Personal Suite MCP Server

mcp-personal-suite npm v0.5.6

Published by studiomeyer-io — no publish provenance, so origin is unverified, but the source is public: the repository link below is self-declared yet readable, so you can inspect the code before adopting it.

Local-first personal productivity MCP server for Claude, Cursor, and any MCP client. Email, Calendar, Messaging, Search, Image Generation. BYOK, no cloud, no signup.

Trust grade
A
96/100
Last scanned get badge →
Trust
A · 96/100
Adoption risk for you: the threat score, then adjusted down for blast radius, publisher verification and how much the scan could see. Deterministic; every point is auditable.
Capability
Moderate
Blast radius if it went rogue — what the server’s tools could reach. Independent of trust.
Coverage
Source
How much the scan could actually inspect. Shallow coverage is stated, never hidden.
Share this Trust Score
𝕏 Share LinkedIn Reddit
A Why this grade threat 100 − adoption risk = 96/100

The grade answers one question — how safe is this server for you to adopt — so it is computed in two auditable stages. Nothing below is an opinion or an LLM's guess; every line is a real term the deterministic engine applied, and the same input always yields the same number.

1. Threat score — 100 − 0 = 100. What the published surface and source actually contain:

The deterministic scan raised no scored threat in the surface it inspected — the threat score stayed at 100. Capability observations and advisory notes are recorded but never lower it.

2. Client adoption risk — 100 − 4 = 96. Three small, subtract-only factors that reflect your risk in adopting it — a clean scan proves less on a powerful, unverified or barely-inspectable package, so the grade says so plainly:

PointsAdoption-risk factor
−3 capability blast radius (moderate) — client exposure if the model is manipulated
−1 publisher verification (public source) — no provenance, but the source is public and inspectable

Capability observations and info notes are shown under Findings but never scored. Open any row's finding below for the file, line and evidence behind a deduction.

Findings 9

medium Hardcoded egress to an external endpoint (dist/modules/image/providers/flux.js)MTC-SRC-003

In the server's implementation (`dist/modules/image/providers/flux.js:21`): A hardcoded outbound call to a fixed external host inside server code is a classic exfiltration/telemetry channel — especially paired with reads of local data. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: submitResponse = await fetch('https://queue.fal.run/fal-ai/flux-pro/v1.1', { method: 'POST', headers: {

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server dist/modules/image/providers/flux.js

medium Hardcoded egress to an external endpoint (dist/modules/image/providers/gemini.js)MTC-SRC-003

In the server's implementation (`dist/modules/image/providers/gemini.js:30`): A hardcoded outbound call to a fixed external host inside server code is a classic exfiltration/telemetry channel — especially paired with reads of local data. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: const response = await fetch(`https://generativelanguage.googleapis.com/v1beta/models/gemini-2.0-flash-exp:generateCont

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server dist/modules/image/providers/gemini.js

medium Hardcoded egress to an external endpoint (dist/modules/image/providers/openai.js)MTC-SRC-003

In the server's implementation (`dist/modules/image/providers/openai.js:23`): A hardcoded outbound call to a fixed external host inside server code is a classic exfiltration/telemetry channel — especially paired with reads of local data. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: const response = await fetch('https://api.openai.com/v1/images/generations', { method: 'POST', headers:

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server dist/modules/image/providers/openai.js

medium Hardcoded egress to an external endpoint (dist/modules/search/engines.js)MTC-SRC-003

In the server's implementation (`dist/modules/search/engines.js:147`): A hardcoded outbound call to a fixed external host inside server code is a classic exfiltration/telemetry channel — especially paired with reads of local data. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: const response = await fetch(`https://api.search.brave.com/res/v1/${endpoint}/search?${params.toString()}`, { h

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server dist/modules/search/engines.js

medium Hardcoded egress to an external endpoint (dist/modules/search/providers/exa.js)MTC-SRC-003

In the server's implementation (`dist/modules/search/providers/exa.js:34`): A hardcoded outbound call to a fixed external host inside server code is a classic exfiltration/telemetry channel — especially paired with reads of local data. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: const response = await fetch('https://api.exa.ai/search', { method: 'POST', headers: { 'x-a

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server dist/modules/search/providers/exa.js

medium Hardcoded egress to an external endpoint (dist/modules/search/providers/tavily.js)MTC-SRC-003

In the server's implementation (`dist/modules/search/providers/tavily.js:32`): A hardcoded outbound call to a fixed external host inside server code is a classic exfiltration/telemetry channel — especially paired with reads of local data. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: const response = await fetch('https://api.tavily.com/search', { method: 'POST', headers: {

