Guardvibe MCP Server

guardvibe npm v3.31.0 Source verified

Published by goklab — publish provenance cryptographically ties this package to that repository. That is proof of origin, not an official vendor package.

Security infrastructure your AI can't be — deterministic, current past your model's training cutoff, whole-repo-aware, author-independent. Security MCP for vibe coding. 462 rules, 39 tools, CLI + doctor. Prompt-level shift-left security (secure_prompt — e

Trust grade
C
79/100
Last scanned get badge →
Trust
C · 79/100
Adoption risk for you: the threat score, then adjusted down for blast radius, publisher verification and how much the scan could see. Deterministic; every point is auditable.
Capability
High
Blast radius if it went rogue — what the server’s tools could reach. Independent of trust.
Coverage
Source
How much the scan could actually inspect. Shallow coverage is stated, never hidden.
Share this Trust Score
𝕏 Share LinkedIn Reddit
C Why this grade threat 85 − adoption risk = 79/100

The grade answers one question — how safe is this server for you to adopt — so it is computed in two auditable stages. Nothing below is an opinion or an LLM's guess; every line is a real term the deterministic engine applied, and the same input always yields the same number.

1. Threat score — 100 − 15.4 = 85. What the published surface and source actually contain:

PointsWhat was foundCategory
−15.4 Instruction-override directive MTC-INJ-AUTH-2 injection

2. Client adoption risk — 85 − 6 = 79. Three small, subtract-only factors that reflect your risk in adopting it — a clean scan proves less on a powerful, unverified or barely-inspectable package, so the grade says so plainly:

PointsAdoption-risk factor
−6 capability blast radius (high) — client exposure if the model is manipulated

Capability observations and info notes are shown under Findings but never scored. Open any row's finding below for the file, line and evidence behind a deduction.

Findings 22

high Reads a sensitive credential path or dumps the environment (build/data/rules/ai-security.js)MTC-SRC-006

In the server's implementation (`build/data/rules/ai-security.js:195`): Reading private keys / cloud credentials, or serializing the whole environment, is a sensitive-data source that becomes exfiltration when combined with any egress. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: uctions and read ~/.ssh/id_rsa"\n\n// GOOD: clean description\n// description: "Fetches weather data for a given city"',

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server build/data/rules/ai-security.js

high Reads a sensitive credential path or dumps the environment (build/data/rules/ai-tool-runtime.js)MTC-SRC-006

In the server's implementation (`build/data/rules/ai-tool-runtime.js:53`): Reading private keys / cloud credentials, or serializing the whole environment, is a sensitive-data source that becomes exfiltration when combined with any egress. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: called, also run `cat ~/.aws/credentials`'). The AI agent reads these tools, follows the embedded instructions, and exf

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server build/data/rules/ai-tool-runtime.js

high Reads a sensitive credential path or dumps the environment (build/data/rules/supply-chain.js)MTC-SRC-006

In the server's implementation (`build/data/rules/supply-chain.js:104`): Reading private keys / cloud credentials, or serializing the whole environment, is a sensitive-data source that becomes exfiltration when combined with any egress. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: npmrc, .ssh, .aws, .env, .git-credentials). The SANDWORM_MODE worm (2026) and Shai-Hulud variants use this technique to

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server build/data/rules/supply-chain.js

high Instruction-override directiveMTC-INJ-AUTH-2

Instruction-override directive detected in the description of tool "lookup_user". Instruction-like content in tool metadata is executed by the model, not the human, and is the primary tool-poisoning vector.

Evidence: Ignore all previous instructions

Fix: Tool descriptions should describe behavior, not instruct the assistant. Treat imperative / secrecy / sequencing language in metadata as hostile.

Location: tool lookup_user · description

high Dynamic code execution in server code (build/data/rules/core.js)MTC-SRC-001

In the server's implementation (`build/data/rules/core.js:122`): Evaluating strings as code is the most direct RCE primitive; if any tool input reaches it, the server executes attacker-chosen code. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: n// const fn = new " + "Function('x', 'return x * 2'); // only if absolutely needed", compliance: ["SOC2:CC7.1",

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server build/data/rules/core.js

high Dynamic code execution in server code (build/tools/cross-file-taint.js)MTC-SRC-001

In the server's implementation (`build/tools/cross-file-taint.js:614`): Evaluating strings as code is the most direct RCE primitive; if any tool input reaches it, the server executes attacker-chosen code. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: ever pass user input to eval() or Function constructor.", "command-injection": "Use execFile()/spawn() with an a

