Itechsmart MCP Server

@itechsmart/mcp-server npm v2.0.3

Published by @itechsmart — no publish provenance, so origin is unverified, but the source is public: the repository link below is self-declared yet readable, so you can inspect the code before adopting it.

iTechSmart UAIO MCP Server - connect any AI agent to ProofLink verification and autonomous IT operations

Trust grade
A
93/100
Last scanned get badge →
Trust
A · 93/100
Adoption risk for you: the threat score, then adjusted down for blast radius, publisher verification and how much the scan could see. Deterministic; every point is auditable.
Capability
High
Blast radius if it went rogue — what the server’s tools could reach. Independent of trust.
Coverage
Source
How much the scan could actually inspect. Shallow coverage is stated, never hidden.
Share this Trust Score
𝕏 Share LinkedIn Reddit
A Why this grade threat 100 − adoption risk = 93/100

The grade answers one question — how safe is this server for you to adopt — so it is computed in two auditable stages. Nothing below is an opinion or an LLM's guess; every line is a real term the deterministic engine applied, and the same input always yields the same number.

1. Threat score — 100 − 0 = 100. What the published surface and source actually contain:

The deterministic scan raised no scored threat in the surface it inspected — the threat score stayed at 100. Capability observations and advisory notes are recorded but never lower it.

2. Client adoption risk — 100 − 7 = 93. Three small, subtract-only factors that reflect your risk in adopting it — a clean scan proves less on a powerful, unverified or barely-inspectable package, so the grade says so plainly:

PointsAdoption-risk factor
−6 capability blast radius (high) — client exposure if the model is manipulated
−1 publisher verification (public source) — no provenance, but the source is public and inspectable

Capability observations and info notes are shown under Findings but never scored. Open any row's finding below for the file, line and evidence behind a deduction.

Findings 7

high Tool "trmm_run_script" exposes command/code executionMTC-CAP-001

Tool "trmm_run_script" appears to run shell commands or evaluate code (keyword "run_script" in tool name, parameter "script"). Arbitrary execution driven by model input is one of the most dangerous MCP capabilities; combined with any untrusted input it becomes RCE.

Fix: Sandbox execution, allowlist commands/arguments, and never pass model output to a shell unescaped.

Location: tool trmm_run_script

high Shell/command execution in server code (dist/index.js)MTC-SRC-002

In the server's implementation (`dist/index.js:68`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: require("http")); const child_process_1 = require("child_process"); const API_KEYS = new Map(); function loadApiKeys(raw

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server dist/index.js

medium Untrusted input can drive an external actionMTC-FLOW-005

Untrusted-input tools ([get_receipt_chain, get_incident_details]) co-exist with external-action tools ([trmm_run_script, ghl_send_email, itsm_register_webhook]). A prompt injection could cause unwanted external actions, though no direct sensitive-data leak path was found.

Evidence: untrusted [get_receipt_chain, get_incident_details] → sinks [trmm_run_script, ghl_send_email, itsm_register_webhook]

Fix: Require confirmation for state-changing/egress actions triggered after processing untrusted content.

Location: flow get_receipt_chain → trmm_run_script

medium Hardcoded egress to an external endpoint (dist/index.js)MTC-SRC-003

In the server's implementation (`dist/index.js:1947`): A hardcoded outbound call to a fixed external host inside server code is a classic exfiltration/telemetry channel — especially paired with reads of local data. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: const res = await fetch('http://172.18.0.1:8210/api/v1/cluster'); const data = await res.json();

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server dist/index.js

medium Unconstrained URL/host parameter "url" on "itsm_register_webhook"MTC-CAP-007

Tool "itsm_register_webhook" takes a URL/host parameter "url" with no allowlist/pattern. An outbound-request tool with an unbounded destination enables SSRF and cloud-metadata access (e.g. 169.254.169.254).

Fix: Allowlist destinations or constrain the parameter; block private/link-local addresses server-side.

Location: tool itsm_register_webhook · inputSchema.properties.url

medium Unconstrained command parameter "script_id" on "trmm_run_script"MTC-CAP-006

Tool "trmm_run_script" takes a command-shaped parameter "script_id" with no enum/pattern constraint. Free-form, model- or attacker-controlled arguments reaching a shell is the command-injection precondition.

Fix: Constrain the parameter (enum/pattern), or build the command from a fixed template with escaped args.

Location: tool trmm_run_script · inputSchema.properties.script_id

low Mutating tool "trmm_run_script" declares no destructiveHintMTC-CAP-005

Tool "trmm_run_script" can mutate/egress but declares no destructiveHint. Clients that don't default to spec-safe behavior may not prompt before running it.

Fix: Declare accurate annotations, and gate destructive tools on user confirmation regardless.

