mcp-wordpress
npm
v3.3.34
Source verified
Published by docdyhr — publish provenance cryptographically ties this package to that repository. That is proof of origin, not an official vendor package.
Comprehensive Model Context Protocol server for WordPress management with composition-based architecture, 71 tools, SEO toolkit, performance monitoring, intelligent caching, and production-ready authentication
The grade answers one question — how safe is this server for you to adopt — so it is computed in two auditable stages. Nothing below is an opinion or an LLM's guess; every line is a real term the deterministic engine applied, and the same input always yields the same number.
1. Threat score — 100 − 0 = 100. What the published surface and source actually contain:
The deterministic scan raised no scored threat in the surface it inspected — the threat score stayed at 100. Capability observations and advisory notes are recorded but never lower it.
2. Client adoption risk — 100 − 6 = 94. Three small, subtract-only factors that reflect your risk in adopting it — a clean scan proves less on a powerful, unverified or barely-inspectable package, so the grade says so plainly:
| Points | Adoption-risk factor |
|---|---|
| −6 | capability blast radius (high) — client exposure if the model is manipulated |
Capability observations and info notes are shown under Findings but never scored.
Open any row's finding below for the file, line and evidence behind a deduction.
In the server's implementation (`dist/security/AISecurityScanner.js:538`): Reading private keys / cloud credentials, or serializing the whole environment, is a sensitive-data source that becomes exfiltration when combined with any egress. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.
Evidence: vate.key", "id_rsa", ]; for (const fileName of sensitiveFiles) { try {
Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.
Location: server dist/security/AISecurityScanner.js
In the server's implementation (`dist/security/SecurityReviewer.js:445`): Evaluating strings as code is the most direct RCE primitive; if any tool input reaches it, the server executes attacker-chosen code. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.
Evidence: ve.push("Uses dangerous eval() function"); if (/innerHTML.*\+/g.test(content)) negative.push("Potent
Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.
Location: server dist/security/SecurityReviewer.js
In the server's implementation (`bin/status.js:6`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.
Evidence: port { execSync } from "child_process"; import dotenv from "dotenv"; const __filename = fileURLToPath(import.meta.url);
Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.
Location: server bin/status.js
In the server's implementation (`dist/security/SecurityReviewer.js:102`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.
Evidence: vulnerable: `exec("ls " + userInput);`, secure: `execFile("ls", [userInput]);`, }, },
Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.
Location: server dist/security/SecurityReviewer.js
In the server's implementation (`dist/tools/version.js:65`): A hardcoded outbound call to a fixed external host inside server code is a classic exfiltration/telemetry channel — especially paired with reads of local data. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.
Evidence: const response = await fetch("https://api.github.com/repos/docdyhr/mcp-wordpress/releases/latest", { header
Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.
Location: server dist/tools/version.js
In the server's implementation (`bin/status.js:297`): Loading a module chosen at runtime (from a variable) can pull in and run attacker-influenced code paths. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.
Evidence: const module = await import(modulePath); const toolNames = Object.keys(module).filter( (name) =
Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.
Location: server bin/status.js
In a packaging/dev/install script (shipped, but not the server runtime) (`bin/setup.js:7`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.
Evidence: port { execSync } from "child_process"; import { Writable } from "stream"; import open from "open"; const __filename =
Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.
Location: server bin/setup.js
Each tool and what it can reach — statically extracted from the published source.
bulk_operationsno sensitive capabilitycacheno sensitive capabilitycontent_analyzerno sensitive capabilityinternal_linkingno sensitive capabilitymeta_generatorno sensitive capabilityschema_generatorno sensitive capabilityseono sensitive capabilityseo_analyze_contentno sensitive capabilityseo_clientno sensitive capabilityseo_generate_metadatano sensitive capabilitysite_auditorno sensitive capabilitywp_seo_analyze_contentno sensitive capabilitywp_seo_bulk_updateno sensitive capabilitywp_seo_bulk_update_metadatano sensitive capabilitywp_seo_generate_metano sensitive capabilitywp_seo_generate_metadatano sensitive capabilitywp_seo_generate_schemano sensitive capabilitywp_seo_get_live_datano sensitive capabilitywp_seo_internal_linkingno sensitive capabilitywp_seo_keyword_researchno sensitive capabilitywp_seo_site_auditno sensitive capabilitywp_seo_suggest_internal_linksno sensitive capabilitywp_seo_test_integrationno sensitive capabilitywp_seo_track_serpno sensitive capabilitywp_seo_validate_schemano sensitive capabilityScan history per published version. The engine is deterministic — the same version always yields the same score, so a changed score means the package itself changed.
| Version | Score | Findings | Engine | Scanned |
|---|---|---|---|---|
v3.3.34 latest |
A 94/100 | 7 | 1.13.0 | 2026-09-06 |
v3.3.33 |
A 94/100 | 7 | 1.13.0 | 2026-09-05 |
v3.3.32 |
A 94/100 | 7 | 1.13.0 | 2026-08-30 |
v3.3.30 |
A 94/100 | 7 | 1.12.1 | 2026-08-13 |
v3.3.28 |
A 94/100 | 6 | 1.12.1 | 2026-08-12 |
v3.3.27 |
A 94/100 | 7 | 1.12.1 | 2026-08-09 |
v3.3.26 |
A 94/100 | 7 | 1.12.1 | 2026-08-03 |
v3.3.25 |
A 94/100 | 7 | 1.12.1 | 2026-08-02 |
v3.3.23 |
A 94/100 | 7 | 1.12.1 | 2026-07-27 |
v3.3.20 |
A 94/100 | 7 | 1.10.0 | 2026-07-25 |
Show this server's live Trust Score in your README, docs or website. The badge is served straight from the registry and updates automatically after every rescan — no API key needed. It links back to this page, so anyone who sees the grade can also read the findings behind it instead of taking a number on faith.
The score above is reproducible: the same package version always yields the same result. Run it locally or over the free API — no account, no LLM, fully deterministic.
npx mcptrustchecker scan mcp-wordpress --online
Independent packages implementing the same tool, scanned with the same engine. Compare all 16 side by side →
MCP Server for WordPress REST API — connect AI agents to WordPress (posts, pages, media, users, custom post types, WooCommerce, Yoast / Rank Math, block themes, multisite, batch).
MCP server for WordPress REST API — manage posts, pages, media, comments, categories, tags, and users
MCP server for WordPress REST API — manage pages, posts, shortcodes and Elementor content from Claude Code.
MCP (Model Context Protocol) server for publishing and managing articles on WordPress sites
A plugin to integrate WordPress with Model Context Protocol (MCP), providing AI-accessible interfaces to WordPress data and functionality through standardized tools, resources, and prompts. Enables AI assistants to interact with posts, users, site setting
MCP server for WordPress integration
Apify MCP Server
Model Context Protocol (MCP) Server for the *@inkeep/agents-mcp* API.
Medicare spending, chronic conditions, hospital quality, readmissions, and enrollment
Public read-only MCP for products, frameworks, guides, methodology, and blog metadata.
Community-maintained MCP server for Atlassian Confluence Data Center. Not affiliated with Atlassian.
MCP server for Contentful Content Management API integration