repowire
PyPI
v0.17.0
Published by an unidentified publisher — no publish provenance and no public repository, so the publisher could not be verified and the source cannot be independently located.
The grade answers one question — how safe is this server for you to adopt — so it is computed in two auditable stages. Nothing below is an opinion or an LLM's guess; every line is a real term the deterministic engine applied, and the same input always yields the same number.
1. Threat score — 100 − 0 = 100. What the published surface and source actually contain:
The deterministic scan raised no scored threat in the surface it inspected — the threat score stayed at 100. Capability observations and advisory notes are recorded but never lower it.
2. Client adoption risk — 100 − 8 = 92. Three small, subtract-only factors that reflect your risk in adopting it — a clean scan proves less on a powerful, unverified or barely-inspectable package, so the grade says so plainly:
| Points | Adoption-risk factor |
|---|---|
| −6 | capability blast radius (high) — client exposure if the model is manipulated |
| −2 | publisher verification (unlinked) — no provenance/repo link, but the shipped source was fully read |
Capability observations and info notes are shown under Findings but never scored.
Open any row's finding below for the file, line and evidence behind a deduction.
Tool "spawn_peer" appears to run shell commands or evaluate code (keyword "spawn" in tool name). Arbitrary execution driven by model input is one of the most dangerous MCP capabilities; combined with any untrusted input it becomes RCE.
Fix: Sandbox execution, allowlist commands/arguments, and never pass model output to a shell unescaped.
Location: tool spawn_peer
In the server's implementation (`repowire/agent_backends.py:273`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.
Evidence: try: subprocess.run(["claude", "mcp", "remove", "repowire"], capture_output=True) cmd = [
Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.
Location: server repowire/agent_backends.py
In the server's implementation (`repowire/cli.py:454`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.
Evidence: .[/]") try: subprocess.run(["npm", "install"], cwd=web_dir, check=True) except FileNotFoundError:
Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.
Location: server repowire/cli.py
In the server's implementation (`repowire/client.py:583`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.
Evidence: onfig")) async def spawn( self, path: str, command: str | None = None, *, b
Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.
Location: server repowire/client.py
In the server's implementation (`repowire/daemon/registry_repair.py:37`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.
Evidence: try: result = subprocess.run( ["tmux", "display-message", "-t", peer.pane_id, "-p", "#{pane_pid}"]
Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.
Location: server repowire/daemon/registry_repair.py
In the server's implementation (`repowire/daemon/routes/spawn.py:249`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.
Evidence: daemon restarted since /spawn (in-memory ownership set was lost). Caller can verify with `tmux list-panes`
Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.
Location: server repowire/daemon/routes/spawn.py
In the server's implementation (`repowire/daemon/spawn_diagnostics.py:79`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.
Evidence: try: result = subprocess.run( ["tmux", "capture-pane", "-pt", pane_id, "-S", "-80"], c
Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.
Location: server repowire/daemon/spawn_diagnostics.py
In the server's implementation (`repowire/daemon/spawn_service.py:132`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.
Evidence: return command def spawn( self, *, path: str, backend: AgentType, profile:
Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.
Location: server repowire/daemon/spawn_service.py
In the server's implementation (`repowire/doctor.py:72`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.
Evidence: try: result = subprocess.run( ["tmux", "-V"], capture_output=True, text=True, timeout=5, )
Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.
Location: server repowire/doctor.py
In the server's implementation (`repowire/hooks/_tmux.py:32`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.
Evidence: try: result = subprocess.run( ["tmux", "display-message", "-p", ""], capture_output=Tr
Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.
Location: server repowire/hooks/_tmux.py
In the server's implementation (`repowire/hooks/prompt_handler.py:64`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.
Evidence: ", session_id]) subprocess.Popen( # noqa: S603 — fixed argv, no shell argv, stdin=subpr
Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.
Location: server repowire/hooks/prompt_handler.py
In the server's implementation (`repowire/doctor.py:464`): Loading a module chosen at runtime (from a variable) can pull in and run attacker-influenced code paths. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.
Evidence: f"{import_count} import(s), {event_count} event(s), {mapping_count} peer mapping(s)" ), ) def check
Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.
Location: server repowire/doctor.py
Tool "spawn_peer" can mutate/egress but declares no destructiveHint. Clients that don't default to spec-safe behavior may not prompt before running it.
Fix: Declare accurate annotations, and gate destructive tools on user confirmation regardless.
Location: tool spawn_peer
Each tool and what it can reach — statically extracted from the published source.
spawn_peerruns code / shellackno sensitive capabilityanswerno sensitive capabilityaskno sensitive capabilityask_manyno sensitive capabilityask_many_resultno sensitive capabilitybroadcastno sensitive capabilityclaim_orchestrator_roleno sensitive capabilityjob_cancelno sensitive capabilityjob_createno sensitive capabilityjob_listno sensitive capabilityjob_resultno sensitive capabilityjob_showno sensitive capabilityjob_statusno sensitive capabilityjob_updateno sensitive capabilitykill_peerno sensitive capabilitylist_peersno sensitive capabilitymark_reviewedno sensitive capabilitynotify_peerno sensitive capabilityorchestrator_statusno sensitive capabilityreplyno sensitive capabilityreview_queueno sensitive capabilityrevoke_shareno sensitive capabilityschedule_createno sensitive capabilityschedule_cronno sensitive capabilityschedule_deleteno sensitive capabilityschedule_listno sensitive capabilityschedule_selfno sensitive capabilityset_descriptionno sensitive capabilityshare_sessionno sensitive capabilitywait_on_ackno sensitive capabilitywhoamino sensitive capabilityScan history per published version. The engine is deterministic — the same version always yields the same score, so a changed score means the package itself changed.
| Version | Score | Findings | Engine | Scanned |
|---|---|---|---|---|
v0.17.0 latest |
A 92/100 | 13 | 1.9.0 | 2026-07-23 |
Show this server's live Trust Score in your README, docs or website. The badge is served straight from the registry and updates automatically after every rescan — no API key needed. It links back to this page, so anyone who sees the grade can also read the findings behind it instead of taking a number on faith.
The score above is reproducible: the same package version always yields the same result. Run it locally or over the free API — no account, no LLM, fully deterministic.
npx mcptrustchecker scan repowire --online --registry pypi
Security scan results for the 1stay MCP server.
Security scan results for the Adguard Home MCP server.
Security scan results for the Ado Browser MCP server.
Security scan results for the Adobe Experience Dev MCP server.
Security scan results for the Aemet MCP server.
Security scan results for the Affinity Mcp Bridge MCP server.