Rankup MCP Server

rankup npm v1.3.5

Published by akdenizemirhan — no publish provenance, so origin is unverified, but the source is public: the repository link below is self-declared yet readable, so you can inspect the code before adopting it.

RankUp MCP - All-in-one SEO toolkit for AI agents. 26 tools for keyword research, AI content writing, technical SEO, publishing and more.

Trust grade
A
93/100
Last scanned get badge →
Trust
A · 93/100
Adoption risk for you: the threat score, then adjusted down for blast radius, publisher verification and how much the scan could see. Deterministic; every point is auditable.
Capability
High
Blast radius if it went rogue — what the server’s tools could reach. Independent of trust.
Coverage
Source
How much the scan could actually inspect. Shallow coverage is stated, never hidden.
Share this Trust Score
𝕏 Share LinkedIn Reddit
A Why this grade threat 100 − adoption risk = 93/100

The grade answers one question — how safe is this server for you to adopt — so it is computed in two auditable stages. Nothing below is an opinion or an LLM's guess; every line is a real term the deterministic engine applied, and the same input always yields the same number.

1. Threat score — 100 − 0 = 100. What the published surface and source actually contain:

The deterministic scan raised no scored threat in the surface it inspected — the threat score stayed at 100. Capability observations and advisory notes are recorded but never lower it.

2. Client adoption risk — 100 − 7 = 93. Three small, subtract-only factors that reflect your risk in adopting it — a clean scan proves less on a powerful, unverified or barely-inspectable package, so the grade says so plainly:

PointsAdoption-risk factor
−6 capability blast radius (high) — client exposure if the model is manipulated
−1 publisher verification (public source) — no provenance, but the source is public and inspectable

Capability observations and info notes are shown under Findings but never scored. Open any row's finding below for the file, line and evidence behind a deduction.

Findings 4

high Shell/command execution in server code (dist/cli/update.js)MTC-SRC-002

In the server's implementation (`dist/cli/update.js:1`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: { execSync } from "node:child_process"; import { readdirSync, readFileSync, rmSync } from "node:fs"; import { join } fro

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server dist/cli/update.js

medium Untrusted input can drive an external actionMTC-FLOW-005

Untrusted-input tools ([site_crawl]) co-exist with external-action tools ([send_webhook]). A prompt injection could cause unwanted external actions, though no direct sensitive-data leak path was found.

Evidence: untrusted [site_crawl] → sinks [send_webhook]

Fix: Require confirmation for state-changing/egress actions triggered after processing untrusted content.

Location: flow site_crawl → send_webhook

low Hardcoded egress to an external endpoint in packaging/dev tooling (dist/cli/setup.js)MTC-SRC-003

In a packaging/dev/install script (shipped, but not the server runtime) (`dist/cli/setup.js:51`): A hardcoded outbound call to a fixed external host inside server code is a classic exfiltration/telemetry channel — especially paired with reads of local data. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: const response = await fetch("https://api.rankup.tools/health"); if (!response.ok) throw new Error(

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server dist/cli/setup.js

low Shell/command execution in packaging/dev tooling (dist/cli/setup.js)MTC-SRC-002

In a packaging/dev/install script (shipped, but not the server runtime) (`dist/cli/setup.js:1`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: ort { exec } from "node:child_process"; import { writeConfig, readConfig, configExists, getConfigDir } from "./config.js

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server dist/cli/setup.js

Tools 26

Each tool and what it can reach — statically extracted from the published source.

  • send_webhooknetwork egress
  • site_crawlingests untrusted input
  • clear_sessionno sensitive capability
  • content_briefno sensitive capability
  • content_calendarno sensitive capability
  • content_writeno sensitive capability
  • full_pipelineno sensitive capability
  • generate_imageno sensitive capability
  • geo_optimizeno sensitive capability
  • get_sessionno sensitive capability
Show 16 more tools ↓
  • image_promptno sensitive capability
  • internal_linksno sensitive capability
  • keyword_researchno sensitive capability
  • list_contentno sensitive capability
  • load_contentno sensitive capability
  • on_page_seono sensitive capability
  • page_speedno sensitive capability
  • publish_contentno sensitive capability
  • publish_ghostno sensitive capability
  • publish_wordpressno sensitive capability
  • quality_checkno sensitive capability
  • save_contentno sensitive capability
  • schema_generateno sensitive capability
  • seo_strategyno sensitive capability
  • serp_trackerno sensitive capability
  • topical_mapno sensitive capability

Toxic flows 1

Cross-tool combinations that form a data-exfiltration primitive (untrusted input → sensitive source → external sink).

What this scan could not see

Versions 1

Scan history per published version. The engine is deterministic — the same version always yields the same score, so a changed score means the package itself changed.

VersionScoreFindingsEngineScanned
v1.3.5 latest A 93/100 4 1.13.0 2026-09-07

Embed this score

Show this server's live Trust Score in your README, docs or website. The badge is served straight from the registry and updates automatically after every rescan — no API key needed. It links back to this page, so anyone who sees the grade can also read the findings behind it instead of taking a number on faith.

MCP Trust Score: A · 93/100
Markdown (GitHub README)
[![MCP Trust Score](https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/rankup/badge.svg)](https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/rankup)
HTML
<a href="https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/rankup"><img src="https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/rankup/badge.svg" alt="MCP Trust Score" height="20"></a>
Prefer shields.io styling? Point it at https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/rankup/badge.json via https://img.shields.io/endpoint?url=…

Verify this score yourself

The score above is reproducible: the same package version always yields the same result. Run it locally or over the free API — no account, no LLM, fully deterministic.

npx mcptrustchecker scan rankup --online

Use the free API → How scoring works

More in Web, Search & Scraping