Scitex Writer MCP Server

scitex-writer PyPI v2.42.0

Published by ywatanabe1989 — no publish provenance, so origin is unverified, but the source is public: the repository link below is self-declared yet readable, so you can inspect the code before adopting it.

LaTeX manuscript compilation system for scientific documents with MCP server

Trust grade
A
93/100
Last scanned get badge →
Trust
A · 93/100
Adoption risk for you: the threat score, then adjusted down for blast radius, publisher verification and how much the scan could see. Deterministic; every point is auditable.
Capability
High
Blast radius if it went rogue — what the server’s tools could reach. Independent of trust.
Coverage
Source
How much the scan could actually inspect. Shallow coverage is stated, never hidden.
Share this Trust Score
𝕏 Share LinkedIn Reddit
A Why this grade threat 100 − adoption risk = 93/100

The grade answers one question — how safe is this server for you to adopt — so it is computed in two auditable stages. Nothing below is an opinion or an LLM's guess; every line is a real term the deterministic engine applied, and the same input always yields the same number.

1. Threat score — 100 − 0 = 100. What the published surface and source actually contain:

The deterministic scan raised no scored threat in the surface it inspected — the threat score stayed at 100. Capability observations and advisory notes are recorded but never lower it.

2. Client adoption risk — 100 − 7 = 93. Three small, subtract-only factors that reflect your risk in adopting it — a clean scan proves less on a powerful, unverified or barely-inspectable package, so the grade says so plainly:

PointsAdoption-risk factor
−6 capability blast radius (high) — client exposure if the model is manipulated
−1 publisher verification (public source) — no provenance, but the source is public and inspectable

Capability observations and info notes are shown under Findings but never scored. Open any row's finding below for the file, line and evidence behind a deduction.

Findings 14

high Dynamic evaluation of a non-literal value (src/scitex_writer/_utils/_verify_tree_structure.py)MTC-SRC-010

In the server's implementation (`src/scitex_writer/_utils/_verify_tree_structure.py:60`): Evaluating a runtime value as code (rather than a fixed literal) executes whatever reaches it — a direct RCE primitive, and almost never necessary in legitimate code. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: ame}_structure" eval(validator_func_name)(project_dir) logger.info( f"{func_name}: Validated tree st

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server src/scitex_writer/_utils/_verify_tree_structure.py

high Dynamic code execution in server code (src/scitex_writer/_sphinx_html/_static/doctools.js)MTC-SRC-001

In the server's implementation (`src/scitex_writer/_sphinx_html/_static/doctools.js:60`): Evaluating strings as code is the most direct RCE primitive; if any tool input reaches it, the server executes attacker-chosen code. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: mentation.PLURAL_EXPR = new Function( "n", `return (${catalog.plural_expr})`, ); Documentation.LOCAL

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server src/scitex_writer/_sphinx_html/_static/doctools.js

high Dynamic code execution in server code (src/scitex_writer/_utils/_verify_tree_structure.py)MTC-SRC-001

In the server's implementation (`src/scitex_writer/_utils/_verify_tree_structure.py:60`): Evaluating strings as code is the most direct RCE primitive; if any tool input reaches it, the server executes attacker-chosen code. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: ame}_structure" eval(validator_func_name)(project_dir) logger.info( f"{func_name}: Validated tree st

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server src/scitex_writer/_utils/_verify_tree_structure.py

high Shell/command execution in server code (src/scitex_writer/_cli/commands/gui.py)MTC-SRC-002

In the server's implementation (`src/scitex_writer/_cli/commands/gui.py:229`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: , "ab") as log: subprocess.Popen(cmd, stdout=log, stderr=log, start_new_session=True) deadline = time.monoto

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server src/scitex_writer/_cli/commands/gui.py

high Shell/command execution in server code (src/scitex_writer/_compile/_execute.py)MTC-SRC-002

