Storymapper MCP Server

storymapper npm v1.0.1

Published by tomatap — no publish provenance, so origin is unverified, but the source is public: the repository link below is self-declared yet readable, so you can inspect the code before adopting it.

User Story Map + Kanban board with a live HTTP/WebSocket UI and an MCP server, so AI agents and humans plan the same backlog together.

Trust grade
A
93/100
Last scanned get badge →
Trust
A · 93/100
Adoption risk for you: the threat score, then adjusted down for blast radius, publisher verification and how much the scan could see. Deterministic; every point is auditable.
Capability
High
Blast radius if it went rogue — what the server’s tools could reach. Independent of trust.
Coverage
Source
How much the scan could actually inspect. Shallow coverage is stated, never hidden.
Share this Trust Score
𝕏 Share LinkedIn Reddit
A Why this grade threat 100 − adoption risk = 93/100

The grade answers one question — how safe is this server for you to adopt — so it is computed in two auditable stages. Nothing below is an opinion or an LLM's guess; every line is a real term the deterministic engine applied, and the same input always yields the same number.

1. Threat score — 100 − 0 = 100. What the published surface and source actually contain:

The deterministic scan raised no scored threat in the surface it inspected — the threat score stayed at 100. Capability observations and advisory notes are recorded but never lower it.

2. Client adoption risk — 100 − 7 = 93. Three small, subtract-only factors that reflect your risk in adopting it — a clean scan proves less on a powerful, unverified or barely-inspectable package, so the grade says so plainly:

PointsAdoption-risk factor
−6 capability blast radius (high) — client exposure if the model is manipulated
−1 publisher verification (public source) — no provenance, but the source is public and inspectable

Capability observations and info notes are shown under Findings but never scored. Open any row's finding below for the file, line and evidence behind a deduction.

Findings 10

high Tool "test_exec_start" exposes command/code executionMTC-CAP-001

Tool "test_exec_start" appears to run shell commands or evaluate code (keyword "exec" in tool name). Arbitrary execution driven by model input is one of the most dangerous MCP capabilities; combined with any untrusted input it becomes RCE.

Fix: Sandbox execution, allowlist commands/arguments, and never pass model output to a shell unescaped.

Location: tool test_exec_start

high Tool "test_exec_record" exposes command/code executionMTC-CAP-001

Tool "test_exec_record" appears to run shell commands or evaluate code (keyword "exec" in tool name). Arbitrary execution driven by model input is one of the most dangerous MCP capabilities; combined with any untrusted input it becomes RCE.

Fix: Sandbox execution, allowlist commands/arguments, and never pass model output to a shell unescaped.

Location: tool test_exec_record

high Tool "test_exec_set_outcome" exposes command/code executionMTC-CAP-001

Tool "test_exec_set_outcome" appears to run shell commands or evaluate code (keyword "exec" in tool name). Arbitrary execution driven by model input is one of the most dangerous MCP capabilities; combined with any untrusted input it becomes RCE.

Fix: Sandbox execution, allowlist commands/arguments, and never pass model output to a shell unescaped.

Location: tool test_exec_set_outcome

high Tool "test_exec_history" exposes command/code executionMTC-CAP-001

Tool "test_exec_history" appears to run shell commands or evaluate code (keyword "exec" in tool name). Arbitrary execution driven by model input is one of the most dangerous MCP capabilities; combined with any untrusted input it becomes RCE.

Fix: Sandbox execution, allowlist commands/arguments, and never pass model output to a shell unescaped.

Location: tool test_exec_history

high Shell/command execution in server code (server/server.js)MTC-SRC-002

In the server's implementation (`server/server.js:365`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: { execSync } = require("child_process"); const repoRoot = path.resolve(__dirname, ".."); let commit = "unknown",

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server server/server.js

medium Untrusted input can drive an external actionMTC-FLOW-005

Untrusted-input tools ([get_revision]) co-exist with external-action tools ([test_exec_start, test_exec_record, test_exec_set_outcome, test_exec_history]). A prompt injection could cause unwanted external actions, though no direct sensitive-data leak path was found.

Evidence: untrusted [get_revision] → sinks [test_exec_start, test_exec_record, test_exec_set_outcome, test_exec_history]

Fix: Require confirmation for state-changing/egress actions triggered after processing untrusted content.

Location: flow get_revision → test_exec_start

low Mutating tool "test_exec_start" declares no destructiveHintMTC-CAP-005

Tool "test_exec_start" can mutate/egress but declares no destructiveHint. Clients that don't default to spec-safe behavior may not prompt before running it.

Fix: Declare accurate annotations, and gate destructive tools on user confirmation regardless.

Location: tool test_exec_start

low Mutating tool "test_exec_record" declares no destructiveHintMTC-CAP-005

Tool "test_exec_record" can mutate/egress but declares no destructiveHint. Clients that don't default to spec-safe behavior may not prompt before running it.

Fix: Declare accurate annotations, and gate destructive tools on user confirmation regardless.

