Exarp MCP Server

exarp PyPI v0.2.2

Published by davidl71 — no publish provenance, so origin is unverified, but the source is public: the repository link below is self-declared yet readable, so you can inspect the code before adopting it.

MCP server for project management automation - health scores, task alignment, security scanning

Trust grade
A
93/100
Last scanned get badge →
Trust
A · 93/100
Adoption risk for you: the threat score, then adjusted down for blast radius, publisher verification and how much the scan could see. Deterministic; every point is auditable.
Capability
High
Blast radius if it went rogue — what the server’s tools could reach. Independent of trust.
Coverage
Source
How much the scan could actually inspect. Shallow coverage is stated, never hidden.
Share this Trust Score
𝕏 Share LinkedIn Reddit
A Why this grade threat 100 − adoption risk = 93/100

The grade answers one question — how safe is this server for you to adopt — so it is computed in two auditable stages. Nothing below is an opinion or an LLM's guess; every line is a real term the deterministic engine applied, and the same input always yields the same number.

1. Threat score — 100 − 0 = 100. What the published surface and source actually contain:

The deterministic scan raised no scored threat in the surface it inspected — the threat score stayed at 100. Capability observations and advisory notes are recorded but never lower it.

2. Client adoption risk — 100 − 7 = 93. Three small, subtract-only factors that reflect your risk in adopting it — a clean scan proves less on a powerful, unverified or barely-inspectable package, so the grade says so plainly:

PointsAdoption-risk factor
−6 capability blast radius (high) — client exposure if the model is manipulated
−1 publisher verification (public source) — no provenance, but the source is public and inspectable

Capability observations and info notes are shown under Findings but never scored. Open any row's finding below for the file, line and evidence behind a deduction.

Findings 13

high Reads a sensitive credential path or dumps the environment (project_management_automation/middleware/path_validation.py)MTC-SRC-006

In the server's implementation (`project_management_automation/middleware/path_validation.py:68`): Reading private keys / cloud credentials, or serializing the whole environment, is a sensitive-data source that becomes exfiltration when combined with any egress. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: r"\.aws", r"id_rsa", r"\.pem$", r"secrets?\.ya?ml", ] self._compiled

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server project_management_automation/middleware/path_validation.py

high Reads a sensitive credential path or dumps the environment (project_management_automation/server.py)MTC-SRC-006

In the server's implementation (`project_management_automation/server.py:112`): Reading private keys / cloud credentials, or serializing the whole environment, is a sensitive-data source that becomes exfiltration when combined with any egress. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: S credentials r"id_rsa", # SSH private keys r"\.pem$", # Certificate files r"secrets?\.ya?ml",

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server project_management_automation/server.py

high Reads a sensitive credential path or dumps the environment (project_management_automation/utils/security.py)MTC-SRC-006

In the server's implementation (`project_management_automation/utils/security.py:65`): Reading private keys / cloud credentials, or serializing the whole environment, is a sensitive-data source that becomes exfiltration when combined with any egress. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: GPG keys r'id_rsa', # SSH private keys r'\.pem$', # Certificate files

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server project_management_automation/utils/security.py

high Shell/command execution in server code (project_management_automation/resources/catalog.py)MTC-SRC-002

In the server's implementation (`project_management_automation/resources/catalog.py:215`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: y: result = subprocess.run( [linter, '--version'], capture_output=True,

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server project_management_automation/resources/catalog.py

high Shell/command execution in server code (project_management_automation/server.py)MTC-SRC-002

In the server's implementation (`project_management_automation/server.py:3385`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: rompt() def exec() -> str: """Executive/Stakeholder workflow for strategic view."""

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server project_management_automation/server.py

high Shell/command execution in server code (project_management_automation/tools/batch_task_approval.py)MTC-SRC-002

In the server's implementation (`project_management_automation/tools/batch_task_approval.py:87`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: preview_result = subprocess.run( preview_cmd, cwd=str(project_root),

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server project_management_automation/tools/batch_task_approval.py

high Shell/command execution in server code (project_management_automation/tools/codeql_security.py)MTC-SRC-002

In the server's implementation (`project_management_automation/tools/codeql_security.py:233`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: try: result = subprocess.run( ['git', 'remote', 'get-url', 'origin'], capture_output=T

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server project_management_automation/tools/codeql_security.py

low Shell/command execution in packaging/dev tooling (project_management_automation/scripts/automate_daily.py)MTC-SRC-002

In a packaging/dev/install script (shipped, but not the server runtime) (`project_management_automation/scripts/automate_daily.py:247`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: pt result = subprocess.run( cmd, capture_output=True, text=T

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server project_management_automation/scripts/automate_daily.py

low Shell/command execution in packaging/dev tooling (project_management_automation/scripts/automate_dependency_security.py)MTC-SRC-002

In a packaging/dev/install script (shipped, but not the server runtime) (`project_management_automation/scripts/automate_dependency_security.py:173`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: result = subprocess.run(cmd, capture_output=True, text=True, timeout=300) if result.retu

