Miot MCP Server

miot-mcp PyPI v2.0.0

Published by javen-yan — no publish provenance, so origin is unverified, but the source is public: the repository link below is self-declared yet readable, so you can inspect the code before adopting it.

Mijia smart device MCP server, providing device discovery, property read/write, action invoke and other functions

Trust grade
A
93/100
Last scanned get badge →
Trust
A · 93/100
Adoption risk for you: the threat score, then adjusted down for blast radius, publisher verification and how much the scan could see. Deterministic; every point is auditable.
Capability
High
Blast radius if it went rogue — what the server’s tools could reach. Independent of trust.
Coverage
Source
How much the scan could actually inspect. Shallow coverage is stated, never hidden.
Share this Trust Score
𝕏 Share LinkedIn Reddit
A Why this grade threat 100 − adoption risk = 93/100

The grade answers one question — how safe is this server for you to adopt — so it is computed in two auditable stages. Nothing below is an opinion or an LLM's guess; every line is a real term the deterministic engine applied, and the same input always yields the same number.

1. Threat score — 100 − 0 = 100. What the published surface and source actually contain:

The deterministic scan raised no scored threat in the surface it inspected — the threat score stayed at 100. Capability observations and advisory notes are recorded but never lower it.

2. Client adoption risk — 100 − 7 = 93. Three small, subtract-only factors that reflect your risk in adopting it — a clean scan proves less on a powerful, unverified or barely-inspectable package, so the grade says so plainly:

PointsAdoption-risk factor
−6 capability blast radius (high) — client exposure if the model is manipulated
−1 publisher verification (public source) — no provenance, but the source is public and inspectable

Capability observations and info notes are shown under Findings but never scored. Open any row's finding below for the file, line and evidence behind a deduction.

Findings 1

high Shell/command execution in server code (adapter/mijia_adapter.py)MTC-SRC-002

In the server's implementation (`adapter/mijia_adapter.py:126`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: n": subprocess.Popen(["open", str(path)]) _LOGGER.info("Opened QR artifact with

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server adapter/mijia_adapter.py

Tools 26

Each tool and what it can reach — statically extracted from the published source.

  • clear_saved_loginno sensitive capability
  • control_by_intentno sensitive capability
  • control_deviceno sensitive capability
  • execute_sceneno sensitive capability
  • get_consumable_itemsno sensitive capability
  • get_deviceno sensitive capability
  • get_device_capabilitiesno sensitive capability
  • get_device_statusno sensitive capability
  • get_home_overviewno sensitive capability
  • get_service_statusno sensitive capability
Show 16 more tools ↓
  • get_tool_catalogno sensitive capability
  • list_devicesno sensitive capability
  • list_homesno sensitive capability
  • list_scenesno sensitive capability
  • pingno sensitive capability
  • prepare_loginno sensitive capability
  • reconnect_serviceno sensitive capability
  • refresh_devicesno sensitive capability
  • set_brightnessno sensitive capability
  • set_color_temperatureno sensitive capability
  • set_cover_positionno sensitive capability
  • set_fan_speedno sensitive capability
  • set_hvac_modeno sensitive capability
  • set_target_temperatureno sensitive capability
  • turn_off_deviceno sensitive capability
  • turn_on_deviceno sensitive capability

What this scan could not see

Versions 1

Scan history per published version. The engine is deterministic — the same version always yields the same score, so a changed score means the package itself changed.

VersionScoreFindingsEngineScanned
v2.0.0 latest A 93/100 1 1.13.0 2026-08-25

Embed this score

Show this server's live Trust Score in your README, docs or website. The badge is served straight from the registry and updates automatically after every rescan — no API key needed. It links back to this page, so anyone who sees the grade can also read the findings behind it instead of taking a number on faith.

MCP Trust Score: A · 93/100
Markdown (GitHub README)
[![MCP Trust Score](https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/miot-mcp/badge.svg)](https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/miot-mcp)
HTML
<a href="https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/miot-mcp"><img src="https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/miot-mcp/badge.svg" alt="MCP Trust Score" height="20"></a>
Prefer shields.io styling? Point it at https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/miot-mcp/badge.json via https://img.shields.io/endpoint?url=…

Verify this score yourself

The score above is reproducible: the same package version always yields the same result. Run it locally or over the free API — no account, no LLM, fully deterministic.

npx mcptrustchecker scan miot-mcp --online --registry pypi

Use the free API → How scoring works

More in API Development