Mcpagentai MCP Server
mcpagentai
PyPI
v1.0.0
Published by an unidentified publisher — no publish provenance and no public repository, so the publisher could not be verified and the source cannot be independently located.
A generic multi-tool MCP Agent with Twitter, Eliza, Weather, Dictionary, Calculator, etc.
The grade answers one question — how safe is this server for you to adopt — so it is computed in two auditable stages. Nothing below is an opinion or an LLM's guess; every line is a real term the deterministic engine applied, and the same input always yields the same number.
1. Threat score — 100 − 0 = 100. What the published surface and source actually contain:
The deterministic scan raised no scored threat in the surface it inspected — the threat score stayed at 100. Capability observations and advisory notes are recorded but never lower it.
2. Client adoption risk — 100 − 8 = 92. Three small, subtract-only factors that reflect your risk in adopting it — a clean scan proves less on a powerful, unverified or barely-inspectable package, so the grade says so plainly:
| Points | Adoption-risk factor |
|---|---|
| −6 | capability blast radius (high) — client exposure if the model is manipulated |
| −2 | publisher verification (unlinked) — no provenance/repo link, but the shipped source was fully read |
Capability observations and info notes are shown under Findings but never scored.
Open any row's finding below for the file, line and evidence behind a deduction.
Findings 3
high Dynamic evaluation of a non-literal value (src/mcpagentai/tools/calculator_agent.py)MTC-SRC-010
In the server's implementation (`src/mcpagentai/tools/calculator_agent.py:46`): Evaluating a runtime value as code (rather than a fixed literal) executes whatever reaches it — a direct RCE primitive, and almost never necessary in legitimate code. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.
Evidence: y: result = eval(expr) # For demonstration only, not recommended for production except Exception as
Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.
Location: server src/mcpagentai/tools/calculator_agent.py
high Dynamic code execution in server code (src/mcpagentai/tools/calculator_agent.py)MTC-SRC-001
In the server's implementation (`src/mcpagentai/tools/calculator_agent.py:11`): Evaluating strings as code is the most direct RCE primitive; if any tool input reaches it, the server executes attacker-chosen code. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.
Evidence: ressions using Python's eval (cautiously). For real usage, consider a safe parser or sandbox for security. """
Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.
Location: server src/mcpagentai/tools/calculator_agent.py
high Shell/command execution in server code (src/mcpagentai/tools/twitter/agent_client_wrapper.py)MTC-SRC-002
In the server's implementation (`src/mcpagentai/tools/twitter/agent_client_wrapper.py:21`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.
Evidence: content) process = subprocess.Popen( ["node", script_filename], stdout=subprocess.PIPE, std
Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.
Location: server src/mcpagentai/tools/twitter/agent_client_wrapper.py
Tools 2
Each tool and what it can reach — statically extracted from the published source.
calculate_expressionno sensitive capabilitydefine_wordno sensitive capability
What this scan could not see
- Tools were statically extracted from the published source (2 recovered), not enumerated from a running server. Tool-poisoning, Unicode-smuggling, capability and toxic-flow analysis ran on this inferred surface, but a mis-parsed registration could be missed or mis-attributed, so tool-derived findings are capped below “confirmed”. To grade the real runtime surface, scan the running server: --command "npx -y <package>".
Versions 1
Scan history per published version. The engine is deterministic — the same version always yields the same score, so a changed score means the package itself changed.
| Version | Score | Findings | Engine | Scanned |
|---|---|---|---|---|
v1.0.0 latest |
A 92/100 | 3 | 1.13.0 | 2026-08-25 |
Embed this score
Show this server's live Trust Score in your README, docs or website. The badge is served straight from the registry and updates automatically after every rescan — no API key needed. It links back to this page, so anyone who sees the grade can also read the findings behind it instead of taking a number on faith.
Verify this score yourself
The score above is reproducible: the same package version always yields the same result. Run it locally or over the free API — no account, no LLM, fully deterministic.
npx mcptrustchecker scan mcpagentai --online --registry pypiMore in API Development
Adapters for the FrontMCP framework
Transcend MCP Server — Admin tools.
Transcend MCP Server — Assessments tools.
MCP Server for Bling
MCP Server for Blogger API
Official MCP server for Brilliant Directories — manage members, posts, leads, reviews, and more.