omnibridge-mcp
npm
v1.0.8
Published by an unidentified publisher — no publish provenance and no public repository, so the publisher could not be verified and the source cannot be independently located.
The grade answers one question — how safe is this server for you to adopt — so it is computed in two auditable stages. Nothing below is an opinion or an LLM's guess; every line is a real term the deterministic engine applied, and the same input always yields the same number.
1. Threat score — 100 − 1.2 = 99. What the published surface and source actually contain:
| Points | What was found | Category |
|---|---|---|
| −1.2 | Package runs install-time scripts MTC-SUP-010 | supply-chain |
2. Client adoption risk — 99 − 12 = 87. Three small, subtract-only factors that reflect your risk in adopting it — a clean scan proves less on a powerful, unverified or barely-inspectable package, so the grade says so plainly:
| Points | Adoption-risk factor |
|---|---|
| −10 | capability blast radius (critical) — client exposure if the model is manipulated |
| −2 | publisher verification (unlinked) — no provenance/repo link, but the shipped source was fully read |
Capability observations and info notes are shown under Findings but never scored.
Open any row's finding below for the file, line and evidence behind a deduction.
This server (without client built-ins) exposes a complete data-exfiltration chain: get_issue_details → get_logging_data → create_issue. Untrusted input is ingested, private data is read, and it can be sent to an external sink via the agent composing the tools (→). Static analysis proves the primitive exists, not that a specific run will occur.
Fix: Remove one leg of the trifecta: isolate untrusted-input tools from secret-reading tools and from egress tools, or require human approval between them.
Location: flow get_issue_details → get_logging_data → create_issue
In the server's implementation (`dist/db/init.js:1`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.
Evidence: { execSync } from "node:child_process"; import path from "node:path"; import { fileURLToPath } from "node:url"; import {
Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.
Location: server dist/db/init.js
"omnibridge-mcp" executes postinstall script(s) at install time. An install hook runs at install time; most are routine build/setup, but review what it does before trusting it.
Evidence: prisma generate
Fix: Review the scripts; install with --ignore-scripts where possible and vet what they do.
Location: package omnibridge-mcp
Each tool and what it can reach — statically extracted from the published source.
create_issuenetwork egresscreate_pull_requestnetwork egressget_issue_detailsingests untrusted inputget_logging_datareads sensitive dataget_repo_detailsingests untrusted inputlist_recent_discord_messagesingests untrusted inputadd_collaboratorsno sensitive capabilityadd_issue_commentno sensitive capabilityadd_pr_commentno sensitive capabilitychange_repo_visibilityno sensitive capabilityclose_issueno sensitive capabilityclose_pull_requestno sensitive capabilitycreate_branchno sensitive capabilitycreate_repono sensitive capabilitydelete_branchno sensitive capabilitydelete_repono sensitive capabilityfork_repono sensitive capabilityget_branchno sensitive capabilityget_commit_activityno sensitive capabilityget_contributor_statsno sensitive capabilityget_my_profileno sensitive capabilityget_pull_requestno sensitive capabilityget_repo_clone_countno sensitive capabilityget_repo_viewsno sensitive capabilityget_top_pathsno sensitive capabilityget_top_referrersno sensitive capabilityget_userno sensitive capabilitylist_all_issuesno sensitive capabilitylist_all_reposno sensitive capabilitylist_available_toolsno sensitive capabilitylist_branchesno sensitive capabilitylist_collaboratorsno sensitive capabilitylist_followersno sensitive capabilitylist_followingno sensitive capabilitylist_notificationsno sensitive capabilitylist_pull_requestsno sensitive capabilitymark_notification_readno sensitive capabilitymerge_pull_requestno sensitive capabilityremove_collaboratorsno sensitive capabilitysend_discord_messageno sensitive capabilitystar_repono sensitive capabilityunstar_repono sensitive capabilityupdate_issueno sensitive capabilityupdate_repo_metadatano sensitive capabilityCross-tool combinations that form a data-exfiltration primitive (untrusted input → sensitive source → external sink).
Scan history per published version. The engine is deterministic — the same version always yields the same score, so a changed score means the package itself changed.
| Version | Score | Findings | Engine | Scanned |
|---|---|---|---|---|
v1.0.8 latest |
B 87/100 | 3 | 1.8.0 | 2026-07-23 |
Show this server's live Trust Score in your README, docs or website. The badge is served straight from the registry and updates automatically after every rescan — no API key needed. It links back to this page, so anyone who sees the grade can also read the findings behind it instead of taking a number on faith.
The score above is reproducible: the same package version always yields the same result. Run it locally or over the free API — no account, no LLM, fully deterministic.
npx mcptrustchecker scan omnibridge-mcp --online
Independent packages implementing the same tool, scanned with the same engine. Compare all 2 side by side →
Security scan results for the 1stay MCP server.
Security scan results for the Adguard Home MCP server.
Security scan results for the Ado Browser MCP server.
Security scan results for the Adobe Experience Dev MCP server.
Security scan results for the Aemet MCP server.
Security scan results for the Affinity Mcp Bridge MCP server.