Git Commands MCP Server

git-commands-mcp npm v0.1.4

Published by bsreeram08 — no publish provenance, so origin is unverified, but the source is public: the repository link below is self-declared yet readable, so you can inspect the code before adopting it.

Trust grade
B
89/100
Last scanned get badge →
Trust
B · 89/100
Adoption risk for you: the threat score, then adjusted down for blast radius, publisher verification and how much the scan could see. Deterministic; every point is auditable.
Capability
Critical
Blast radius if it went rogue — what the server’s tools could reach. Independent of trust.
Coverage
Source
How much the scan could actually inspect. Shallow coverage is stated, never hidden.
B Why this grade threat 100 − adoption risk = 89/100

The grade answers one question — how safe is this server for you to adopt — so it is computed in two auditable stages. Nothing below is an opinion or an LLM's guess; every line is a real term the deterministic engine applied, and the same input always yields the same number.

1. Threat score — 100 − 0 = 100. What the published surface and source actually contain:

The deterministic scan raised no scored threat in the surface it inspected — the threat score stayed at 100. Capability observations and advisory notes are recorded but never lower it.

2. Client adoption risk — 100 − 11 = 89. Three small, subtract-only factors that reflect your risk in adopting it — a clean scan proves less on a powerful, unverified or barely-inspectable package, so the grade says so plainly:

PointsAdoption-risk factor
−10 capability blast radius (critical) — client exposure if the model is manipulated
−1 publisher verification (public source) — no provenance, but the source is public and inspectable

Capability observations and info notes are shown under Findings but never scored. Open any row's finding below for the file, line and evidence behind a deduction.

Findings 6

critical Completed toxic-flow trifecta across toolsMTC-FLOW-002

This server (without client built-ins) exposes a complete data-exfiltration chain: git_lfs_fetch → git_read_files → git_hooks. Untrusted input is ingested, private data is read, and it can be sent to an external sink via the agent composing the tools (→). Static analysis proves the primitive exists, not that a specific run will occur.

Fix: Remove one leg of the trifecta: isolate untrusted-input tools from secret-reading tools and from egress tools, or require human approval between them.

Location: flow git_lfs_fetch → git_read_files → git_hooks

high Tool "git_hooks" exposes command/code executionMTC-CAP-001

Tool "git_hooks" appears to run shell commands or evaluate code (parameter "script"). Arbitrary execution driven by model input is one of the most dangerous MCP capabilities; combined with any untrusted input it becomes RCE.

Fix: Sandbox execution, allowlist commands/arguments, and never pass model output to a shell unescaped.

Location: tool git_hooks

high Shell/command execution in server code (src/handlers/common.js)MTC-SRC-002

In the server's implementation (`src/handlers/common.js:4`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: ; import { exec } from "child_process"; import { promisify } from "util"; import { cloneRepo, getDirectoryTree } from ".

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server src/handlers/common.js

medium Unconstrained command parameter "script" on "git_hooks"MTC-CAP-006

Tool "git_hooks" takes a command-shaped parameter "script" with no enum/pattern constraint. Free-form, model- or attacker-controlled arguments reaching a shell is the command-injection precondition.

Fix: Constrain the parameter (enum/pattern), or build the command from a fixed template with escaped args.

Location: tool git_hooks · inputSchema.properties.script

low Mutating tool "git_hooks" declares no destructiveHintMTC-CAP-005

Tool "git_hooks" can mutate/egress but declares no destructiveHint. Clients that don't default to spec-safe behavior may not prompt before running it.

Fix: Declare accurate annotations, and gate destructive tools on user confirmation regardless.

Location: tool git_hooks

low Unconstrained path parameter "file_paths" on "git_read_files"MTC-CAP-008

Tool "git_read_files" takes a path parameter "file_paths" with no constraint. Without a canonicalize-and-contain check (not visible statically), this permits ../ traversal outside the intended root.

Fix: Resolve and verify the path stays within an allowed root; reject traversal sequences.

Location: tool git_read_files · inputSchema.properties.file_paths

Tools 27

Each tool and what it can reach — statically extracted from the published source.

  • git_hooksruns code / shell
  • git_lfs_fetchingests untrusted input
  • git_read_filesreads sensitive data
  • git_archiveno sensitive capability
  • git_attributesno sensitive capability
  • git_blameno sensitive capability
  • git_branch_diffno sensitive capability
  • git_checkout_branchno sensitive capability
  • git_cleanno sensitive capability
  • git_commitno sensitive capability
Show 17 more tools ↓
  • git_commit_historyno sensitive capability
  • git_commits_detailsno sensitive capability
  • git_configno sensitive capability
  • git_create_tagno sensitive capability
  • git_delete_branchno sensitive capability
  • git_directory_structureno sensitive capability
  • git_lfsno sensitive capability
  • git_local_changesno sensitive capability
  • git_merge_branchno sensitive capability
  • git_pullno sensitive capability
  • git_pushno sensitive capability
  • git_rebaseno sensitive capability
  • git_resetno sensitive capability
  • git_revertno sensitive capability
  • git_search_codeno sensitive capability
  • git_stashno sensitive capability
  • git_trackno sensitive capability

Toxic flows 1

Cross-tool combinations that form a data-exfiltration primitive (untrusted input → sensitive source → external sink).

What this scan could not see

Versions 1

Scan history per published version. The engine is deterministic — the same version always yields the same score, so a changed score means the package itself changed.

VersionScoreFindingsEngineScanned
v0.1.4 latest B 89/100 6 1.9.0 2026-07-24

Embed this score

Show this server's live Trust Score in your README, docs or website. The badge is served straight from the registry and updates automatically after every rescan — no API key needed. It links back to this page, so anyone who sees the grade can also read the findings behind it instead of taking a number on faith.

MCP Trust Score: B · 89/100
Markdown (GitHub README)
[![MCP Trust Score](https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/git-commands-mcp/badge.svg)](https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/git-commands-mcp)
HTML
<a href="https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/git-commands-mcp"><img src="https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/git-commands-mcp/badge.svg" alt="MCP Trust Score" height="20"></a>
Prefer shields.io styling? Point it at https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/git-commands-mcp/badge.json via https://img.shields.io/endpoint?url=…

Verify this score yourself

The score above is reproducible: the same package version always yields the same result. Run it locally or over the free API — no account, no LLM, fully deterministic.

npx mcptrustchecker scan git-commands-mcp --online

Use the free API → How scoring works

More in Developer Tools