Loopspec MCP Server

loopspec-mcp npm v2.4.1

Published by an unidentified publisher — no publish provenance and no public repository, so the publisher could not be verified and the source cannot be independently located.

The Compound Intelligence Engine for AI Development — MCP server + CLI with sessions, goals, real-time watcher, and smart guardrails

Trust grade
B
83/100
Last scanned get badge →
Trust
B · 83/100
Adoption risk for you: the threat score, then adjusted down for blast radius, publisher verification and how much the scan could see. Deterministic; every point is auditable.
Capability
High
Blast radius if it went rogue — what the server’s tools could reach. Independent of trust.
Coverage
Source
How much the scan could actually inspect. Shallow coverage is stated, never hidden.
Share this Trust Score
𝕏 Share LinkedIn Reddit
B Why this grade threat 91 − adoption risk = 83/100

The grade answers one question — how safe is this server for you to adopt — so it is computed in two auditable stages. Nothing below is an opinion or an LLM's guess; every line is a real term the deterministic engine applied, and the same input always yields the same number.

1. Threat score — 100 − 9.5 = 91. What the published surface and source actually contain:

PointsWhat was foundCategory
−9.5 Untrusted input concatenated into a command sink ×2 MTC-SRC-009 injection

2. Client adoption risk — 91 − 8 = 83. Three small, subtract-only factors that reflect your risk in adopting it — a clean scan proves less on a powerful, unverified or barely-inspectable package, so the grade says so plainly:

PointsAdoption-risk factor
−6 capability blast radius (high) — client exposure if the model is manipulated
−2 publisher verification (unlinked) — no provenance/repo link, but the shipped source was fully read

Capability observations and info notes are shown under Findings but never scored. Open any row's finding below for the file, line and evidence behind a deduction.

Findings 8

high Shell/command execution in server code (dist/chunk-SEVTR4UW.js)MTC-SRC-002

In the server's implementation (`dist/chunk-SEVTR4UW.js:2`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: port { execSync } from "child_process"; import { existsSync, readFileSync } from "fs"; import { homedir } from "os"; imp

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server dist/chunk-SEVTR4UW.js

high Shell/command execution in server code (dist/review-K5X23WCS.js)MTC-SRC-002

In the server's implementation (`dist/review-K5X23WCS.js:21`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: port { execSync } from "child_process"; import path from "path"; import fs from "fs"; function isGitRepo(dir) { try {

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server dist/review-K5X23WCS.js

high Shell/command execution in server code (dist/server.js)MTC-SRC-002

In the server's implementation (`dist/server.js:2523`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: ; import { exec } from "child_process"; import { promisify } from "util"; import fs from "fs"; import path7 from "path";

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server dist/server.js

high Shell/command execution in server code (dist/session-4QHX5AT2.js)MTC-SRC-002

In the server's implementation (`dist/session-4QHX5AT2.js:21`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: port { execSync } from "child_process"; import fs from "fs"; import path from "path"; function getGitChangedFiles(projec

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server dist/session-4QHX5AT2.js

high Shell/command execution in server code (dist/test-TNGMUUKV.js)MTC-SRC-002

In the server's implementation (`dist/test-TNGMUUKV.js:14`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: port { execSync } from "child_process"; import path from "path"; import fs from "fs"; function detectRunner(projectDir)

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server dist/test-TNGMUUKV.js

high Shell/command execution in server code (dist/worktree-AIILDH47.js)MTC-SRC-002

In the server's implementation (`dist/worktree-AIILDH47.js:7`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: port { execSync } from "child_process"; async function runWorktreeCommand(positional, _flags) { const action = positio

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server dist/worktree-AIILDH47.js

medium Untrusted input concatenated into a command sink (dist/review-K5X23WCS.js)MTC-SRC-009

In the server's implementation (`dist/review-K5X23WCS.js:58`): A shell/process command assembled from concatenated or interpolated values is command injection when any part is attacker-influenced — the OWASP canonical RCE flow. Verify what reaches the interpolated value. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: ry { const diff = execSync(`git diff --name-only ${base}`, { cwd: ctx.projectDir, encoding: "utf-8" }); chan