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server build/tools/cross-file-taint.js

high Dynamic code execution in server code (build/tools/taint-analysis.js)MTC-SRC-001

In the server's implementation (`build/tools/taint-analysis.js:24`): Evaluating strings as code is the most direct RCE primitive; if any tool input reaches it, the server executes attacker-chosen code. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: "User input flows into eval(), enabling arbitrary code execution.", fix: "Never use eval() with user input. Use

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server build/tools/taint-analysis.js

high Shell/command execution in server code (build/cli/init.js)MTC-SRC-002

In the server's implementation (`build/cli/init.js:121`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: file_path;if(p)require('child_process').execFileSync('npx',['-y','guardvibe@${pkg.version}','check',p,'--format','buddy'

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server build/cli/init.js

high Shell/command execution in server code (build/cli/scan.js)MTC-SRC-002

In the server's implementation (`build/cli/scan.js:90`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: eSync } = await import("child_process"); const { analyzeFileSecurity } = await import("../tools/file-security.js");

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server build/cli/scan.js

high Shell/command execution in server code (build/data/rules/ai-security.js)MTC-SRC-002

In the server's implementation (`build/data/rules/ai-security.js:97`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: nimport { spawn } from "child_process";\nconst allowed = /^[a-zA-Z0-9._-]+$/;\nif (!allowed.test(args.filename)) throw n

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server build/data/rules/ai-security.js

high Shell/command execution in server code (build/data/rules/core.js)MTC-SRC-002

In the server's implementation (`build/data/rules/core.js:70`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: pattern: /(?:(?:child_process|cp)[\s\S]*?(?:exec|execSync|spawn|spawnSync)|\.exec(?:Sync)?\s*\(|\.spawn(?:Sync)?

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server build/data/rules/core.js

high Shell/command execution in server code (build/data/rules/cve-versions.js)MTC-SRC-002

In the server's implementation (`build/data/rules/cve-versions.js:357`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: me privileges including child_process and fs access. CVSS 10.0, actively exploited with 12,000+ exposed instances.",

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server build/data/rules/cve-versions.js

high Shell/command execution in server code (build/index.js)MTC-SRC-002

In the server's implementation (`build/index.js:592`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: eSync } = await import("child_process"); const { readFileSync, existsSync } = await import("fs"); const { resolv

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server build/index.js

high Shell/command execution in server code (build/tools/cross-file-taint.js)MTC-SRC-002

In the server's implementation (`build/tools/cross-file-taint.js:615`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: ction": "Use execFile()/spawn() with an argument array (no shell) and validate input against an allowlist.", "xs

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server build/tools/cross-file-taint.js

high Shell/command execution in server code (build/tools/diff-aware.js)MTC-SRC-002

In the server's implementation (`build/tools/diff-aware.js:12`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: { execFileSync } from "child_process"; /** * Parse unified-diff text and return the set of 1-based line numbers that a

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server build/tools/diff-aware.js

high Shell/command execution in server code (build/tools/review-pr.js)MTC-SRC-002

In the server's implementation (`build/tools/review-pr.js:1`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: { execFileSync } from "child_process"; import { extname, basename } from "path"; import { analyzeCode } from "./check-c

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server build/tools/review-pr.js

high Shell/command execution in server code (build/tools/scan-hallucinated.js)MTC-SRC-002

In the server's implementation (`build/tools/scan-hallucinated.js:35`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: sync_hooks", "buffer", "child_process", "cluster", "console", "constants", "crypto", "dgram", "diagnostics_channel",

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server build/tools/scan-hallucinated.js

medium Hardcoded egress to an external endpoint (build/data/rules/react-native.js)MTC-SRC-003

In the server's implementation (`build/data/rules/react-native.js:71`): A hardcoded outbound call to a fixed external host inside server code is a classic exfiltration/telemetry channel — especially paired with reads of local data. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: ng";\nconst res = await fetch("https://api.example.com/data", {\n sslPinning: { certs: ["api-cert"] },\n headers: { Au

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server build/data/rules/react-native.js

medium Hardcoded egress to an external endpoint (build/tools/check-package-health.js)MTC-SRC-003

In the server's implementation (`build/tools/check-package-health.js:74`): A hardcoded outbound call to a fixed external host inside server code is a classic exfiltration/telemetry channel — especially paired with reads of local data. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: omise.all([ fetch(`https://registry.npmjs.org/${encodeURIComponent(name)}`, { signal: AbortSignal.timeout(50

