storymapper
npm
v1.0.1
Published by tomatap — no publish provenance, so origin is unverified, but the source is public: the repository link below is self-declared yet readable, so you can inspect the code before adopting it.
User Story Map + Kanban board with a live HTTP/WebSocket UI and an MCP server, so AI agents and humans plan the same backlog together.
The grade answers one question — how safe is this server for you to adopt — so it is computed in two auditable stages. Nothing below is an opinion or an LLM's guess; every line is a real term the deterministic engine applied, and the same input always yields the same number.
1. Threat score — 100 − 0 = 100. What the published surface and source actually contain:
The deterministic scan raised no scored threat in the surface it inspected — the threat score stayed at 100. Capability observations and advisory notes are recorded but never lower it.
2. Client adoption risk — 100 − 7 = 93. Three small, subtract-only factors that reflect your risk in adopting it — a clean scan proves less on a powerful, unverified or barely-inspectable package, so the grade says so plainly:
| Points | Adoption-risk factor |
|---|---|
| −6 | capability blast radius (high) — client exposure if the model is manipulated |
| −1 | publisher verification (public source) — no provenance, but the source is public and inspectable |
Capability observations and info notes are shown under Findings but never scored.
Open any row's finding below for the file, line and evidence behind a deduction.
Tool "test_exec_start" appears to run shell commands or evaluate code (keyword "exec" in tool name). Arbitrary execution driven by model input is one of the most dangerous MCP capabilities; combined with any untrusted input it becomes RCE.
Fix: Sandbox execution, allowlist commands/arguments, and never pass model output to a shell unescaped.
Location: tool test_exec_start
Tool "test_exec_record" appears to run shell commands or evaluate code (keyword "exec" in tool name). Arbitrary execution driven by model input is one of the most dangerous MCP capabilities; combined with any untrusted input it becomes RCE.
Fix: Sandbox execution, allowlist commands/arguments, and never pass model output to a shell unescaped.
Location: tool test_exec_record
Tool "test_exec_set_outcome" appears to run shell commands or evaluate code (keyword "exec" in tool name). Arbitrary execution driven by model input is one of the most dangerous MCP capabilities; combined with any untrusted input it becomes RCE.
Fix: Sandbox execution, allowlist commands/arguments, and never pass model output to a shell unescaped.
Location: tool test_exec_set_outcome
Tool "test_exec_history" appears to run shell commands or evaluate code (keyword "exec" in tool name). Arbitrary execution driven by model input is one of the most dangerous MCP capabilities; combined with any untrusted input it becomes RCE.
Fix: Sandbox execution, allowlist commands/arguments, and never pass model output to a shell unescaped.
Location: tool test_exec_history
In the server's implementation (`server/server.js:365`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.
Evidence: { execSync } = require("child_process"); const repoRoot = path.resolve(__dirname, ".."); let commit = "unknown",
Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.
Location: server server/server.js
Untrusted-input tools ([get_revision]) co-exist with external-action tools ([test_exec_start, test_exec_record, test_exec_set_outcome, test_exec_history]). A prompt injection could cause unwanted external actions, though no direct sensitive-data leak path was found.
Evidence: untrusted [get_revision] → sinks [test_exec_start, test_exec_record, test_exec_set_outcome, test_exec_history]
Fix: Require confirmation for state-changing/egress actions triggered after processing untrusted content.
Location: flow get_revision → test_exec_start
Tool "test_exec_start" can mutate/egress but declares no destructiveHint. Clients that don't default to spec-safe behavior may not prompt before running it.
Fix: Declare accurate annotations, and gate destructive tools on user confirmation regardless.
Location: tool test_exec_start
Tool "test_exec_record" can mutate/egress but declares no destructiveHint. Clients that don't default to spec-safe behavior may not prompt before running it.
Fix: Declare accurate annotations, and gate destructive tools on user confirmation regardless.
Location: tool test_exec_record
Tool "test_exec_set_outcome" can mutate/egress but declares no destructiveHint. Clients that don't default to spec-safe behavior may not prompt before running it.
Fix: Declare accurate annotations, and gate destructive tools on user confirmation regardless.
Location: tool test_exec_set_outcome
Tool "test_exec_history" can mutate/egress but declares no destructiveHint. Clients that don't default to spec-safe behavior may not prompt before running it.
