Google Cloud (lockon-n) MCP Server

google-cloud-mcp PyPI v1.0.0

Published by lockon-n — no publish provenance, so origin is unverified, but the source is public: the repository link below is self-declared yet readable, so you can inspect the code before adopting it.

A comprehensive Model Context Protocol (MCP) server for Google Cloud Platform services including BigQuery, Cloud Logging, Cloud Storage, and Compute Engine.

Trust grade
A
93/100
Last scanned get badge →
Trust
A · 93/100
Adoption risk for you: the threat score, then adjusted down for blast radius, publisher verification and how much the scan could see. Deterministic; every point is auditable.
Capability
High
Blast radius if it went rogue — what the server’s tools could reach. Independent of trust.
Coverage
Source
How much the scan could actually inspect. Shallow coverage is stated, never hidden.
Share this Trust Score
𝕏 Share LinkedIn Reddit
A Why this grade threat 100 − adoption risk = 93/100

The grade answers one question — how safe is this server for you to adopt — so it is computed in two auditable stages. Nothing below is an opinion or an LLM's guess; every line is a real term the deterministic engine applied, and the same input always yields the same number.

1. Threat score — 100 − 0 = 100. What the published surface and source actually contain:

The deterministic scan raised no scored threat in the surface it inspected — the threat score stayed at 100. Capability observations and advisory notes are recorded but never lower it.

2. Client adoption risk — 100 − 7 = 93. Three small, subtract-only factors that reflect your risk in adopting it — a clean scan proves less on a powerful, unverified or barely-inspectable package, so the grade says so plainly:

PointsAdoption-risk factor
−6 capability blast radius (high) — client exposure if the model is manipulated
−1 publisher verification (public source) — no provenance, but the source is public and inspectable

Capability observations and info notes are shown under Findings but never scored. Open any row's finding below for the file, line and evidence behind a deduction.

Findings 2

critical Completed toxic-flow trifecta across toolsMTC-FLOW-002

This server (without client built-ins) exposes a complete data-exfiltration chain: storage_download_file → bigquery_run_query → storage_upload_file. Untrusted input is ingested, private data is read, and it can be sent to an external sink via the agent composing the tools (→). Static analysis proves the primitive exists, not that a specific run will occur.

Fix: Remove one leg of the trifecta: isolate untrusted-input tools from secret-reading tools and from egress tools, or require human approval between them.

Location: flow storage_download_file → bigquery_run_query → storage_upload_file

medium Dynamic module load from a non-literal (test_server.py)MTC-SRC-005

In the server's implementation (`test_server.py:30`): Loading a module chosen at runtime (from a variable) can pull in and run attacker-influenced code paths. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: try: __import__(package) print(f" ✅ {package}") except ImportError:

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server test_server.py

Tools 39

Each tool and what it can reach — statically extracted from the published source.

  • bigquery_run_queryreads sensitive data
  • logging_read_logsreads sensitive data
  • storage_download_fileingests untrusted input
  • storage_upload_filenetwork egress
  • bigquery_cancel_jobno sensitive capability
  • bigquery_create_datasetno sensitive capability
  • bigquery_export_tableno sensitive capability
  • bigquery_get_dataset_infono sensitive capability
  • bigquery_list_datasetsno sensitive capability
  • bigquery_list_jobsno sensitive capability
Show 29 more tools ↓
  • bigquery_load_csv_datano sensitive capability
  • compute_create_instanceno sensitive capability
  • compute_delete_instanceno sensitive capability
  • compute_get_instanceno sensitive capability
  • compute_list_instancesno sensitive capability
  • compute_list_zonesno sensitive capability
  • compute_restart_instanceno sensitive capability
  • compute_start_instanceno sensitive capability
  • compute_stop_instanceno sensitive capability
  • compute_wait_for_operationno sensitive capability
  • logging_create_log_bucketno sensitive capability
  • logging_create_log_sinkno sensitive capability
  • logging_delete_logno sensitive capability
  • logging_delete_log_sinkno sensitive capability
  • logging_export_logs_to_bigqueryno sensitive capability
  • logging_list_log_sinksno sensitive capability
  • logging_list_logsno sensitive capability
  • logging_write_logno sensitive capability
  • storage_copy_objectno sensitive capability
  • storage_create_bucketno sensitive capability
  • storage_delete_objectno sensitive capability
  • storage_enable_versioningno sensitive capability
  • storage_generate_signed_urlno sensitive capability
  • storage_get_bucket_infono sensitive capability
  • storage_get_bucket_sizeno sensitive capability
  • storage_list_bucketsno sensitive capability
  • storage_list_objectsno sensitive capability
  • storage_move_objectno sensitive capability
  • storage_set_bucket_lifecycleno sensitive capability

Toxic flows 1

Cross-tool combinations that form a data-exfiltration primitive (untrusted input → sensitive source → external sink).

What this scan could not see

Versions 1

Scan history per published version. The engine is deterministic — the same version always yields the same score, so a changed score means the package itself changed.

VersionScoreFindingsEngineScanned
v1.0.0 latest A 93/100 2 1.13.0 2026-08-25

Embed this score

Show this server's live Trust Score in your README, docs or website. The badge is served straight from the registry and updates automatically after every rescan — no API key needed. It links back to this page, so anyone who sees the grade can also read the findings behind it instead of taking a number on faith.

MCP Trust Score: A · 93/100
Markdown (GitHub README)
[![MCP Trust Score](https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/google-cloud-mcp-2/badge.svg)](https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/google-cloud-mcp-2)
HTML
<a href="https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/google-cloud-mcp-2"><img src="https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/google-cloud-mcp-2/badge.svg" alt="MCP Trust Score" height="20"></a>
Prefer shields.io styling? Point it at https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/google-cloud-mcp-2/badge.json via https://img.shields.io/endpoint?url=…

Verify this score yourself

The score above is reproducible: the same package version always yields the same result. Run it locally or over the free API — no account, no LLM, fully deterministic.

npx mcptrustchecker scan google-cloud-mcp --online --registry pypi

Use the free API → How scoring works

Other implementations of Google Cloud 1

Independent packages implementing the same tool, scanned with the same engine. Compare all 2 side by side →

More in Cloud & DevOps