In the server's implementation (`src/scitex_writer/_compile/_execute.py:57`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: "] = "1" process = subprocess.Popen( command, shell=False, stdout=subprocess.PIPE,

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server src/scitex_writer/_compile/_execute.py

high Shell/command execution in server code (src/scitex_writer/_compile/content.py)MTC-SRC-002

In the server's implementation (`src/scitex_writer/_compile/content.py:130`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: build_result = subprocess.run( build_cmd, capture_output=True, text=True,

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server src/scitex_writer/_compile/content.py

high Shell/command execution in server code (src/scitex_writer/_core/_engines.py)MTC-SRC-002

In the server's implementation (`src/scitex_writer/_core/_engines.py:72`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: try: out = subprocess.run( [binary, flag], capture_output=True, text=True, timeout=5 ).

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server src/scitex_writer/_core/_engines.py

high Shell/command execution in server code (src/scitex_writer/_dataclasses/core/_DocumentSection.py)MTC-SRC-002

In the server's implementation (`src/scitex_writer/_dataclasses/core/_DocumentSection.py:124`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: ) result = subprocess.run( ["git", "log", "--oneline", str(rel_path)], cwd=

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server src/scitex_writer/_dataclasses/core/_DocumentSection.py

high Shell/command execution in server code (src/scitex_writer/_django/static/writer/assets/pdf.js)MTC-SRC-002

In the server's implementation (`src/scitex_writer/_django/static/writer/assets/pdf.js:2`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: (a.split("+").at(-1)))}}exec(t,e){if(!this.allKeys.has(e.key))return;const s=this.callbacks.get(b(this,Ah,nu).call(this,

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server src/scitex_writer/_django/static/writer/assets/pdf.js

high Shell/command execution in server code (src/scitex_writer/_mcp/handlers/_checks.py)MTC-SRC-002

In the server's implementation (`src/scitex_writer/_mcp/handlers/_checks.py:39`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: try: result = subprocess.run( cmd, cwd=str(project_dir), capture_output=Tr

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server src/scitex_writer/_mcp/handlers/_checks.py

high Shell/command execution in server code (src/scitex_writer/_mcp/handlers/_export.py)MTC-SRC-002

In the server's implementation (`src/scitex_writer/_mcp/handlers/_export.py:33`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: try: result = subprocess.run( cmd, cwd=str(project_path), capture_output=T

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server src/scitex_writer/_mcp/handlers/_export.py

high Shell/command execution in server code (src/scitex_writer/_mcp/handlers/_figures_media.py)MTC-SRC-002

In the server's implementation (`src/scitex_writer/_mcp/handlers/_figures_media.py:213`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: continue subprocess.run( [ binary, "--headless",

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server src/scitex_writer/_mcp/handlers/_figures_media.py

high Shell/command execution in server code (src/scitex_writer/_mcp/handlers/_project.py)MTC-SRC-002

In the server's implementation (`src/scitex_writer/_mcp/handlers/_project.py:39`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: ath)]) result = subprocess.run(cmd, capture_output=True, text=True) if result.returncode != 0:

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server src/scitex_writer/_mcp/handlers/_project.py

medium Dynamic module load from a non-literal (src/scitex_writer/_django/static/writer/assets/pdf.js)MTC-SRC-005

In the server's implementation (`src/scitex_writer/_django/static/writer/assets/pdf.js:2`): Loading a module chosen at runtime (from a variable) can pull in and run attacker-influenced code paths. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: l)?n(this,qr,Wl):(await import(this.workerSrc)).WorkerMessageHandler)())}};Th=new WeakMap,Rn=new WeakMap,kn=new WeakMap,

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server src/scitex_writer/_django/static/writer/assets/pdf.js

Tools 58

Each tool and what it can reach — statically extracted from the published source.

