google-cloud-mcp
PyPI
v1.0.0
Published by lockon-n — no publish provenance, so origin is unverified, but the source is public: the repository link below is self-declared yet readable, so you can inspect the code before adopting it.
A comprehensive Model Context Protocol (MCP) server for Google Cloud Platform services including BigQuery, Cloud Logging, Cloud Storage, and Compute Engine.
The grade answers one question — how safe is this server for you to adopt — so it is computed in two auditable stages. Nothing below is an opinion or an LLM's guess; every line is a real term the deterministic engine applied, and the same input always yields the same number.
1. Threat score — 100 − 0 = 100. What the published surface and source actually contain:
The deterministic scan raised no scored threat in the surface it inspected — the threat score stayed at 100. Capability observations and advisory notes are recorded but never lower it.
2. Client adoption risk — 100 − 7 = 93. Three small, subtract-only factors that reflect your risk in adopting it — a clean scan proves less on a powerful, unverified or barely-inspectable package, so the grade says so plainly:
| Points | Adoption-risk factor |
|---|---|
| −6 | capability blast radius (high) — client exposure if the model is manipulated |
| −1 | publisher verification (public source) — no provenance, but the source is public and inspectable |
Capability observations and info notes are shown under Findings but never scored.
Open any row's finding below for the file, line and evidence behind a deduction.
This server (without client built-ins) exposes a complete data-exfiltration chain: storage_download_file → bigquery_run_query → storage_upload_file. Untrusted input is ingested, private data is read, and it can be sent to an external sink via the agent composing the tools (→). Static analysis proves the primitive exists, not that a specific run will occur.
Fix: Remove one leg of the trifecta: isolate untrusted-input tools from secret-reading tools and from egress tools, or require human approval between them.
Location: flow storage_download_file → bigquery_run_query → storage_upload_file
In the server's implementation (`test_server.py:30`): Loading a module chosen at runtime (from a variable) can pull in and run attacker-influenced code paths. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.
Evidence: try: __import__(package) print(f" ✅ {package}") except ImportError:
Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.
Location: server test_server.py
Each tool and what it can reach — statically extracted from the published source.
bigquery_run_queryreads sensitive datalogging_read_logsreads sensitive datastorage_download_fileingests untrusted inputstorage_upload_filenetwork egressbigquery_cancel_jobno sensitive capabilitybigquery_create_datasetno sensitive capabilitybigquery_export_tableno sensitive capabilitybigquery_get_dataset_infono sensitive capabilitybigquery_list_datasetsno sensitive capabilitybigquery_list_jobsno sensitive capabilitybigquery_load_csv_datano sensitive capabilitycompute_create_instanceno sensitive capabilitycompute_delete_instanceno sensitive capabilitycompute_get_instanceno sensitive capabilitycompute_list_instancesno sensitive capabilitycompute_list_zonesno sensitive capabilitycompute_restart_instanceno sensitive capabilitycompute_start_instanceno sensitive capabilitycompute_stop_instanceno sensitive capabilitycompute_wait_for_operationno sensitive capabilitylogging_create_log_bucketno sensitive capabilitylogging_create_log_sinkno sensitive capabilitylogging_delete_logno sensitive capabilitylogging_delete_log_sinkno sensitive capabilitylogging_export_logs_to_bigqueryno sensitive capabilitylogging_list_log_sinksno sensitive capabilitylogging_list_logsno sensitive capabilitylogging_write_logno sensitive capabilitystorage_copy_objectno sensitive capabilitystorage_create_bucketno sensitive capabilitystorage_delete_objectno sensitive capabilitystorage_enable_versioningno sensitive capabilitystorage_generate_signed_urlno sensitive capabilitystorage_get_bucket_infono sensitive capabilitystorage_get_bucket_sizeno sensitive capabilitystorage_list_bucketsno sensitive capabilitystorage_list_objectsno sensitive capabilitystorage_move_objectno sensitive capabilitystorage_set_bucket_lifecycleno sensitive capabilityCross-tool combinations that form a data-exfiltration primitive (untrusted input → sensitive source → external sink).
Scan history per published version. The engine is deterministic — the same version always yields the same score, so a changed score means the package itself changed.
| Version | Score | Findings | Engine | Scanned |
|---|---|---|---|---|
v1.0.0 latest |
A 93/100 | 2 | 1.13.0 | 2026-08-25 |
Show this server's live Trust Score in your README, docs or website. The badge is served straight from the registry and updates automatically after every rescan — no API key needed. It links back to this page, so anyone who sees the grade can also read the findings behind it instead of taking a number on faith.
The score above is reproducible: the same package version always yields the same result. Run it locally or over the free API — no account, no LLM, fully deterministic.
npx mcptrustchecker scan google-cloud-mcp --online --registry pypi
Independent packages implementing the same tool, scanned with the same engine. Compare all 2 side by side →
Operator control CLI for AdGuard Home with an MCP adapter
interacting with Aliyun (Alibaba Cloud) services through This MCP server provides tools.
MCP server for the Aspro.Cloud REST API
MCP server for Atlassian Confluence and Jira Cloud APIs
AuroraCloud-first MCP server that exposes AuroraDocs workspace data to Claude Desktop and other AI agents
The official AWS Knowledge Base retrieval server using Bedrock Agent Runtime.