Wordpress (docdyhr) MCP Server

mcp-wordpress npm v3.3.34 Source verified

Published by docdyhr — publish provenance cryptographically ties this package to that repository. That is proof of origin, not an official vendor package.

Comprehensive Model Context Protocol server for WordPress management with composition-based architecture, 71 tools, SEO toolkit, performance monitoring, intelligent caching, and production-ready authentication

Trust grade
A
94/100
Last scanned get badge →
Trust
A · 94/100
Adoption risk for you: the threat score, then adjusted down for blast radius, publisher verification and how much the scan could see. Deterministic; every point is auditable.
Capability
High
Blast radius if it went rogue — what the server’s tools could reach. Independent of trust.
Coverage
Source
How much the scan could actually inspect. Shallow coverage is stated, never hidden.
Share this Trust Score
𝕏 Share LinkedIn Reddit
A Why this grade threat 100 − adoption risk = 94/100

The grade answers one question — how safe is this server for you to adopt — so it is computed in two auditable stages. Nothing below is an opinion or an LLM's guess; every line is a real term the deterministic engine applied, and the same input always yields the same number.

1. Threat score — 100 − 0 = 100. What the published surface and source actually contain:

The deterministic scan raised no scored threat in the surface it inspected — the threat score stayed at 100. Capability observations and advisory notes are recorded but never lower it.

2. Client adoption risk — 100 − 6 = 94. Three small, subtract-only factors that reflect your risk in adopting it — a clean scan proves less on a powerful, unverified or barely-inspectable package, so the grade says so plainly:

PointsAdoption-risk factor
−6 capability blast radius (high) — client exposure if the model is manipulated

Capability observations and info notes are shown under Findings but never scored. Open any row's finding below for the file, line and evidence behind a deduction.

Findings 7

high Reads a sensitive credential path or dumps the environment (dist/security/AISecurityScanner.js)MTC-SRC-006

In the server's implementation (`dist/security/AISecurityScanner.js:538`): Reading private keys / cloud credentials, or serializing the whole environment, is a sensitive-data source that becomes exfiltration when combined with any egress. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: vate.key", "id_rsa", ]; for (const fileName of sensitiveFiles) { try {

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server dist/security/AISecurityScanner.js

high Dynamic code execution in server code (dist/security/SecurityReviewer.js)MTC-SRC-001

In the server's implementation (`dist/security/SecurityReviewer.js:445`): Evaluating strings as code is the most direct RCE primitive; if any tool input reaches it, the server executes attacker-chosen code. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: ve.push("Uses dangerous eval() function"); if (/innerHTML.*\+/g.test(content)) negative.push("Potent

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server dist/security/SecurityReviewer.js

high Shell/command execution in server code (bin/status.js)MTC-SRC-002

In the server's implementation (`bin/status.js:6`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: port { execSync } from "child_process"; import dotenv from "dotenv"; const __filename = fileURLToPath(import.meta.url);

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server bin/status.js

high Shell/command execution in server code (dist/security/SecurityReviewer.js)MTC-SRC-002

In the server's implementation (`dist/security/SecurityReviewer.js:102`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: vulnerable: `exec("ls " + userInput);`, secure: `execFile("ls", [userInput]);`, }, },

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server dist/security/SecurityReviewer.js

medium Hardcoded egress to an external endpoint (dist/tools/version.js)MTC-SRC-003

In the server's implementation (`dist/tools/version.js:65`): A hardcoded outbound call to a fixed external host inside server code is a classic exfiltration/telemetry channel — especially paired with reads of local data. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: const response = await fetch("https://api.github.com/repos/docdyhr/mcp-wordpress/releases/latest", { header

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server dist/tools/version.js

medium Dynamic module load from a non-literal (bin/status.js)MTC-SRC-005

In the server's implementation (`bin/status.js:297`): Loading a module chosen at runtime (from a variable) can pull in and run attacker-influenced code paths. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: const module = await import(modulePath); const toolNames = Object.keys(module).filter( (name) =

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server bin/status.js

low Shell/command execution in packaging/dev tooling (bin/setup.js)MTC-SRC-002

In a packaging/dev/install script (shipped, but not the server runtime) (`bin/setup.js:7`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: port { execSync } from "child_process"; import { Writable } from "stream"; import open from "open"; const __filename =

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server bin/setup.js

Tools 25

Each tool and what it can reach — statically extracted from the published source.

  • bulk_operationsno sensitive capability
  • cacheno sensitive capability
  • content_analyzerno sensitive capability
  • internal_linkingno sensitive capability
  • meta_generatorno sensitive capability
  • schema_generatorno sensitive capability
  • seono sensitive capability
  • seo_analyze_contentno sensitive capability
  • seo_clientno sensitive capability
  • seo_generate_metadatano sensitive capability
Show 15 more tools ↓
  • site_auditorno sensitive capability
  • wp_seo_analyze_contentno sensitive capability
  • wp_seo_bulk_updateno sensitive capability
  • wp_seo_bulk_update_metadatano sensitive capability
  • wp_seo_generate_metano sensitive capability
  • wp_seo_generate_metadatano sensitive capability
  • wp_seo_generate_schemano sensitive capability
  • wp_seo_get_live_datano sensitive capability
  • wp_seo_internal_linkingno sensitive capability
  • wp_seo_keyword_researchno sensitive capability
  • wp_seo_site_auditno sensitive capability
  • wp_seo_suggest_internal_linksno sensitive capability
  • wp_seo_test_integrationno sensitive capability
  • wp_seo_track_serpno sensitive capability
  • wp_seo_validate_schemano sensitive capability

What this scan could not see

Versions 10

Scan history per published version. The engine is deterministic — the same version always yields the same score, so a changed score means the package itself changed.

VersionScoreFindingsEngineScanned
v3.3.34 latest A 94/100 7 1.13.0 2026-09-06
v3.3.33 A 94/100 7 1.13.0 2026-09-05
v3.3.32 A 94/100 7 1.13.0 2026-08-30
v3.3.30 A 94/100 7 1.12.1 2026-08-13
v3.3.28 A 94/100 6 1.12.1 2026-08-12
Show 5 more versions ↓
v3.3.27 A 94/100 7 1.12.1 2026-08-09
v3.3.26 A 94/100 7 1.12.1 2026-08-03
v3.3.25 A 94/100 7 1.12.1 2026-08-02
v3.3.23 A 94/100 7 1.12.1 2026-07-27
v3.3.20 A 94/100 7 1.10.0 2026-07-25

Embed this score

Show this server's live Trust Score in your README, docs or website. The badge is served straight from the registry and updates automatically after every rescan — no API key needed. It links back to this page, so anyone who sees the grade can also read the findings behind it instead of taking a number on faith.

MCP Trust Score: A · 94/100
Markdown (GitHub README)
[![MCP Trust Score](https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/mcp-wordpress/badge.svg)](https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/mcp-wordpress)
HTML
<a href="https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/mcp-wordpress"><img src="https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/mcp-wordpress/badge.svg" alt="MCP Trust Score" height="20"></a>
Prefer shields.io styling? Point it at https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/mcp-wordpress/badge.json via https://img.shields.io/endpoint?url=…

Verify this score yourself

The score above is reproducible: the same package version always yields the same result. Run it locally or over the free API — no account, no LLM, fully deterministic.

npx mcptrustchecker scan mcp-wordpress --online

Use the free API → How scoring works

Other implementations of Wordpress 15

Independent packages implementing the same tool, scanned with the same engine. Compare all 16 side by side →

More in Content Management