Heroku Platform MCP Server

@heroku/mcp-server npm v1.2.7 Source verified

Published by heroku — publish provenance cryptographically ties this package to that repository. That is proof of origin, not an official vendor package.

Official Heroku Platform MCP server for interacting with Heroku apps and platform resources.

Trust grade
B
88/100
Last scanned get badge →
Trust
B · 88/100
Adoption risk for you: the threat score, then adjusted down for blast radius, publisher verification and how much the scan could see. Deterministic; every point is auditable.
Capability
High
Blast radius if it went rogue — what the server’s tools could reach. Independent of trust.
Coverage
Source
How much the scan could actually inspect. Shallow coverage is stated, never hidden.
Share this Trust Score
𝕏 Share LinkedIn Reddit
B Why this grade threat 94 − adoption risk = 88/100

The grade answers one question — how safe is this server for you to adopt — so it is computed in two auditable stages. Nothing below is an opinion or an LLM's guess; every line is a real term the deterministic engine applied, and the same input always yields the same number.

1. Threat score — 100 − 6.3 = 94. What the published surface and source actually contain:

PointsWhat was foundCategory
−6.3 Untrusted input concatenated into a command sink MTC-SRC-009 injection

2. Client adoption risk — 94 − 6 = 88. Three small, subtract-only factors that reflect your risk in adopting it — a clean scan proves less on a powerful, unverified or barely-inspectable package, so the grade says so plainly:

PointsAdoption-risk factor
−6 capability blast radius (high) — client exposure if the model is manipulated

Capability observations and info notes are shown under Findings but never scored. Open any row's finding below for the file, line and evidence behind a deduction.

Findings 6

high Shell/command execution in server code (dist/repl/heroku-cli-repl.js)MTC-SRC-002

In the server's implementation (`dist/repl/heroku-cli-repl.js:1`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: spawnSync } from 'node:child_process'; import { EventEmitter } from 'node:events'; import * as pjson from '../../packag

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server dist/repl/heroku-cli-repl.js

high Shell/command execution in server code (dist/tools/deploy-to-heroku.js)MTC-SRC-002

In the server's implementation (`dist/tools/deploy-to-heroku.js:1`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: { execSync } from 'node:child_process'; import { ValidatorResult } from 'jsonschema'; import { z } from 'zod'; import {

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server dist/tools/deploy-to-heroku.js

high Shell/command execution in server code (dist/utils/plugin-detector.js)MTC-SRC-002

In the server's implementation (`dist/utils/plugin-detector.js:1`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: spawnSync } from 'node:child_process'; /** * Detects if a Heroku CLI plugin is installed * * @param pluginName - The

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server dist/utils/plugin-detector.js

high Shell/command execution in server code (dist/utils/tarball.js)MTC-SRC-002

In the server's implementation (`dist/utils/tarball.js:4`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: { execSync } from 'node:child_process'; import * as tar from 'tar-stream'; /** * Creates a compressed tarball (tar.gz)

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server dist/utils/tarball.js

medium Untrusted input concatenated into a command sink (dist/tools/deploy-to-heroku.js)MTC-SRC-009

In the server's implementation (`dist/tools/deploy-to-heroku.js:247`): A shell/process command assembled from concatenated or interpolated values is command injection when any part is attacker-influenced — the OWASP canonical RCE flow. Verify what reaches the interpolated value. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: try { execSync(`git remote add heroku-${result.name} ${app.git_url}`, { cwd: rootUri }); }

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server dist/tools/deploy-to-heroku.js

low Shell/command execution in packaging/dev tooling (dist/utils/tarball.spec.js)MTC-SRC-002

In a packaging/dev/install script (shipped, but not the server runtime) (`dist/utils/tarball.spec.js:5`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: { execSync } from 'node:child_process'; import { expect } from 'chai'; import { packSources, getSourceFilePaths } from '

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server dist/utils/tarball.spec.js

Tools 37

Each tool and what it can reach — statically extracted from the published source.

  • pg_psqlreads sensitive data
  • create_addonno sensitive capability
  • create_appno sensitive capability
  • deploy_one_off_dynono sensitive capability
  • deploy_to_herokuno sensitive capability
  • get_addon_infono sensitive capability
  • get_app_infono sensitive capability
  • get_app_logsno sensitive capability
  • list_addon_plansno sensitive capability
  • list_addon_servicesno sensitive capability
Show 27 more tools ↓
  • list_addonsno sensitive capability
  • list_ai_available_modelsno sensitive capability
  • list_appsno sensitive capability
  • list_private_spacesno sensitive capability
  • list_teamsno sensitive capability
  • maintenance_offno sensitive capability
  • maintenance_onno sensitive capability
  • make_ai_inferenceno sensitive capability
  • pg_backupsno sensitive capability
  • pg_credentialsno sensitive capability
  • pg_infono sensitive capability
  • pg_killno sensitive capability
  • pg_locksno sensitive capability
  • pg_maintenanceno sensitive capability
  • pg_outliersno sensitive capability
  • pg_psno sensitive capability
  • pg_upgradeno sensitive capability
  • pipelinesno sensitive capability
  • pipelines_createno sensitive capability
  • pipelines_infono sensitive capability
  • pipelines_listno sensitive capability
  • pipelines_promoteno sensitive capability
  • provision_ai_modelno sensitive capability
  • ps_listno sensitive capability
  • ps_restartno sensitive capability
  • ps_scaleno sensitive capability
  • rename_appno sensitive capability

What this scan could not see

Versions 3

Scan history per published version. The engine is deterministic — the same version always yields the same score, so a changed score means the package itself changed.

VersionScoreFindingsEngineScanned
v1.2.7 latest B 88/100 6 1.13.0 2026-09-04
v1.2.6 B 88/100 6 1.13.0 2026-08-25
v1.2.5 B 88/100 6 1.12.1 2026-07-27

Embed this score

Show this server's live Trust Score in your README, docs or website. The badge is served straight from the registry and updates automatically after every rescan — no API key needed. It links back to this page, so anyone who sees the grade can also read the findings behind it instead of taking a number on faith.

MCP Trust Score: B · 88/100
Markdown (GitHub README)
[![MCP Trust Score](https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/heroku-mcp-server/badge.svg)](https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/heroku-mcp-server)
HTML
<a href="https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/heroku-mcp-server"><img src="https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/heroku-mcp-server/badge.svg" alt="MCP Trust Score" height="20"></a>
Prefer shields.io styling? Point it at https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/heroku-mcp-server/badge.json via https://img.shields.io/endpoint?url=…

Verify this score yourself

The score above is reproducible: the same package version always yields the same result. Run it locally or over the free API — no account, no LLM, fully deterministic.

npx mcptrustchecker scan @heroku/mcp-server --online

Use the free API → How scoring works

More in Cloud & DevOps