Location: tool trmm_run_script

Tools 68

Each tool and what it can reach — statically extracted from the published source.

  • get_incident_detailsingests untrusted input
  • get_receipt_chainingests untrusted input
  • ghl_send_emailnetwork egress
  • itsm_register_webhooknetwork egress
  • trmm_run_scriptruns code / shell
  • approve_learning_itemno sensitive capability
  • approve_sie_findingno sensitive capability
  • compliance.audit_summaryno sensitive capability
  • deepgram_blog_audiono sensitive capability
  • deepgram_transcribeno sensitive capability
Show 58 more tools ↓
  • deepgram_ttsno sensitive capability
  • dispatch_ag2_incidentno sensitive capability
  • get_compliance_statusno sensitive capability
  • get_iself_journalno sensitive capability
  • get_learning_metricsno sensitive capability
  • get_learning_queueno sensitive capability
  • get_platform_briefingno sensitive capability
  • get_sie_queueno sensitive capability
  • ghl_book_appointmentno sensitive capability
  • ghl_create_contactno sensitive capability
  • ghl_move_pipelineno sensitive capability
  • ghl_trigger_workflowno sensitive capability
  • ghl_update_contactno sensitive capability
  • integration_statusno sensitive capability
  • invoke_octoai_pipelineno sensitive capability
  • iTechSmart UAIO Agentno sensitive capability
  • itsm_close_ticketno sensitive capability
  • itsm_create_ticketno sensitive capability
  • itsm_dashboard_summaryno sensitive capability
  • itsm_embed_receiptno sensitive capability
  • itsm_get_detection_sourcesno sensitive capability
  • itsm_get_incident_timelineno sensitive capability
  • itsm_get_mttr_statsno sensitive capability
  • itsm_get_remediation_historyno sensitive capability
  • itsm_get_ticketno sensitive capability
  • itsm_list_open_incidentsno sensitive capability
  • itsm_list_ticketsno sensitive capability
  • itsm_run_loopno sensitive capability
  • itsm_run_testno sensitive capability
  • itsm_trigger_detectionno sensitive capability
  • itsm_verify_receiptno sensitive capability
  • langfuse_healthno sensitive capability
  • langfuse_traceno sensitive capability
  • list_recent_incidentsno sensitive capability
  • mesh_devicesno sensitive capability
  • mesh_healthno sensitive capability
  • mission.cluster_healthno sensitive capability
  • mission.list_incidentsno sensitive capability
  • probo_controlsno sensitive capability
  • probo_healthno sensitive capability
  • probo_risksno sensitive capability
  • probo_summaryno sensitive capability
  • prooflink.search_receiptsno sensitive capability
  • prooflink.verify_chainno sensitive capability
  • prooflink.verify_receiptno sensitive capability
  • query_uaio_statusno sensitive capability
  • ragflow_healthno sensitive capability
  • ragflow_queryno sensitive capability
  • search_platform_logsno sensitive capability
  • shuffle_healthno sensitive capability
  • shuffle_triggerno sensitive capability
  • simulate_infrastructure_attackno sensitive capability
  • trigger_sie_scanno sensitive capability
  • trmm_agentsno sensitive capability
  • trmm_healthno sensitive capability
  • trmm_summaryno sensitive capability
  • verify_prooflink_receiptno sensitive capability
  • x-itechsmart-mcp-keyno sensitive capability

Toxic flows 1

Cross-tool combinations that form a data-exfiltration primitive (untrusted input → sensitive source → external sink).

What this scan could not see

Versions 1

Scan history per published version. The engine is deterministic — the same version always yields the same score, so a changed score means the package itself changed.

VersionScoreFindingsEngineScanned
v2.0.3 latest A 93/100 7 1.13.0 2026-09-07

Embed this score

Show this server's live Trust Score in your README, docs or website. The badge is served straight from the registry and updates automatically after every rescan — no API key needed. It links back to this page, so anyone who sees the grade can also read the findings behind it instead of taking a number on faith.

MCP Trust Score: A · 93/100
Markdown (GitHub README)
[![MCP Trust Score](https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/itechsmart-mcp-server/badge.svg)](https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/itechsmart-mcp-server)
HTML
<a href="https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/itechsmart-mcp-server"><img src="https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/itechsmart-mcp-server/badge.svg" alt="MCP Trust Score" height="20"></a>
Prefer shields.io styling? Point it at https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/itechsmart-mcp-server/badge.json via https://img.shields.io/endpoint?url=…

Verify this score yourself

The score above is reproducible: the same package version always yields the same result. Run it locally or over the free API — no account, no LLM, fully deterministic.

npx mcptrustchecker scan @itechsmart/mcp-server --online

Use the free API → How scoring works

More in AI & Agents