Omnibridge (npm) MCP Server

omnibridge-mcp npm v1.0.8

Published by an unidentified publisher — no publish provenance and no public repository, so the publisher could not be verified and the source cannot be independently located.

Trust grade
B
87/100
Last scanned
Trust
B · 87/100
Adoption risk for you: the threat score, then adjusted down for blast radius, publisher verification and how much the scan could see. Deterministic; every point is auditable.
Capability
Critical
Blast radius if it went rogue — what the server’s tools could reach. Independent of trust.
Coverage
Source
How much the scan could actually inspect. Shallow coverage is stated, never hidden.
B Why this grade threat 99 − adoption risk = 87/100

The grade answers one question — how safe is this server for you to adopt — so it is computed in two auditable stages. Nothing below is an opinion or an LLM's guess; every line is a real term the deterministic engine applied, and the same input always yields the same number.

1. Threat score — 100 − 1.2 = 99. What the published surface and source actually contain:

PointsWhat was foundCategory
−1.2 Package runs install-time scripts MTC-SUP-010 supply-chain

2. Client adoption risk — 99 − 12 = 87. Three small, subtract-only factors that reflect your risk in adopting it — a clean scan proves less on a powerful, unverified or barely-inspectable package, so the grade says so plainly:

PointsAdoption-risk factor
−10 capability blast radius (critical) — client exposure if the model is manipulated
−2 publisher verification (unlinked) — no provenance/repo link, but the shipped source was fully read

Capability observations and info notes are shown under Findings but never scored. Open any row's finding below for the file, line and evidence behind a deduction.

Findings 3

critical Completed toxic-flow trifecta across toolsMTC-FLOW-002

This server (without client built-ins) exposes a complete data-exfiltration chain: get_issue_details → get_logging_data → create_issue. Untrusted input is ingested, private data is read, and it can be sent to an external sink via the agent composing the tools (→). Static analysis proves the primitive exists, not that a specific run will occur.

Fix: Remove one leg of the trifecta: isolate untrusted-input tools from secret-reading tools and from egress tools, or require human approval between them.

Location: flow get_issue_details → get_logging_data → create_issue

high Shell/command execution in server code (dist/db/init.js)MTC-SRC-002

In the server's implementation (`dist/db/init.js:1`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: { execSync } from "node:child_process"; import path from "node:path"; import { fileURLToPath } from "node:url"; import {

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server dist/db/init.js

low Package runs install-time scripts (postinstall)MTC-SUP-010

"omnibridge-mcp" executes postinstall script(s) at install time. An install hook runs at install time; most are routine build/setup, but review what it does before trusting it.

Evidence: prisma generate

Fix: Review the scripts; install with --ignore-scripts where possible and vet what they do.

Location: package omnibridge-mcp

Tools 44

Each tool and what it can reach — statically extracted from the published source.

  • create_issuenetwork egress
  • create_pull_requestnetwork egress
  • get_issue_detailsingests untrusted input
  • get_logging_datareads sensitive data
  • get_repo_detailsingests untrusted input
  • list_recent_discord_messagesingests untrusted input
  • add_collaboratorsno sensitive capability
  • add_issue_commentno sensitive capability
  • add_pr_commentno sensitive capability
  • change_repo_visibilityno sensitive capability
Show 34 more tools ↓
  • close_issueno sensitive capability
  • close_pull_requestno sensitive capability
  • create_branchno sensitive capability
  • create_repono sensitive capability
  • delete_branchno sensitive capability
  • delete_repono sensitive capability
  • fork_repono sensitive capability
  • get_branchno sensitive capability
  • get_commit_activityno sensitive capability
  • get_contributor_statsno sensitive capability
  • get_my_profileno sensitive capability
  • get_pull_requestno sensitive capability
  • get_repo_clone_countno sensitive capability
  • get_repo_viewsno sensitive capability
  • get_top_pathsno sensitive capability
  • get_top_referrersno sensitive capability
  • get_userno sensitive capability
  • list_all_issuesno sensitive capability
  • list_all_reposno sensitive capability
  • list_available_toolsno sensitive capability
  • list_branchesno sensitive capability
  • list_collaboratorsno sensitive capability
  • list_followersno sensitive capability
  • list_followingno sensitive capability
  • list_notificationsno sensitive capability
  • list_pull_requestsno sensitive capability
  • mark_notification_readno sensitive capability
  • merge_pull_requestno sensitive capability
  • remove_collaboratorsno sensitive capability
  • send_discord_messageno sensitive capability
  • star_repono sensitive capability
  • unstar_repono sensitive capability
  • update_issueno sensitive capability
  • update_repo_metadatano sensitive capability

Toxic flows 1

Cross-tool combinations that form a data-exfiltration primitive (untrusted input → sensitive source → external sink).

What this scan could not see

Versions

Scan history per published version. The engine is deterministic — the same version always yields the same score, so a changed score means the package itself changed.

VersionScoreFindingsEngineScanned
v1.0.8 latest B 87/100 3 1.8.0 2026-07-23

Embed this score

Show this server's live Trust Score in your README, docs or website. The badge is served straight from the registry and updates automatically after every rescan — no API key needed. It links back to this page, so anyone who sees the grade can also read the findings behind it instead of taking a number on faith.

MCP Trust Score: B · 87/100
Markdown (GitHub README)
[![MCP Trust Score](https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/omnibridge-mcp/badge.svg)](https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/omnibridge-mcp)
HTML
<a href="https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/omnibridge-mcp"><img src="https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/omnibridge-mcp/badge.svg" alt="MCP Trust Score" height="20"></a>
Prefer shields.io styling? Point it at https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/omnibridge-mcp/badge.json via https://img.shields.io/endpoint?url=…

Verify this score yourself

The score above is reproducible: the same package version always yields the same result. Run it locally or over the free API — no account, no LLM, fully deterministic.

npx mcptrustchecker scan omnibridge-mcp --online

Use the free API → How scoring works

Other implementations of Omnibridge 1

Independent packages implementing the same tool, scanned with the same engine. Compare all 2 side by side →

More in Developer Tools