Android Dev (tanguito) MCP Server

@tanguito/android-dev-mcp npm v1.2.0

Published by @tanguito — no publish provenance, so origin is unverified, but the source is public: the repository link below is self-declared yet readable, so you can inspect the code before adopting it.

Generic Android automation and inspection MCP server powered by ADB.

Trust grade
A
93/100
Last scanned get badge →
Trust
A · 93/100
Adoption risk for you: the threat score, then adjusted down for blast radius, publisher verification and how much the scan could see. Deterministic; every point is auditable.
Capability
High
Blast radius if it went rogue — what the server’s tools could reach. Independent of trust.
Coverage
Source
How much the scan could actually inspect. Shallow coverage is stated, never hidden.
Share this Trust Score
𝕏 Share LinkedIn Reddit
A Why this grade threat 100 − adoption risk = 93/100

The grade answers one question — how safe is this server for you to adopt — so it is computed in two auditable stages. Nothing below is an opinion or an LLM's guess; every line is a real term the deterministic engine applied, and the same input always yields the same number.

1. Threat score — 100 − 0 = 100. What the published surface and source actually contain:

The deterministic scan raised no scored threat in the surface it inspected — the threat score stayed at 100. Capability observations and advisory notes are recorded but never lower it.

2. Client adoption risk — 100 − 7 = 93. Three small, subtract-only factors that reflect your risk in adopting it — a clean scan proves less on a powerful, unverified or barely-inspectable package, so the grade says so plainly:

PointsAdoption-risk factor
−6 capability blast radius (high) — client exposure if the model is manipulated
−1 publisher verification (public source) — no provenance, but the source is public and inspectable

Capability observations and info notes are shown under Findings but never scored. Open any row's finding below for the file, line and evidence behind a deduction.

Findings 6

high Sensitive-source and external-sink co-existMTC-FLOW-004

Tools that read sensitive data ([android_find_ui, android_session_step, android_ui_dump]) and tools that can send data out ([android_run_shell]) are exposed together. An agent can move private data to the sink.

Evidence: sources [android_find_ui, android_session_step, android_ui_dump] → sinks [android_run_shell]

Fix: Keep secret-reading and egress capabilities on separate, separately-approved servers.

Location: flow android_find_ui → android_run_shell

high Tool "android_run_shell" exposes command/code executionMTC-CAP-001

Tool "android_run_shell" appears to run shell commands or evaluate code (keyword "shell" in tool name, parameter "command"). Arbitrary execution driven by model input is one of the most dangerous MCP capabilities; combined with any untrusted input it becomes RCE.

Fix: Sandbox execution, allowlist commands/arguments, and never pass model output to a shell unescaped.

Location: tool android_run_shell

high Shell/command execution in server code (dist/adb.js)MTC-SRC-002

In the server's implementation (`dist/adb.js:1`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: { execFile } from "node:child_process"; import { promisify } from "node:util"; import { formatContractError } from "./er

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server dist/adb.js

medium Unconstrained command parameter "command" on "android_run_shell"MTC-CAP-006

Tool "android_run_shell" takes a command-shaped parameter "command" with no enum/pattern constraint. Free-form, model- or attacker-controlled arguments reaching a shell is the command-injection precondition.

Fix: Constrain the parameter (enum/pattern), or build the command from a fixed template with escaped args.

Location: tool android_run_shell · inputSchema.properties.command

low Mutating tool "android_run_shell" declares no destructiveHintMTC-CAP-005

Tool "android_run_shell" can mutate/egress but declares no destructiveHint. Clients that don't default to spec-safe behavior may not prompt before running it.

Fix: Declare accurate annotations, and gate destructive tools on user confirmation regardless.

Location: tool android_run_shell

low Shell/command execution in packaging/dev tooling (scripts/doctor.js)MTC-SRC-002

In a packaging/dev/install script (shipped, but not the server runtime) (`scripts/doctor.js:2`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: { execFile } from "node:child_process"; import { existsSync } from "node:fs"; import { readFile } from "node:fs/promises

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server scripts/doctor.js

Tools 41

Each tool and what it can reach — statically extracted from the published source.

  • android_find_uireads sensitive data
  • android_run_shellruns code / shell
  • android_session_stepreads sensitive data
  • android_ui_dumpreads sensitive data
  • adb_devicesno sensitive capability
  • android_app_infono sensitive capability
  • android_capture_stateno sensitive capability
  • android_clear_app_datano sensitive capability
  • android_clear_logcatno sensitive capability
  • android_current_appno sensitive capability
Show 31 more tools ↓
  • android_device_infono sensitive capability
  • android_force_stop_appno sensitive capability
  • android_generate_reportno sensitive capability
  • android_get_session_reportno sensitive capability
  • android_input_textno sensitive capability
  • android_install_apkno sensitive capability
  • android_launch_appno sensitive capability
  • android_list_appsno sensitive capability
  • android_list_packagesno sensitive capability
  • android_list_sessionsno sensitive capability
  • android_list_workflowsno sensitive capability
  • android_manage_permissionsno sensitive capability
  • android_open_app_settingsno sensitive capability
  • android_read_logcatno sensitive capability
  • android_record_videono sensitive capability
  • android_run_workflowno sensitive capability
  • android_screenshotno sensitive capability
  • android_send_debug_intentno sensitive capability
  • android_send_intentno sensitive capability
  • android_set_bluetoothno sensitive capability
  • android_set_volumeno sensitive capability
  • android_start_activityno sensitive capability
  • android_start_sessionno sensitive capability
  • android_stop_sessionno sensitive capability
  • android_swipeno sensitive capability
  • android_tapno sensitive capability
  • android_tap_resourceno sensitive capability
  • android_tap_textno sensitive capability
  • android_tap_uino sensitive capability
  • android_uninstall_appno sensitive capability
  • android_wait_for_uino sensitive capability

Toxic flows 1

Cross-tool combinations that form a data-exfiltration primitive (untrusted input → sensitive source → external sink).

What this scan could not see

Versions 1

Scan history per published version. The engine is deterministic — the same version always yields the same score, so a changed score means the package itself changed.

VersionScoreFindingsEngineScanned
v1.2.0 latest A 93/100 6 1.13.0 2026-09-07

Embed this score

Show this server's live Trust Score in your README, docs or website. The badge is served straight from the registry and updates automatically after every rescan — no API key needed. It links back to this page, so anyone who sees the grade can also read the findings behind it instead of taking a number on faith.

MCP Trust Score: A · 93/100
Markdown (GitHub README)
[![MCP Trust Score](https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/tanguito-android-dev-mcp/badge.svg)](https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/tanguito-android-dev-mcp)
HTML
<a href="https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/tanguito-android-dev-mcp"><img src="https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/tanguito-android-dev-mcp/badge.svg" alt="MCP Trust Score" height="20"></a>
Prefer shields.io styling? Point it at https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/tanguito-android-dev-mcp/badge.json via https://img.shields.io/endpoint?url=…

Verify this score yourself

The score above is reproducible: the same package version always yields the same result. Run it locally or over the free API — no account, no LLM, fully deterministic.

npx mcptrustchecker scan @tanguito/android-dev-mcp --online

Use the free API → How scoring works

Other implementations of Android Dev 2

Independent packages implementing the same tool, scanned with the same engine. Compare all 3 side by side →

More in Developer Tools