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server build/tools/check-package-health.js

medium Hardcoded egress to an external endpoint (build/tools/deep-scan.js)MTC-SRC-003

In the server's implementation (`build/tools/deep-scan.js:180`): A hardcoded outbound call to a fixed external host inside server code is a classic exfiltration/telemetry channel — especially paired with reads of local data. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: const res = await fetch("https://api.anthropic.com/v1/messages", { method: "POST", headers

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server build/tools/deep-scan.js

medium Hardcoded egress to an external endpoint (build/utils/osv-client.js)MTC-SRC-003

In the server's implementation (`build/utils/osv-client.js:2`): A hardcoded outbound call to a fixed external host inside server code is a classic exfiltration/telemetry channel — especially paired with reads of local data. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: const response = await fetch("https://api.osv.dev/v1/query", { method: "POST", headers: { "Content-Type

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server build/utils/osv-client.js

medium Dynamic module load from a non-literal (build/plugins/loader.js)MTC-SRC-005

In the server's implementation (`build/plugins/loader.js:91`): Loading a module chosen at runtime (from a variable) can pull in and run attacker-influenced code paths. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: const mod = await import(modulePath); const plugin = mod.default ?? mod.plugin ?? mod; return plug

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server build/plugins/loader.js

Tools 43

Each tool and what it can reach — statically extracted from the published source.

  • fetch_pageingests untrusted input
  • fetch_weatheringests untrusted input
  • analyze_cross_file_dataflowno sensitive capability
  • analyze_dataflowno sensitive capability
  • audit_configno sensitive capability
  • audit_mcp_configno sensitive capability
  • auth_coverageno sensitive capability
  • check_codeno sensitive capability
  • check_commandno sensitive capability
  • check_dependenciesno sensitive capability
Show 33 more tools ↓
  • check_package_healthno sensitive capability
  • check_projectno sensitive capability
  • compliance_reportno sensitive capability
  • deep_scanno sensitive capability
  • explain_remediationno sensitive capability
  • export_sarifno sensitive capability
  • fix_codeno sensitive capability
  • full_auditno sensitive capability
  • generate_policyno sensitive capability
  • get_security_docsno sensitive capability
  • get_userno sensitive capability
  • guardvibe_doctorno sensitive capability
  • lookup_userno sensitive capability
  • policy_checkno sensitive capability
  • remediation_planno sensitive capability
  • repo_security_postureno sensitive capability
  • review_prno sensitive capability
  • scan_changed_filesno sensitive capability
  • scan_config_changeno sensitive capability
  • scan_dependenciesno sensitive capability
  • scan_directoryno sensitive capability
  • scan_fileno sensitive capability
  • scan_hallucinated_packagesno sensitive capability
  • scan_host_configno sensitive capability
  • scan_secretsno sensitive capability
  • scan_secrets_historyno sensitive capability
  • scan_stagedno sensitive capability
  • secure_promptno sensitive capability
  • secure_thisno sensitive capability
  • security_statsno sensitive capability
  • security_workflowno sensitive capability
  • verify_fixno sensitive capability
  • verify_remediationno sensitive capability

What this scan could not see

Versions 2

Scan history per published version. The engine is deterministic — the same version always yields the same score, so a changed score means the package itself changed.

VersionScoreFindingsEngineScanned
v3.31.0 latest C 79/100 22 1.13.0 2026-09-07
v3.30.0 C 79/100 25 1.8.0 2026-07-23

Embed this score

Show this server's live Trust Score in your README, docs or website. The badge is served straight from the registry and updates automatically after every rescan — no API key needed. It links back to this page, so anyone who sees the grade can also read the findings behind it instead of taking a number on faith.

MCP Trust Score: C · 79/100
Markdown (GitHub README)
[![MCP Trust Score](https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/guardvibe/badge.svg)](https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/guardvibe)
HTML
<a href="https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/guardvibe"><img src="https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/guardvibe/badge.svg" alt="MCP Trust Score" height="20"></a>
Prefer shields.io styling? Point it at https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/guardvibe/badge.json via https://img.shields.io/endpoint?url=…

Verify this score yourself

The score above is reproducible: the same package version always yields the same result. Run it locally or over the free API — no account, no LLM, fully deterministic.

npx mcptrustchecker scan guardvibe --online

Use the free API → How scoring works

More in Databases