El Gringo MCP Server

el-gringo PyPI v1.1.0

Published by thegringo-ai — no publish provenance, so origin is unverified, but the source is public: the repository link below is self-declared yet readable, so you can inspect the code before adopting it.

Trust grade
A
93/100
Last scanned get badge →
Trust
A · 93/100
Adoption risk for you: the threat score, then adjusted down for blast radius, publisher verification and how much the scan could see. Deterministic; every point is auditable.
Capability
High
Blast radius if it went rogue — what the server’s tools could reach. Independent of trust.
Coverage
Source
How much the scan could actually inspect. Shallow coverage is stated, never hidden.
A Why this grade threat 100 − adoption risk = 93/100

The grade answers one question — how safe is this server for you to adopt — so it is computed in two auditable stages. Nothing below is an opinion or an LLM's guess; every line is a real term the deterministic engine applied, and the same input always yields the same number.

1. Threat score — 100 − 0 = 100. What the published surface and source actually contain:

The deterministic scan raised no scored threat in the surface it inspected — the threat score stayed at 100. Capability observations and advisory notes are recorded but never lower it.

2. Client adoption risk — 100 − 7 = 93. Three small, subtract-only factors that reflect your risk in adopting it — a clean scan proves less on a powerful, unverified or barely-inspectable package, so the grade says so plainly:

PointsAdoption-risk factor
−6 capability blast radius (high) — client exposure if the model is manipulated
−1 publisher verification (public source) — no provenance, but the source is public and inspectable

Capability observations and info notes are shown under Findings but never scored. Open any row's finding below for the file, line and evidence behind a deduction.

Findings 14

high Reads a sensitive credential path or dumps the environment (elgringo/tools/base.py)MTC-SRC-006

In the server's implementation (`elgringo/tools/base.py:102`): Reading private keys / cloud credentials, or serializing the whole environment, is a sensitive-data source that becomes exfiltration when combined with any egress. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: "~/.ssh", "~/.gnupg", "~/.aws/credentials", "/System", "/Library", "/bin", "/sbin", "/usr/bin", ] # Def

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server elgringo/tools/base.py

high Dynamic code execution in server code (elgringo/intelligence/auto_failure_detector.py)MTC-SRC-001

In the server's implementation (`elgringo/intelligence/auto_failure_detector.py:87`): Evaluating strings as code is the most direct RCE primitive; if any tool input reaches it, the server executes attacker-chosen code. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: (r'eval\s*\(', "Use of eval() is a security risk", "critical"), (r'exec\s*\(', "Use of exec() is a security ris

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server elgringo/intelligence/auto_failure_detector.py

high Dynamic code execution in server code (elgringo/validation/code_validator.py)MTC-SRC-001

In the server's implementation (`elgringo/validation/code_validator.py:286`): Evaluating strings as code is the most direct RCE primitive; if any tool input reaches it, the server executes attacker-chosen code. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: ', "Use of eval() is a security risk", "Avoid eval() - use safer alternatives like ast.literal

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server elgringo/validation/code_validator.py

high Shell/command execution in server code (elgringo/agents/specialists.py)MTC-SRC-002

In the server's implementation (`elgringo/agents/specialists.py:210`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: mand_injection": "Avoid shell=True, use subprocess with list arguments, validate and sanitize inputs", "xss_

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server elgringo/agents/specialists.py

high Shell/command execution in server code (elgringo/apple/apple_shortcuts.py)MTC-SRC-002

In the server's implementation (`elgringo/apple/apple_shortcuts.py:210`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: y: result = subprocess.run( ["shortcuts", "list"], capture_output=True,

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server elgringo/apple/apple_shortcuts.py

high Shell/command execution in server code (elgringo/apple/coreml_agent.py)MTC-SRC-002

In the server's implementation (`elgringo/apple/coreml_agent.py:113`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: y: result = subprocess.run( ["sysctl", "-n", "machdep.cpu.brand_string"], ca

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server elgringo/apple/coreml_agent.py

high Shell/command execution in server code (elgringo/apple/mlx_inference.py)MTC-SRC-002

In the server's implementation (`elgringo/apple/mlx_inference.py:147`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: ss result = subprocess.run( ["vm_stat"], capture_output=True, text=True, timeout=2,

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server elgringo/apple/mlx_inference.py

high Shell/command execution in server code (elgringo/apple/model_setup.py)MTC-SRC-002

In the server's implementation (`elgringo/apple/model_setup.py:44`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: try: result = subprocess.run( ["ollama", "list"], capture_output=True, text=True, time

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server elgringo/apple/model_setup.py

high Shell/command execution in server code (elgringo/apple/smart_router.py)MTC-SRC-002

In the server's implementation (`elgringo/apple/smart_router.py:87`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: p info result = subprocess.run( ["sysctl", "-n", "machdep.cpu.brand_string"], capture_ou

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server elgringo/apple/smart_router.py

high Shell/command execution in server code (elgringo/autonomous/file_watcher.py)MTC-SRC-002

In the server's implementation (`elgringo/autonomous/file_watcher.py:733`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: ts result = subprocess.run( ["git", "log", "--name-only", "--pretty=format:", "-n", "20"],

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server elgringo/autonomous/file_watcher.py

high Shell/command execution in server code (elgringo/cli/cli.py)MTC-SRC-002

In the server's implementation (`elgringo/cli/cli.py:229`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: ss result = subprocess.run( ["ollama", "list"], capture_output=True,

