool, scanned with the same engine. Compare all 9 side by side →

More in Business & CRM