  • writer_bib_list_filesreads sensitive data
  • writer_skills_getingests untrusted input
  • get_usageno sensitive capability
  • writer_apply_citation_styleno sensitive capability
  • writer_bib_addno sensitive capability
  • writer_bib_getno sensitive capability
  • writer_bib_list_entriesno sensitive capability
  • writer_bib_mergeno sensitive capability
  • writer_bib_removeno sensitive capability
  • writer_checks_caption_footnoteno sensitive capability
Show 48 more tools ↓
  • writer_checks_float_orderno sensitive capability
  • writer_checks_limitsno sensitive capability
  • writer_checks_media_provenanceno sensitive capability
  • writer_checks_overflowno sensitive capability
  • writer_checks_paper_symlinkno sensitive capability
  • writer_checks_ref_integrityno sensitive capability
  • writer_checks_referencesno sensitive capability
  • writer_claim_addno sensitive capability
  • writer_claim_formatno sensitive capability
  • writer_claim_getno sensitive capability
  • writer_claim_listno sensitive capability
  • writer_claim_removeno sensitive capability
  • writer_claim_renderno sensitive capability
  • writer_clean_artifactsno sensitive capability
  • writer_compile_archiveno sensitive capability
  • writer_compile_contentno sensitive capability
  • writer_compile_diffno sensitive capability
  • writer_compile_manuscriptno sensitive capability
  • writer_compile_revisionno sensitive capability
  • writer_compile_supplementaryno sensitive capability
  • writer_count_wordsno sensitive capability
  • writer_export_manuscriptno sensitive capability
  • writer_figures_addno sensitive capability
  • writer_figures_archiveno sensitive capability
  • writer_figures_convertno sensitive capability
  • writer_figures_listno sensitive capability
  • writer_figures_pdf_to_imagesno sensitive capability
  • writer_figures_removeno sensitive capability
  • writer_figures_renderno sensitive capability
  • writer_guidelines_buildno sensitive capability
  • writer_guidelines_getno sensitive capability
  • writer_guidelines_list_sectionsno sensitive capability
  • writer_migration_from_overleafno sensitive capability
  • writer_migration_to_overleafno sensitive capability
  • writer_project_cloneno sensitive capability
  • writer_project_get_pdfno sensitive capability
  • writer_project_infono sensitive capability
  • writer_project_list_document_typesno sensitive capability
  • writer_prompts_generate_astano sensitive capability
  • writer_skills_listno sensitive capability
  • writer_tables_addno sensitive capability
  • writer_tables_archiveno sensitive capability
  • writer_tables_csv_to_latexno sensitive capability
  • writer_tables_latex_to_csvno sensitive capability
  • writer_tables_listno sensitive capability
  • writer_tables_removeno sensitive capability
  • writer_tables_renderno sensitive capability
  • writer_update_projectno sensitive capability

What this scan could not see

Versions 2

Scan history per published version. The engine is deterministic — the same version always yields the same score, so a changed score means the package itself changed.

VersionScoreFindingsEngineScanned
v2.42.0 latest A 93/100 14 1.13.0 2026-08-25
v2.41.0 A 93/100 14 1.12.1 2026-07-27

Embed this score

Show this server's live Trust Score in your README, docs or website. The badge is served straight from the registry and updates automatically after every rescan — no API key needed. It links back to this page, so anyone who sees the grade can also read the findings behind it instead of taking a number on faith.

MCP Trust Score: A · 93/100
Markdown (GitHub README)
[![MCP Trust Score](https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/scitex-writer/badge.svg)](https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/scitex-writer)
HTML
<a href="https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/scitex-writer"><img src="https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/scitex-writer/badge.svg" alt="MCP Trust Score" height="20"></a>
Prefer shields.io styling? Point it at https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/scitex-writer/badge.json via https://img.shields.io/endpoint?url=…

Verify this score yourself

The score above is reproducible: the same package version always yields the same result. Run it locally or over the free API — no account, no LLM, fully deterministic.

npx mcptrustchecker scan scitex-writer --online --registry pypi

Use the free API → How scoring works

More in Learning & Documentation