Figbridge MCP Server

figbridge-mcp npm v0.4.0 Source verified

Published by rudraptpsingh — publish provenance cryptographically ties this package to that repository. That is proof of origin, not an official vendor package.

Free, local MCP bridge for Figbridge — exposes Figma → HTML/CSS/Tailwind/tokens to AI agents.

Trust grade
A
94/100
Last scanned get badge →
Trust
A · 94/100
Adoption risk for you: the threat score, then adjusted down for blast radius, publisher verification and how much the scan could see. Deterministic; every point is auditable.
Capability
High
Blast radius if it went rogue — what the server’s tools could reach. Independent of trust.
Coverage
Source
How much the scan could actually inspect. Shallow coverage is stated, never hidden.
Share this Trust Score
𝕏 Share LinkedIn Reddit
A Why this grade threat 100 − adoption risk = 94/100

The grade answers one question — how safe is this server for you to adopt — so it is computed in two auditable stages. Nothing below is an opinion or an LLM's guess; every line is a real term the deterministic engine applied, and the same input always yields the same number.

1. Threat score — 100 − 0 = 100. What the published surface and source actually contain:

The deterministic scan raised no scored threat in the surface it inspected — the threat score stayed at 100. Capability observations and advisory notes are recorded but never lower it.

2. Client adoption risk — 100 − 6 = 94. Three small, subtract-only factors that reflect your risk in adopting it — a clean scan proves less on a powerful, unverified or barely-inspectable package, so the grade says so plainly:

PointsAdoption-risk factor
−6 capability blast radius (high) — client exposure if the model is manipulated

Capability observations and info notes are shown under Findings but never scored. Open any row's finding below for the file, line and evidence behind a deduction.

Findings 6

high Sensitive-source and external-sink co-existMTC-FLOW-004

Tools that read sensitive data ([get_tokens]) and tools that can send data out ([run_script]) are exposed together. An agent can move private data to the sink.

Evidence: sources [get_tokens] → sinks [run_script]

Fix: Keep secret-reading and egress capabilities on separate, separately-approved servers.

Location: flow get_tokens → run_script

high Tool "run_script" exposes command/code executionMTC-CAP-001

Tool "run_script" appears to run shell commands or evaluate code (keyword "run_script" in tool name). Arbitrary execution driven by model input is one of the most dangerous MCP capabilities; combined with any untrusted input it becomes RCE.

Fix: Sandbox execution, allowlist commands/arguments, and never pass model output to a shell unescaped.

Location: tool run_script

high Dynamic code execution in server code (src/browser.js)MTC-SRC-001

In the server's implementation (`src/browser.js:490`): Evaluating strings as code is the most direct RCE primitive; if any tool input reaches it, the server executes attacker-chosen code. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: urn await page.evaluate(new Function(`return (async () => { ${script} })()`)); } finally { try { await page.close(

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server src/browser.js

high Shell/command execution in server code (src/doctor.js)MTC-SRC-002

In the server's implementation (`src/doctor.js:11`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: _execFile } from "node:child_process"; import { promisify } from "node:util"; import http from "node:http"; const execF

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server src/doctor.js

high Shell/command execution in server code (src/init.js)MTC-SRC-002

In the server's implementation (`src/init.js:5`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: { execSync } from "node:child_process"; import { fileURLToPath } from "node:url"; const GREEN = "\x1b[32m"; const YELLO

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server src/init.js

low Mutating tool "run_script" declares no destructiveHintMTC-CAP-005

Tool "run_script" can mutate/egress but declares no destructiveHint. Clients that don't default to spec-safe behavior may not prompt before running it.

Fix: Declare accurate annotations, and gate destructive tools on user confirmation regardless.

Location: tool run_script

Tools 51

Each tool and what it can reach — statically extracted from the published source.

  • get_tokensreads sensitive data
  • run_scriptruns code / shell
  • apply_tokensno sensitive capability
  • audit_a11yno sensitive capability
  • audit_interactionsno sensitive capability
  • audit_mobileno sensitive capability
  • audit_paletteno sensitive capability
  • audit_regressionno sensitive capability
  • audit_typographyno sensitive capability
  • audit_whitespaceno sensitive capability
Show 41 more tools ↓
  • bridge_statusno sensitive capability
  • clone_screenno sensitive capability
  • delete_nodeno sensitive capability
  • demarcateno sensitive capability
  • describe_screenno sensitive capability
  • diff_imagesno sensitive capability
  • diff_sinceno sensitive capability
  • diff_specsno sensitive capability
  • diff_to_sourceno sensitive capability
  • export_all_pagesno sensitive capability
  • export_app_specno sensitive capability
  • export_frameno sensitive capability
  • export_nodeno sensitive capability
  • fingerprint_urlno sensitive capability
  • generate_patchno sensitive capability
  • get_agent_bundleno sensitive capability
  • get_current_selectionno sensitive capability
  • get_last_exportno sensitive capability
  • import_from_codeno sensitive capability
  • import_responsive_setno sensitive capability
  • import_urlno sensitive capability
  • import_url_batchno sensitive capability
  • lint_dsno sensitive capability
  • list_assetsno sensitive capability
  • list_componentsno sensitive capability
  • list_framesno sensitive capability
  • list_historyno sensitive capability
  • list_pagesno sensitive capability
  • list_screensno sensitive capability
  • map_componentsno sensitive capability
  • match_mockupno sensitive capability
  • measure_fidelityno sensitive capability
  • measure_layoutno sensitive capability
  • preflight_importno sensitive capability
  • probe_urlno sensitive capability
  • recolorno sensitive capability
  • screenshot_urlno sensitive capability
  • select_nodeno sensitive capability
  • update_from_codeno sensitive capability
  • verify_text_fidelityno sensitive capability
  • visual_diffno sensitive capability

Toxic flows 1

Cross-tool combinations that form a data-exfiltration primitive (untrusted input → sensitive source → external sink).

What this scan could not see

Versions 1

Scan history per published version. The engine is deterministic — the same version always yields the same score, so a changed score means the package itself changed.

VersionScoreFindingsEngineScanned
v0.4.0 latest A 94/100 6 1.13.0 2026-09-08

Embed this score

Show this server's live Trust Score in your README, docs or website. The badge is served straight from the registry and updates automatically after every rescan — no API key needed. It links back to this page, so anyone who sees the grade can also read the findings behind it instead of taking a number on faith.

MCP Trust Score: A · 94/100
Markdown (GitHub README)
[![MCP Trust Score](https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/figbridge-mcp/badge.svg)](https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/figbridge-mcp)
HTML
<a href="https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/figbridge-mcp"><img src="https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/figbridge-mcp/badge.svg" alt="MCP Trust Score" height="20"></a>
Prefer shields.io styling? Point it at https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/figbridge-mcp/badge.json via https://img.shields.io/endpoint?url=…

Verify this score yourself

The score above is reproducible: the same package version always yields the same result. Run it locally or over the free API — no account, no LLM, fully deterministic.

npx mcptrustchecker scan figbridge-mcp --online

Use the free API → How scoring works

More in Design & Media