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server dist/modules/search/providers/tavily.js

medium Hardcoded egress to an external endpoint (dist/modules/system/health-checks.js)MTC-SRC-003

In the server's implementation (`dist/modules/system/health-checks.js:63`): A hardcoded outbound call to a fixed external host inside server code is a classic exfiltration/telemetry channel — especially paired with reads of local data. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: const response = await fetch(`https://api.telegram.org/bot${config.telegram.botToken}/getMe`); if (response

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server dist/modules/system/health-checks.js

low Hardcoded egress to an external endpoint in packaging/dev tooling (dist/cli/setup.js)MTC-SRC-003

In a packaging/dev/install script (shipped, but not the server runtime) (`dist/cli/setup.js:122`): A hardcoded outbound call to a fixed external host inside server code is a classic exfiltration/telemetry channel — especially paired with reads of local data. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: const response = await fetch('https://oauth2.googleapis.com/token', { method: 'POST', headers: { 'Conte

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server dist/cli/setup.js

low Shell/command execution in packaging/dev tooling (dist/cli/setup.js)MTC-SRC-002

In a packaging/dev/install script (shipped, but not the server runtime) (`dist/cli/setup.js:25`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: rt { spawn } from 'node:child_process'; import { platform } from 'node:os'; import { randomBytes, createHash } from 'nod

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server dist/cli/setup.js

Tools 49

Each tool and what it can reach — statically extracted from the published source.

  • image_downloadingests untrusted input
  • search_webingests untrusted input
  • calendar_check_availabilityno sensitive capability
  • calendar_create_eventno sensitive capability
  • calendar_daily_summaryno sensitive capability
  • calendar_delete_eventno sensitive capability
  • calendar_get_eventno sensitive capability
  • calendar_list_calendarsno sensitive capability
  • calendar_list_eventsno sensitive capability
  • calendar_search_eventsno sensitive capability
Show 39 more tools ↓
  • calendar_statusno sensitive capability
  • calendar_upcomingno sensitive capability
  • calendar_update_eventno sensitive capability
  • channel_broadcastno sensitive capability
  • channel_connectno sensitive capability
  • channel_disconnectno sensitive capability
  • channel_historyno sensitive capability
  • channel_listno sensitive capability
  • channel_receiveno sensitive capability
  • channel_sendno sensitive capability
  • channel_statusno sensitive capability
  • email_authno sensitive capability
  • email_deleteno sensitive capability
  • email_foldersno sensitive capability
  • email_forwardno sensitive capability
  • email_listno sensitive capability
  • email_mark_readno sensitive capability
  • email_mark_unreadno sensitive capability
  • email_moveno sensitive capability
  • email_readno sensitive capability
  • email_replyno sensitive capability
  • email_searchno sensitive capability
  • email_sendno sensitive capability
  • email_setupno sensitive capability
  • email_statusno sensitive capability
  • email_threadsno sensitive capability
  • image_editno sensitive capability
  • image_generateno sensitive capability
  • search_code_contextno sensitive capability
  • search_deepno sensitive capability
  • search_imagesno sensitive capability
  • search_newsno sensitive capability
  • search_researchno sensitive capability
  • search_semanticno sensitive capability
  • suite_deleteno sensitive capability
  • suite_guideno sensitive capability
  • suite_healthno sensitive capability
  • suite_setupno sensitive capability
  • suite_statusno sensitive capability

What this scan could not see

Versions 1

Scan history per published version. The engine is deterministic — the same version always yields the same score, so a changed score means the package itself changed.

VersionScoreFindingsEngineScanned
v0.5.6 latest A 96/100 9 1.13.0 2026-09-08

Embed this score

Show this server's live Trust Score in your README, docs or website. The badge is served straight from the registry and updates automatically after every rescan — no API key needed. It links back to this page, so anyone who sees the grade can also read the findings behind it instead of taking a number on faith.

MCP Trust Score: A · 96/100
Markdown (GitHub README)
[![MCP Trust Score](https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/mcp-personal-suite/badge.svg)](https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/mcp-personal-suite)
HTML
<a href="https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/mcp-personal-suite"><img src="https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/mcp-personal-suite/badge.svg" alt="MCP Trust Score" height="20"></a>
Prefer shields.io styling? Point it at https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/mcp-personal-suite/badge.json via https://img.shields.io/endpoint?url=…

Verify this score yourself

The score above is reproducible: the same package version always yields the same result. Run it locally or over the free API — no account, no LLM, fully deterministic.

npx mcptrustchecker scan mcp-personal-suite --online

Use the free API → How scoring works

More in Other