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server elgringo/cli/cli.py

high Shell/command execution in server code (elgringo/cli/context.py)MTC-SRC-002

In the server's implementation (`elgringo/cli/context.py:105`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: try: git_root = subprocess.run( ["git", "rev-parse", "--show-toplevel"], capture_output=

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server elgringo/cli/context.py

high Shell/command execution in server code (elgringo/cli/setup.py)MTC-SRC-002

In the server's implementation (`elgringo/cli/setup.py:208`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: try: result = subprocess.run( ["ollama", "list"], capture_output=True, text=True, timeout=5

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server elgringo/cli/setup.py

medium Hardcoded egress to an external endpoint (elgringo/business_suite/integrations.py)MTC-SRC-003

In the server's implementation (`elgringo/business_suite/integrations.py:425`): A hardcoded outbound call to a fixed external host inside server code is a classic exfiltration/telemetry channel — especially paired with reads of local data. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: rt requests response = requests.post( "https://api.aiteamstudio.com/v1/chat", headers={{ "Authorization

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server elgringo/business_suite/integrations.py

Tools 65

Each tool and what it can reach — statically extracted from the published source.

  • ai_team_agent_insightsno sensitive capability
  • ai_team_apple_infono sensitive capability
  • ai_team_approval_createno sensitive capability
  • ai_team_approval_decideno sensitive capability
  • ai_team_approval_listno sensitive capability
  • ai_team_arbitrageno sensitive capability
  • ai_team_architectno sensitive capability
  • ai_team_brainstormno sensitive capability
  • ai_team_buildno sensitive capability
  • ai_team_cache_statsno sensitive capability
Show 55 more tools ↓
  • ai_team_code_analysisno sensitive capability
  • ai_team_costsno sensitive capability
  • ai_team_debugno sensitive capability
  • ai_team_executeno sensitive capability
  • ai_team_generateno sensitive capability
  • ai_team_generate_appno sensitive capability
  • ai_team_guardianno sensitive capability
  • ai_team_healthno sensitive capability
  • ai_team_knowledge_storeno sensitive capability
  • ai_team_leaderboardno sensitive capability
  • ai_team_mlx_generateno sensitive capability
  • ai_team_nexus_patternsno sensitive capability
  • ai_team_nexus_searchno sensitive capability
  • ai_team_parallel_reviewno sensitive capability
  • ai_team_performance_reportno sensitive capability
  • ai_team_provider_compareno sensitive capability
  • ai_team_quality_watchdogno sensitive capability
  • ai_team_rateno sensitive capability
  • ai_team_reviewno sensitive capability
  • ai_team_roino sensitive capability
  • ai_team_scan_responseno sensitive capability
  • ai_team_schemasno sensitive capability
  • ai_team_security_auditno sensitive capability
  • ai_team_semantic_diffno sensitive capability
  • ai_team_structuredno sensitive capability
  • ai_team_teachno sensitive capability
  • ai_team_transparencyno sensitive capability
  • ai_team_workflowno sensitive capability
  • claude_contextno sensitive capability
  • claude_reflectno sensitive capability
  • claude_second_opinionno sensitive capability
  • elgringo_askno sensitive capability
  • elgringo_changelogno sensitive capability
  • elgringo_code_taskno sensitive capability
  • elgringo_collaborateno sensitive capability
  • elgringo_debateno sensitive capability
  • elgringo_deploy_checkno sensitive capability
  • elgringo_diagnoseno sensitive capability
  • elgringo_feedbackno sensitive capability
  • elgringo_onboardno sensitive capability
  • elgringo_planno sensitive capability
  • elgringo_project_infono sensitive capability
  • elgringo_project_registerno sensitive capability
  • elgringo_refactorno sensitive capability
  • elgringo_reviewno sensitive capability
  • elgringo_streamno sensitive capability
  • elgringo_test_generateno sensitive capability
  • fredfix_scanno sensitive capability
  • memory_searchno sensitive capability
  • memory_statsno sensitive capability
  • memory_store_mistakeno sensitive capability
  • memory_store_solutionno sensitive capability
  • mlx_askno sensitive capability
  • mlx_statusno sensitive capability
  • verify_codeno sensitive capability

What this scan could not see

Versions 1

Scan history per published version. The engine is deterministic — the same version always yields the same score, so a changed score means the package itself changed.

VersionScoreFindingsEngineScanned
v1.1.0 latest A 93/100 14 1.9.0 2026-07-23

Embed this score

Show this server's live Trust Score in your README, docs or website. The badge is served straight from the registry and updates automatically after every rescan — no API key needed. It links back to this page, so anyone who sees the grade can also read the findings behind it instead of taking a number on faith.

MCP Trust Score: A · 93/100
Markdown (GitHub README)
[![MCP Trust Score](https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/el-gringo/badge.svg)](https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/el-gringo)
HTML
<a href="https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/el-gringo"><img src="https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/el-gringo/badge.svg" alt="MCP Trust Score" height="20"></a>
Prefer shields.io styling? Point it at https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/el-gringo/badge.json via https://img.shields.io/endpoint?url=…

Verify this score yourself

The score above is reproducible: the same package version always yields the same result. Run it locally or over the free API — no account, no LLM, fully deterministic.

npx mcptrustchecker scan el-gringo --online --registry pypi

Use the free API → How scoring works

More in Developer Tools