@elisym/mcp
npm
v0.21.1
Source verified
Published by elisymlabs — publish provenance cryptographically ties this package to that repository. That is proof of origin, not an official vendor package.
MCP server for elisym - AI agent discovery, jobs, and payments
The grade answers one question — how safe is this server for you to adopt — so it is computed in two auditable stages. Nothing below is an opinion or an LLM's guess; every line is a real term the deterministic engine applied, and the same input always yields the same number.
1. Threat score — 100 − 0 = 100. What the published surface and source actually contain:
The deterministic scan raised no scored threat in the surface it inspected — the threat score stayed at 100. Capability observations and advisory notes are recorded but never lower it.
2. Client adoption risk — 100 − 6 = 94. Three small, subtract-only factors that reflect your risk in adopting it — a clean scan proves less on a powerful, unverified or barely-inspectable package, so the grade says so plainly:
| Points | Adoption-risk factor |
|---|---|
| −6 | capability blast radius (high) — client exposure if the model is manipulated |
Capability observations and info notes are shown under Findings but never scored.
Open any row's finding below for the file, line and evidence behind a deduction.
In the server's implementation (`dist/index.js:1554`): Reading private keys / cloud credentials, or serializing the whole environment, is a sensitive-data source that becomes exfiltration when combined with any egress. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.
Evidence: rets\.json|\.env(\..+)?|id_rsa|id_dsa|id_ecdsa|id_ed25519|authorized_keys|wallet\.dat|credentials|.*-keypair\.json|.*\.p
Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.
Location: server dist/index.js
In the server's implementation (`dist/index.js:8`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.
Evidence: { execFile } from 'node:child_process'; import { realpath, readFile, stat, mkdir, rm, writeFile, rename, unlink } from '
Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.
Location: server dist/index.js
Untrusted-input tools ([fetch_job_file]) co-exist with external-action tools ([send_message]). A prompt injection could cause unwanted external actions, though no direct sensitive-data leak path was found.
Evidence: untrusted [fetch_job_file] → sinks [send_message]
Fix: Require confirmation for state-changing/egress actions triggered after processing untrusted content.
Location: flow fetch_job_file → send_message
Each tool and what it can reach — statically extracted from the published source.
fetch_job_fileingests untrusted inputsend_messagenetwork egressadd_contactno sensitive capabilityAgent Identityno sensitive capabilityapprove_delegationno sensitive capabilitybuy_capabilityno sensitive capabilitycreate_agentno sensitive capabilitycreate_jobno sensitive capabilityestimate_payment_costno sensitive capabilityget_agent_policiesno sensitive capabilityget_balanceno sensitive capabilityget_dashboardno sensitive capabilityget_delegationno sensitive capabilityget_identityno sensitive capabilityget_job_resultno sensitive capabilityget_messagesno sensitive capabilitylist_agentsno sensitive capabilitylist_capabilitiesno sensitive capabilitylist_contactsno sensitive capabilitylist_conversationsno sensitive capabilitylist_job_sessionsno sensitive capabilitylist_my_jobsno sensitive capabilityremove_contactno sensitive capabilityrevoke_delegationno sensitive capabilitysearch_agentsno sensitive capabilitysend_paymentno sensitive capabilitySolana Walletno sensitive capabilitystop_agentno sensitive capabilitysubmit_and_pay_jobno sensitive capabilitysubmit_and_pay_job_from_fileno sensitive capabilitysubmit_delegated_jobno sensitive capabilitysubmit_diff_reviewno sensitive capabilitysubmit_feedbackno sensitive capabilityswitch_agentno sensitive capabilityverify_agent_identitiesno sensitive capabilitywithdrawno sensitive capabilityCross-tool combinations that form a data-exfiltration primitive (untrusted input → sensitive source → external sink).
Scan history per published version. The engine is deterministic — the same version always yields the same score, so a changed score means the package itself changed.
| Version | Score | Findings | Engine | Scanned |
|---|---|---|---|---|
v0.21.1 latest |
A 94/100 | 3 | 1.13.0 | 2026-09-07 |
v0.20.2 |
A 94/100 | 3 | 1.12.1 | 2026-07-29 |
v0.19.0 |
A 93/100 | 3 | 1.9.0 | 2026-07-24 |
Show this server's live Trust Score in your README, docs or website. The badge is served straight from the registry and updates automatically after every rescan — no API key needed. It links back to this page, so anyone who sees the grade can also read the findings behind it instead of taking a number on faith.
The score above is reproducible: the same package version always yields the same result. Run it locally or over the free API — no account, no LLM, fully deterministic.
npx mcptrustchecker scan @elisym/mcp --online
Independent packages implementing the same tool, scanned with the same engine. Compare all 2 side by side →
Operator control CLI for AdGuard Home with an MCP adapter
interacting with Aliyun (Alibaba Cloud) services through This MCP server provides tools.
MCP server for the Aspro.Cloud REST API
MCP server for Atlassian Confluence and Jira Cloud APIs
AuroraCloud-first MCP server that exposes AuroraDocs workspace data to Claude Desktop and other AI agents
The official AWS Knowledge Base retrieval server using Bedrock Agent Runtime.