Location: tool test_exec_record

low Mutating tool "test_exec_set_outcome" declares no destructiveHintMTC-CAP-005

Tool "test_exec_set_outcome" can mutate/egress but declares no destructiveHint. Clients that don't default to spec-safe behavior may not prompt before running it.

Fix: Declare accurate annotations, and gate destructive tools on user confirmation regardless.

Location: tool test_exec_set_outcome

low Mutating tool "test_exec_history" declares no destructiveHintMTC-CAP-005

Tool "test_exec_history" can mutate/egress but declares no destructiveHint. Clients that don't default to spec-safe behavior may not prompt before running it.

Fix: Declare accurate annotations, and gate destructive tools on user confirmation regardless.

Location: tool test_exec_history

Tools 70

Each tool and what it can reach — statically extracted from the published source.

  • get_revisioningests untrusted input
  • test_exec_historyruns code / shell
  • test_exec_recordruns code / shell
  • test_exec_set_outcomeruns code / shell
  • test_exec_startruns code / shell
  • attachment_deleteno sensitive capability
  • attachment_getno sensitive capability
  • attachment_listno sensitive capability
  • attachment_putno sensitive capability
  • bulk_change_statusno sensitive capability
Show 60 more tools ↓
  • bulk_link_createno sensitive capability
  • bulk_ticket_updateno sensitive capability
  • cancel_ticketno sensitive capability
  • change_ticket_statusno sensitive capability
  • complete_ticketno sensitive capability
  • derive_test_definitionno sensitive capability
  • export_projectno sensitive capability
  • generate_product_docno sensitive capability
  • get_configno sensitive capability
  • get_drift_reportno sensitive capability
  • get_trace_coverageno sensitive capability
  • import_ticketsno sensitive capability
  • ingest_slice_candidatesno sensitive capability
  • link_createno sensitive capability
  • link_deleteno sensitive capability
  • list_links_for_ticketno sensitive capability
  • list_process_stepsno sensitive capability
  • list_projectsno sensitive capability
  • list_releasesno sensitive capability
  • list_revisionsno sensitive capability
  • list_ticketsno sensitive capability
  • mark_readyno sensitive capability
  • next_actionableno sensitive capability
  • process_step_createno sensitive capability
  • process_step_deleteno sensitive capability
  • process_step_updateno sensitive capability
  • project_createno sensitive capability
  • project_deleteno sensitive capability
  • project_getno sensitive capability
  • project_updateno sensitive capability
  • publish_test_definitionno sensitive capability
  • query_ticketsno sensitive capability
  • release_createno sensitive capability
  • release_deleteno sensitive capability
  • release_updateno sensitive capability
  • reopen_test_definitionno sensitive capability
  • reorderno sensitive capability
  • request_switch_projectno sensitive capability
  • requirement_createno sensitive capability
  • requirement_listno sensitive capability
  • resolve_definitions_for_ticketno sensitive capability
  • restore_revisionno sensitive capability
  • set_checklist_itemno sensitive capability
  • set_configno sensitive capability
  • spec_module_createno sensitive capability
  • split_process_stepno sensitive capability
  • test_def_prereq_addno sensitive capability
  • test_def_prereq_checkno sensitive capability
  • test_def_prereq_removeno sensitive capability
  • test_def_prereq_uncheckno sensitive capability
  • test_def_prereq_updateno sensitive capability
  • test_def_step_addno sensitive capability
  • test_def_step_removeno sensitive capability
  • test_def_step_reorderno sensitive capability
  • test_def_step_updateno sensitive capability
  • ticket_createno sensitive capability
  • ticket_deleteno sensitive capability
  • ticket_getno sensitive capability
  • ticket_updateno sensitive capability
  • update_test_definition_metadatano sensitive capability

Toxic flows 1

Cross-tool combinations that form a data-exfiltration primitive (untrusted input → sensitive source → external sink).

What this scan could not see

Versions 1

Scan history per published version. The engine is deterministic — the same version always yields the same score, so a changed score means the package itself changed.

VersionScoreFindingsEngineScanned
v1.0.1 latest A 93/100 10 1.13.0 2026-09-07

Embed this score

Show this server's live Trust Score in your README, docs or website. The badge is served straight from the registry and updates automatically after every rescan — no API key needed. It links back to this page, so anyone who sees the grade can also read the findings behind it instead of taking a number on faith.

MCP Trust Score: A · 93/100
Markdown (GitHub README)
[![MCP Trust Score](https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/storymapper/badge.svg)](https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/storymapper)
HTML
<a href="https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/storymapper"><img src="https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/storymapper/badge.svg" alt="MCP Trust Score" height="20"></a>
Prefer shields.io styling? Point it at https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/storymapper/badge.json via https://img.shields.io/endpoint?url=…

Verify this score yourself

The score above is reproducible: the same package version always yields the same result. Run it locally or over the free API — no account, no LLM, fully deterministic.

npx mcptrustchecker scan storymapper --online

Use the free API → How scoring works

More in Productivity & Workflow