Codeplane Server Inventory MCP Server

@isogonic/codeplane-server-inventory npm v0.5.6

Published by @isogonic — no publish provenance, so origin is unverified, but the source is public: the repository link below is self-declared yet readable, so you can inspect the code before adopting it.

Trust grade
C
73/100
Last scanned get badge →
Trust
C · 73/100
Adoption risk for you: the threat score, then adjusted down for blast radius, publisher verification and how much the scan could see. Deterministic; every point is auditable.
Capability
Critical
Blast radius if it went rogue — what the server’s tools could reach. Independent of trust.
Coverage
Source
How much the scan could actually inspect. Shallow coverage is stated, never hidden.
Share this Trust Score
𝕏 Share LinkedIn Reddit
C Why this grade threat 84 − adoption risk = 73/100

The grade answers one question — how safe is this server for you to adopt — so it is computed in two auditable stages. Nothing below is an opinion or an LLM's guess; every line is a real term the deterministic engine applied, and the same input always yields the same number.

1. Threat score — 100 − 16.3 = 84. What the published surface and source actually contain:

PointsWhat was foundCategory
−16.3 Reference to a credential-exfiltration path in metadata ×3 MTC-INJ-TARGET-1 injection

2. Client adoption risk — 84 − 11 = 73. Three small, subtract-only factors that reflect your risk in adopting it — a clean scan proves less on a powerful, unverified or barely-inspectable package, so the grade says so plainly:

PointsAdoption-risk factor
−10 capability blast radius (critical) — client exposure if the model is manipulated
−1 publisher verification (public source) — no provenance, but the source is public and inspectable

Capability observations and info notes are shown under Findings but never scored. Open any row's finding below for the file, line and evidence behind a deduction.

Findings 9

critical Completed toxic-flow trifecta across toolsMTC-FLOW-002

This server (without client built-ins) exposes a complete data-exfiltration chain: list_secrets → get_secret → exec_on. Untrusted input is ingested, private data is read, and it can be sent to an external sink via the agent composing the tools (→). Static analysis proves the primitive exists, not that a specific run will occur.

Fix: Remove one leg of the trifecta: isolate untrusted-input tools from secret-reading tools and from egress tools, or require human approval between them.

Location: flow list_secrets → get_secret → exec_on

high Reference to a credential-exfiltration path in metadataMTC-INJ-TARGET-1

Reference to a credential-exfiltration path in metadata detected in the description of tool "validate_inventory". Instruction-like content in tool metadata is executed by the model, not the human, and is the primary tool-poisoning vector.

Evidence: ~/.ssh

Fix: Tool descriptions should describe behavior, not instruct the assistant. Treat imperative / secrecy / sequencing language in metadata as hostile.

Location: tool validate_inventory · description

high Tool "exec_on" exposes command/code executionMTC-CAP-001

Tool "exec_on" appears to run shell commands or evaluate code (keyword "exec" in tool name, parameter "command"). Arbitrary execution driven by model input is one of the most dangerous MCP capabilities; combined with any untrusted input it becomes RCE.

Fix: Sandbox execution, allowlist commands/arguments, and never pass model output to a shell unescaped.

Location: tool exec_on

high Shell/command execution in server code (dist/secrets.js)MTC-SRC-002

In the server's implementation (`dist/secrets.js:28`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: { execFile } from "node:child_process"; import { promisify } from "node:util"; import { homedir, platform } from "node:o

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server dist/secrets.js

high Shell/command execution in server code (dist/ssh.js)MTC-SRC-002

In the server's implementation (`dist/ssh.js:21`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: { execFile } from "node:child_process"; import path from "node:path"; import { expandHome } from "./paths.js"; /** Map a

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server dist/ssh.js

medium Unconstrained command parameter "command" on "exec_on"MTC-CAP-006

Tool "exec_on" takes a command-shaped parameter "command" with no enum/pattern constraint. Free-form, model- or attacker-controlled arguments reaching a shell is the command-injection precondition.

Fix: Constrain the parameter (enum/pattern), or build the command from a fixed template with escaped args.

Location: tool exec_on · inputSchema.properties.command

low Mutating tool "exec_on" declares no destructiveHintMTC-CAP-005

Tool "exec_on" can mutate/egress but declares no destructiveHint. Clients that don't default to spec-safe behavior may not prompt before running it.

Fix: Declare accurate annotations, and gate destructive tools on user confirmation regardless.

Location: tool exec_on

low Reference to a credential-exfiltration path in metadataMTC-INJ-TARGET-1

Reference to a credential-exfiltration path in metadata detected in the description of tool "add_server". Instruction-like content in tool metadata is executed by the model, not the human, and is the primary tool-poisoning vector.

Evidence: ~/.ssh

Fix: Tool descriptions should describe behavior, not instruct the assistant. Treat imperative / secrecy / sequencing language in metadata as hostile.

Location: tool add_server · description

low Reference to a credential-exfiltration path in metadataMTC-INJ-TARGET-1

Reference to a credential-exfiltration path in metadata detected in the description of tool "paths_report". Instruction-like content in tool metadata is executed by the model, not the human, and is the primary tool-poisoning vector.

Evidence: ~/.ssh

Fix: Tool descriptions should describe behavior, not instruct the assistant. Treat imperative / secrecy / sequencing language in metadata as hostile.

Location: tool paths_report · description

Tools 20

Each tool and what it can reach — statically extracted from the published source.

  • list_secretsingests untrusted inputreads sensitive data
  • exec_onruns code / shell
  • get_secretreads sensitive data
  • add_serverno sensitive capability
  • audit_tailno sensitive capability
  • delete_secretno sensitive capability
  • get_serverno sensitive capability
  • inventory_infono sensitive capability
  • list_all_secretsno sensitive capability
  • list_groupsno sensitive capability
Show 10 more tools ↓
  • list_serversno sensitive capability
  • list_tagsno sensitive capability
  • paths_reportno sensitive capability
  • remove_serverno sensitive capability
  • secrets_infono sensitive capability
  • set_secretno sensitive capability
  • ssh_checkno sensitive capability
  • ssh_target_forno sensitive capability
  • update_serverno sensitive capability
  • validate_inventoryno sensitive capability

Toxic flows 1

Cross-tool combinations that form a data-exfiltration primitive (untrusted input → sensitive source → external sink).

What this scan could not see

Versions 1

Scan history per published version. The engine is deterministic — the same version always yields the same score, so a changed score means the package itself changed.

VersionScoreFindingsEngineScanned
v0.5.6 latest C 73/100 9 1.9.0 2026-07-24

Embed this score

Show this server's live Trust Score in your README, docs or website. The badge is served straight from the registry and updates automatically after every rescan — no API key needed. It links back to this page, so anyone who sees the grade can also read the findings behind it instead of taking a number on faith.

MCP Trust Score: C · 73/100
Markdown (GitHub README)
[![MCP Trust Score](https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/isogonic-codeplane-server-inventory/badge.svg)](https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/isogonic-codeplane-server-inventory)
HTML
<a href="https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/isogonic-codeplane-server-inventory"><img src="https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/isogonic-codeplane-server-inventory/badge.svg" alt="MCP Trust Score" height="20"></a>
Prefer shields.io styling? Point it at https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/isogonic-codeplane-server-inventory/badge.json via https://img.shields.io/endpoint?url=…

Verify this score yourself

The score above is reproducible: the same package version always yields the same result. Run it locally or over the free API — no account, no LLM, fully deterministic.

npx mcptrustchecker scan @isogonic/codeplane-server-inventory --online

Use the free API → How scoring works

More in Developer Tools