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server dist/review-K5X23WCS.js

medium Untrusted input concatenated into a command sink (dist/worktree-AIILDH47.js)MTC-SRC-009

In the server's implementation (`dist/worktree-AIILDH47.js:28`): A shell/process command assembled from concatenated or interpolated values is command injection when any part is attacker-influenced — the OWASP canonical RCE flow. Verify what reaches the interpolated value. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: } try { execSync(`git worktree add ../${name} -b ${name}`, { encoding: "utf-8", stdio: "pipe" });

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server dist/worktree-AIILDH47.js

Tools 49

Each tool and what it can reach — statically extracted from the published source.

  • loopspec_amplifyno sensitive capability
  • loopspec_autocompleteno sensitive capability
  • loopspec_checker_promptno sensitive capability
  • loopspec_checkpointno sensitive capability
  • loopspec_compoundno sensitive capability
  • loopspec_contextno sensitive capability
  • loopspec_contractsno sensitive capability
  • loopspec_daemonno sensitive capability
  • loopspec_decisionno sensitive capability
  • loopspec_decomposeno sensitive capability
Show 39 more tools ↓
  • loopspec_deployno sensitive capability
  • loopspec_designno sensitive capability
  • loopspec_detectno sensitive capability
  • loopspec_driftno sensitive capability
  • loopspec_enforceno sensitive capability
  • loopspec_escalateno sensitive capability
  • loopspec_feedbackno sensitive capability
  • loopspec_fixno sensitive capability
  • loopspec_goalno sensitive capability
  • loopspec_graphno sensitive capability
  • loopspec_guardrails_addno sensitive capability
  • loopspec_guidanceno sensitive capability
  • loopspec_healno sensitive capability
  • loopspec_inferno sensitive capability
  • loopspec_initno sensitive capability
  • loopspec_maker_promptno sensitive capability
  • loopspec_memory_statsno sensitive capability
  • loopspec_merge_reviewno sensitive capability
  • loopspec_orchestrateno sensitive capability
  • loopspec_planno sensitive capability
  • loopspec_playbookno sensitive capability
  • loopspec_pluginno sensitive capability
  • loopspec_predictno sensitive capability
  • loopspec_preflightno sensitive capability
  • loopspec_profileno sensitive capability
  • loopspec_retryno sensitive capability
  • loopspec_sandboxno sensitive capability
  • loopspec_scoreno sensitive capability
  • loopspec_sessionno sensitive capability
  • loopspec_statusno sensitive capability
  • loopspec_suggestno sensitive capability
  • loopspec_swarmno sensitive capability
  • loopspec_templateno sensitive capability
  • loopspec_typecheckno sensitive capability
  • loopspec_updateno sensitive capability
  • loopspec_verifyno sensitive capability
  • loopspec_vibeno sensitive capability
  • loopspec_watchno sensitive capability
  • loopspec_worktreeno sensitive capability

What this scan could not see

Versions 1

Scan history per published version. The engine is deterministic — the same version always yields the same score, so a changed score means the package itself changed.

VersionScoreFindingsEngineScanned
v2.4.1 latest B 83/100 8 1.13.0 2026-09-07

Embed this score

Show this server's live Trust Score in your README, docs or website. The badge is served straight from the registry and updates automatically after every rescan — no API key needed. It links back to this page, so anyone who sees the grade can also read the findings behind it instead of taking a number on faith.

MCP Trust Score: B · 83/100
Markdown (GitHub README)
[![MCP Trust Score](https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/loopspec-mcp/badge.svg)](https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/loopspec-mcp)
HTML
<a href="https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/loopspec-mcp"><img src="https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/loopspec-mcp/badge.svg" alt="MCP Trust Score" height="20"></a>
Prefer shields.io styling? Point it at https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/loopspec-mcp/badge.json via https://img.shields.io/endpoint?url=…

Verify this score yourself

The score above is reproducible: the same package version always yields the same result. Run it locally or over the free API — no account, no LLM, fully deterministic.

npx mcptrustchecker scan loopspec-mcp --online

Use the free API → How scoring works

More in Developer Tools