Ds (ahmad-zurih) MCP Server

ds-mcp-server PyPI v0.3.4

Published by ahmad-zurih — no publish provenance, so origin is unverified, but the source is public: the repository link below is self-declared yet readable, so you can inspect the code before adopting it.

An MCP server exposing data science tools (plotting, stats, data exploration) to any LLM client.

Trust grade
B
89/100
Last scanned get badge →
Trust
B · 89/100
Adoption risk for you: the threat score, then adjusted down for blast radius, publisher verification and how much the scan could see. Deterministic; every point is auditable.
Capability
Critical
Blast radius if it went rogue — what the server’s tools could reach. Independent of trust.
Coverage
Source
How much the scan could actually inspect. Shallow coverage is stated, never hidden.
Share this Trust Score
𝕏 Share LinkedIn Reddit
B Why this grade threat 100 − adoption risk = 89/100

The grade answers one question — how safe is this server for you to adopt — so it is computed in two auditable stages. Nothing below is an opinion or an LLM's guess; every line is a real term the deterministic engine applied, and the same input always yields the same number.

1. Threat score — 100 − 0 = 100. What the published surface and source actually contain:

The deterministic scan raised no scored threat in the surface it inspected — the threat score stayed at 100. Capability observations and advisory notes are recorded but never lower it.

2. Client adoption risk — 100 − 11 = 89. Three small, subtract-only factors that reflect your risk in adopting it — a clean scan proves less on a powerful, unverified or barely-inspectable package, so the grade says so plainly:

PointsAdoption-risk factor
−10 capability blast radius (critical) — client exposure if the model is manipulated
−1 publisher verification (public source) — no provenance, but the source is public and inspectable

Capability observations and info notes are shown under Findings but never scored. Open any row's finding below for the file, line and evidence behind a deduction.

Findings 13

critical Completed toxic-flow trifecta across toolsMTC-FLOW-002

This server (without client built-ins) exposes a complete data-exfiltration chain: fetch_webpage → github_read_file → http_request. Untrusted input is ingested, private data is read, and it can be sent to an external sink via the agent composing the tools (→). Static analysis proves the primitive exists, not that a specific run will occur.

Fix: Remove one leg of the trifecta: isolate untrusted-input tools from secret-reading tools and from egress tools, or require human approval between them.

Location: flow fetch_webpage → github_read_file → http_request

high Tool "run_shell_command" exposes command/code executionMTC-CAP-001

Tool "run_shell_command" appears to run shell commands or evaluate code (keyword "shell" in tool name). Arbitrary execution driven by model input is one of the most dangerous MCP capabilities; combined with any untrusted input it becomes RCE.

Fix: Sandbox execution, allowlist commands/arguments, and never pass model output to a shell unescaped.

Location: tool run_shell_command

high Dynamic code execution in server code (src/ds_mcp_server/_tools/plot_interactive.py)MTC-SRC-001

In the server's implementation (`src/ds_mcp_server/_tools/plot_interactive.py:407`): Evaluating strings as code is the most direct RCE primitive; if any tool input reaches it, the server executes attacker-chosen code. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: rt modules, call open()/eval()/exec(), or access dunder attributes." ) except SandboxTimeout as exc:

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server src/ds_mcp_server/_tools/plot_interactive.py

high Dynamic code execution in server code (src/ds_mcp_server/_tools/plot_static.py)MTC-SRC-001

In the server's implementation (`src/ds_mcp_server/_tools/plot_static.py:226`): Evaluating strings as code is the most direct RCE primitive; if any tool input reaches it, the server executes attacker-chosen code. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: rt modules, call open()/eval()/exec(), or access dunder attributes." ) except SandboxTimeout as exc:

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server src/ds_mcp_server/_tools/plot_static.py

high Dynamic code execution in server code (src/ds_mcp_server/server.py)MTC-SRC-001

