@nordsym/apiclaw
npm
v2.9.11
Source verified
Published by nordsym — publish provenance cryptographically ties this package to that repository. That is proof of origin, not an official vendor package.
The Control Plane for AI Agents. 26,701 discoverable APIs, 2,906 callable, 49 fully managed. Agent-native auth: `apiclaw auth login` opens your browser, one-tap sign-in, writes ~/.apiclaw.toml. Four doors: local MCP, CLI, HTTP gateway, Remote MCP. One aut
The grade answers one question — how safe is this server for you to adopt — so it is computed in two auditable stages. Nothing below is an opinion or an LLM's guess; every line is a real term the deterministic engine applied, and the same input always yields the same number.
1. Threat score — 100 − 1.2 = 99. What the published surface and source actually contain:
| Points | What was found | Category |
|---|---|---|
| −1.2 | Package runs install-time scripts MTC-SUP-010 | supply-chain |
2. Client adoption risk — 99 − 10 = 89. Three small, subtract-only factors that reflect your risk in adopting it — a clean scan proves less on a powerful, unverified or barely-inspectable package, so the grade says so plainly:
| Points | Adoption-risk factor |
|---|---|
| −10 | capability blast radius (critical) — client exposure if the model is manipulated |
Capability observations and info notes are shown under Findings but never scored.
Open any row's finding below for the file, line and evidence behind a deduction.
This server (without client built-ins) exposes a complete data-exfiltration chain: call_api → list_categories → call_api. Untrusted input is ingested, private data is read, and it can be sent to an external sink via the agent composing the tools (→). Static analysis proves the primitive exists, not that a specific run will occur.
Fix: Remove one leg of the trifecta: isolate untrusted-input tools from secret-reading tools and from egress tools, or require human approval between them.
Location: flow call_api → list_categories → call_api
In the server's implementation (`dist/cli/commands/doctor.js:6`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.
Evidence: port { execSync } from 'child_process'; import { getAllClients, getClientConfig } from '../../utils/paths.js'; import {
Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.
Location: server dist/cli/commands/doctor.js
In the server's implementation (`dist/cli/commands/mcp-install.js:9`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.
Evidence: port { execSync } from 'child_process'; import chalk from 'chalk'; import { AUTH_LOGIN_COMMAND, completeFirstRunAuth, }
Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.
Location: server dist/cli/commands/mcp-install.js
In the server's implementation (`dist/pending-login-start.js:10`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.
Evidence: rt { spawn } from "node:child_process"; import { pendingLoginStillOpen } from "./cli-auth-redeem.js"; import { readPendi
Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.
Location: server dist/pending-login-start.js
In the server's implementation (`dist/index.js:1212`): A hardcoded outbound call to a fixed external host inside server code is a classic exfiltration/telemetry channel — especially paired with reads of local data. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.
Evidence: ) { fetch('https://adventurous-avocet-799.convex.cloud/api/mutation', { meth
Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.
Location: server dist/index.js
In the server's implementation (`dist/open-apis.js:275`): A hardcoded outbound call to a fixed external host inside server code is a classic exfiltration/telemetry channel — especially paired with reads of local data. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.
Evidence: const response = await fetch(`https://kroki.io/${type}/${format}`, { method: 'POST',
Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.
Location: server dist/open-apis.js
In a packaging/dev/install script (shipped, but not the server runtime) (`dist/acp-server.test.js:10`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.
Evidence: rt { spawn } from "node:child_process"; import { mkdtempSync, rmSync } from "node:fs"; import { tmpdir } from "node:os";
Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.
Location: server dist/acp-server.test.js
In a packaging/dev/install script (shipped, but not the server runtime) (`dist/skill.test.js:9`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.
Evidence: spawnSync } from "node:child_process"; import { existsSync, mkdtempSync, readFileSync, rmSync } from "node:fs"; import
Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.
Location: server dist/skill.test.js
"@nordsym/apiclaw" executes postinstall script(s) at install time. An install hook runs at install time; most are routine build/setup, but review what it does before trusting it.
Evidence: node dist/postinstall.js || true
Fix: Review the scripts; install with --ignore-scripts where possible and vet what they do.
Location: package @nordsym/apiclaw
Each tool and what it can reach — statically extracted from the published source.
call_apiingests untrusted inputnetwork egressdiscover_apisingests untrusted inputlist_categoriesreads sensitive dataapiclawno sensitive capabilityapiclaw_helpno sensitive capabilitycapabilityno sensitive capabilitycheck_balanceno sensitive capabilitycheck_workspace_statusno sensitive capabilitydiscover_missionsno sensitive capabilityget_api_detailsno sensitive capabilityget_chain_statusno sensitive capabilitylist_capabilitiesno sensitive capabilitylist_connectedno sensitive capabilitylist_mission_templatesno sensitive capabilitylist_missionsno sensitive capabilitylist_modelsno sensitive capabilitymission_statusno sensitive capabilityresume_chainno sensitive capabilitystart_missionno sensitive capabilityCross-tool combinations that form a data-exfiltration primitive (untrusted input → sensitive source → external sink).
Scan history per published version. The engine is deterministic — the same version always yields the same score, so a changed score means the package itself changed.
| Version | Score | Findings | Engine | Scanned |
|---|---|---|---|---|
v2.9.11 latest |
B 89/100 | 9 | 1.13.0 | 2026-09-07 |
v2.9.9 |
B 89/100 | 9 | 1.13.0 | 2026-09-01 |
v2.9.6 |
B 89/100 | 9 | 1.13.0 | 2026-08-31 |
v2.9.5 |
B 89/100 | 9 | 1.13.0 | 2026-08-30 |
v2.9.3 |
B 89/100 | 9 | 1.13.0 | 2026-08-29 |
v2.9.2 |
B 89/100 | 9 | 1.13.0 | 2026-08-28 |
v2.9.1 |
B 89/100 | 9 | 1.13.0 | 2026-08-27 |
v2.9.0 |
B 89/100 | 8 | 1.13.0 | 2026-08-25 |
v2.8.9 |
B 88/100 | 7 | 1.12.1 | 2026-08-24 |
v2.8.7 |
B 88/100 | 7 | 1.12.1 | 2026-08-23 |
Show this server's live Trust Score in your README, docs or website. The badge is served straight from the registry and updates automatically after every rescan — no API key needed. It links back to this page, so anyone who sees the grade can also read the findings behind it instead of taking a number on faith.
The score above is reproducible: the same package version always yields the same result. Run it locally or over the free API — no account, no LLM, fully deterministic.
npx mcptrustchecker scan @nordsym/apiclaw --online
FDA device & vehicle recall risk for AI agents: recall history, MAUDE trend, risk score.
Open-source MCP server exposing Agent402.Tools' catalog — 500+ strong: 400+ self-hostable tools + 100 multi-tool skill packs (security-audit, trend-analysis, structured-scrape, decode-blob, forecasting-bake-off) for AI agents — browser, web search & answe
Zero-dependency MCP server that gives AI agents a self-updating project memory in AGENTS.md. Returns merge instructions instead of mutating state, so every change is a reviewable diff.
MCP Apps UI resources and server helpers for n8n
MCP server providing comprehensive access to BookStack knowledge management system
MCP server for tracking achievements with STAR methodology