Fix: Declare accurate annotations, and gate destructive tools on user confirmation regardless.
Location: tool test_exec_history
Each tool and what it can reach — statically extracted from the published source.
get_revisioningests untrusted inputtest_exec_historyruns code / shelltest_exec_recordruns code / shelltest_exec_set_outcomeruns code / shelltest_exec_startruns code / shellattachment_deleteno sensitive capabilityattachment_getno sensitive capabilityattachment_listno sensitive capabilityattachment_putno sensitive capabilitybulk_change_statusno sensitive capabilitybulk_link_createno sensitive capabilitybulk_ticket_updateno sensitive capabilitycancel_ticketno sensitive capabilitychange_ticket_statusno sensitive capabilitycomplete_ticketno sensitive capabilityderive_test_definitionno sensitive capabilityexport_projectno sensitive capabilitygenerate_product_docno sensitive capabilityget_configno sensitive capabilityget_drift_reportno sensitive capabilityget_trace_coverageno sensitive capabilityimport_ticketsno sensitive capabilityingest_slice_candidatesno sensitive capabilitylink_createno sensitive capabilitylink_deleteno sensitive capabilitylist_links_for_ticketno sensitive capabilitylist_process_stepsno sensitive capabilitylist_projectsno sensitive capabilitylist_releasesno sensitive capabilitylist_revisionsno sensitive capabilitylist_ticketsno sensitive capabilitymark_readyno sensitive capabilitynext_actionableno sensitive capabilityprocess_step_createno sensitive capabilityprocess_step_deleteno sensitive capabilityprocess_step_updateno sensitive capabilityproject_createno sensitive capabilityproject_deleteno sensitive capabilityproject_getno sensitive capabilityproject_updateno sensitive capabilitypublish_test_definitionno sensitive capabilityquery_ticketsno sensitive capabilityrelease_createno sensitive capabilityrelease_deleteno sensitive capabilityrelease_updateno sensitive capabilityreopen_test_definitionno sensitive capabilityreorderno sensitive capabilityrequest_switch_projectno sensitive capabilityrequirement_createno sensitive capabilityrequirement_listno sensitive capabilityresolve_definitions_for_ticketno sensitive capabilityrestore_revisionno sensitive capabilityset_checklist_itemno sensitive capabilityset_configno sensitive capabilityspec_module_createno sensitive capabilitysplit_process_stepno sensitive capabilitytest_def_prereq_addno sensitive capabilitytest_def_prereq_checkno sensitive capabilitytest_def_prereq_removeno sensitive capabilitytest_def_prereq_uncheckno sensitive capabilitytest_def_prereq_updateno sensitive capabilitytest_def_step_addno sensitive capabilitytest_def_step_removeno sensitive capabilitytest_def_step_reorderno sensitive capabilitytest_def_step_updateno sensitive capabilityticket_createno sensitive capabilityticket_deleteno sensitive capabilityticket_getno sensitive capabilityticket_updateno sensitive capabilityupdate_test_definition_metadatano sensitive capabilityCross-tool combinations that form a data-exfiltration primitive (untrusted input → sensitive source → external sink).
Scan history per published version. The engine is deterministic — the same version always yields the same score, so a changed score means the package itself changed.
| Version | Score | Findings | Engine | Scanned |
|---|---|---|---|---|
v1.0.1 latest |
A 93/100 | 10 | 1.13.0 | 2026-09-07 |
Show this server's live Trust Score in your README, docs or website. The badge is served straight from the registry and updates automatically after every rescan — no API key needed. It links back to this page, so anyone who sees the grade can also read the findings behind it instead of taking a number on faith.
The score above is reproducible: the same package version always yields the same result. Run it locally or over the free API — no account, no LLM, fully deterministic.
npx mcptrustchecker scan storymapper --online
MCP AgentChat - 让 AI Agent 通过 Telegram 与用户实时交互:发送消息、图片,等待用户回复
A Model Context Protocol (MCP) server for Airthings Air Quality Monitor devices.
MCP server for Anki
TypeScript package for reading and searching Apple Notes on macOS via direct SQLite access. Includes markdown conversion, attachment support, and offers a local MCP server!
Verified biotech catalyst calendar (PDUFA/AdComm/trial readouts) anchored to official sources.
Appointment booking platform letting agents check provider availability and create bookings.