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server project_management_automation/scripts/automate_dependency_security.py

low Shell/command execution in packaging/dev tooling (project_management_automation/scripts/automate_docs_health_v2.py)MTC-SRC-002

In a packaging/dev/install script (shipped, but not the server runtime) (`project_management_automation/scripts/automate_docs_health_v2.py:168`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: result = subprocess.run( [sys.executable, str(self.project_root / 'scripts' / 'valida

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server project_management_automation/scripts/automate_docs_health_v2.py

low Shell/command execution in packaging/dev tooling (project_management_automation/scripts/automate_run_tests.py)MTC-SRC-002

In a packaging/dev/install script (shipped, but not the server runtime) (`project_management_automation/scripts/automate_run_tests.py:129`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: md)}") result = subprocess.run( cmd, cwd=str(self.project_root), capture_out

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server project_management_automation/scripts/automate_run_tests.py

low Shell/command execution in packaging/dev tooling (project_management_automation/scripts/automate_sprint.py)MTC-SRC-002

In a packaging/dev/install script (shipped, but not the server runtime) (`project_management_automation/scripts/automate_sprint.py:400`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: es result = subprocess.run( ['git', 'log', '--pretty=format:%s', '-50'], cwd

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server project_management_automation/scripts/automate_sprint.py

low Shell/command execution in packaging/dev tooling (project_management_automation/scripts/automate_test_coverage.py)MTC-SRC-002

In a packaging/dev/install script (shipped, but not the server runtime) (`project_management_automation/scripts/automate_test_coverage.py:136`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: )] result = subprocess.run( cmd, cwd=str(self.project_root),

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server project_management_automation/scripts/automate_test_coverage.py

Tools 51

Each tool and what it can reach — statically extracted from the published source.

  • list_mlx_models_toolingests untrusted input
  • pull_ollama_model_toolingests untrusted input
  • add_external_tool_hintsno sensitive capability
  • analyze_alignmentno sensitive capability
  • analyze_code_quality_toolno sensitive capability
  • auto_prime_sessionno sensitive capability
  • automationno sensitive capability
  • check_attributionno sensitive capability
  • check_mlx_status_toolno sensitive capability
  • check_ollama_status_toolno sensitive capability
Show 41 more tools ↓
  • compare_task_diff_toolno sensitive capability
  • contextno sensitive capability
  • enhance_context_summary_toolno sensitive capability
  • estimationno sensitive capability
  • exarp_session_handoffno sensitive capability
  • find_promptsno sensitive capability
  • generate_code_documentation_toolno sensitive capability
  • generate_configno sensitive capability
  • generate_graph_toolno sensitive capability
  • generate_with_mlx_toolno sensitive capability
  • generate_with_ollama_toolno sensitive capability
  • get_branch_commits_toolno sensitive capability
  • get_branch_tasks_toolno sensitive capability
  • get_hardware_info_toolno sensitive capability
  • get_mlx_hardware_info_toolno sensitive capability
  • get_task_commits_toolno sensitive capability
  • get_task_contextno sensitive capability
  • healthno sensitive capability
  • infer_session_modeno sensitive capability
  • lintno sensitive capability
  • list_branches_toolno sensitive capability
  • list_ollama_models_toolno sensitive capability
  • memoryno sensitive capability
  • memory_maintno sensitive capability
  • merge_branch_tools_toolno sensitive capability
  • my_toolno sensitive capability
  • prompt_trackingno sensitive capability
  • recommendno sensitive capability
  • reportno sensitive capability
  • scan_filesno sensitive capability
  • securityno sensitive capability
  • server_statusno sensitive capability
  • set_task_branchno sensitive capability
  • setup_hooksno sensitive capability
  • task_analysisno sensitive capability
  • task_assignee_toolno sensitive capability
  • task_discoveryno sensitive capability
  • task_workflowno sensitive capability
  • testingno sensitive capability
  • tool_catalogno sensitive capability
  • workflow_modeno sensitive capability

What this scan could not see

Versions 1

Scan history per published version. The engine is deterministic — the same version always yields the same score, so a changed score means the package itself changed.

VersionScoreFindingsEngineScanned
v0.2.2 latest A 93/100 13 1.13.0 2026-08-25

Embed this score

Show this server's live Trust Score in your README, docs or website. The badge is served straight from the registry and updates automatically after every rescan — no API key needed. It links back to this page, so anyone who sees the grade can also read the findings behind it instead of taking a number on faith.

MCP Trust Score: A · 93/100
Markdown (GitHub README)
[![MCP Trust Score](https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/exarp/badge.svg)](https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/exarp)
HTML
<a href="https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/exarp"><img src="https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/exarp/badge.svg" alt="MCP Trust Score" height="20"></a>
Prefer shields.io styling? Point it at https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/exarp/badge.json via https://img.shields.io/endpoint?url=…

Verify this score yourself

The score above is reproducible: the same package version always yields the same result. Run it locally or over the free API — no account, no LLM, fully deterministic.

npx mcptrustchecker scan exarp --online --registry pypi

Use the free API → How scoring works

More in Productivity & Workflow