In the server's implementation (`src/ds_mcp_server/server.py:44`): Evaluating strings as code is the most direct RCE primitive; if any tool input reaches it, the server executes attacker-chosen code. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: eges — imports, open(), eval(),", "!! subprocess, etc. are all allowed.", "!!", "!! A hostile da

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server src/ds_mcp_server/server.py

high Shell/command execution in server code (src/ds_mcp_server/_tools/plot_interactive.py)MTC-SRC-002

In the server's implementation (`src/ds_mcp_server/_tools/plot_interactive.py:407`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: les, call open()/eval()/exec(), or access dunder attributes." ) except SandboxTimeout as exc:

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server src/ds_mcp_server/_tools/plot_interactive.py

high Shell/command execution in server code (src/ds_mcp_server/_tools/plot_static.py)MTC-SRC-002

In the server's implementation (`src/ds_mcp_server/_tools/plot_static.py:226`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: les, call open()/eval()/exec(), or access dunder attributes." ) except SandboxTimeout as exc:

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server src/ds_mcp_server/_tools/plot_static.py

high Shell/command execution in server code (src/ds_mcp_server/_tools/sandbox.py)MTC-SRC-002

In the server's implementation (`src/ds_mcp_server/_tools/sandbox.py:5`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: oduced by the LLM and `exec()` it in-process. Because the LLM's input can be influenced by any file, webpage, or datas

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server src/ds_mcp_server/_tools/sandbox.py

high Shell/command execution in server code (src/ds_mcp_server/_tools/system_tools.py)MTC-SRC-002

In the server's implementation (`src/ds_mcp_server/_tools/system_tools.py:29`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: r("~") result = subprocess.run( command, shell=True, capture_output=True,

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server src/ds_mcp_server/_tools/system_tools.py

medium Tool "write_file" can modify the filesystemMTC-CAP-002

Tool "write_file" can write, overwrite or delete files (keyword "write_file" in tool name). Verify it is scoped to a safe directory.

Fix: Constrain file operations to an explicit, non-sensitive root; reject path traversal.

Location: tool write_file

low Mutating tool "run_shell_command" declares no destructiveHintMTC-CAP-005

Tool "run_shell_command" can mutate/egress but declares no destructiveHint. Clients that don't default to spec-safe behavior may not prompt before running it.

Fix: Declare accurate annotations, and gate destructive tools on user confirmation regardless.

Location: tool run_shell_command

low Mutating tool "write_file" declares no destructiveHintMTC-CAP-005

Tool "write_file" can mutate/egress but declares no destructiveHint. Clients that don't default to spec-safe behavior may not prompt before running it.

Fix: Declare accurate annotations, and gate destructive tools on user confirmation regardless.

Location: tool write_file

low Shell/command execution in packaging/dev tooling (tests/test_sandbox.py)MTC-SRC-002

In a packaging/dev/install script (shipped, but not the server runtime) (`tests/test_sandbox.py:40`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: ('1+1')", "exec('x=1')", "compile('x','<s>','exec')", "open('/etc/passwd')",

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server tests/test_sandbox.py

Tools 49

Each tool and what it can reach — statically extracted from the published source.

  • fetch_webpageingests untrusted input
  • github_read_filereads sensitive data
  • http_requestnetwork egress
  • read_filereads sensitive data
  • run_background_processnetwork egress
  • run_shell_commandruns code / shell
  • search_webingests untrusted input
  • wikipediaingests untrusted input
  • write_filewrites files
  • youtube_transcriptingests untrusted input
Show 39 more tools ↓
  • arxiv_searchno sensitive capability
  • extract_tables_from_pdfno sensitive capability
  • find_in_filesno sensitive capability
  • generate_custom_plotlyno sensitive capability
  • generate_custom_static_plotno sensitive capability
  • get_all_columns_summaryno sensitive capability
  • get_column_summaryno sensitive capability
  • github_searchno sensitive capability
  • list_background_processesno sensitive capability
  • list_directoryno sensitive capability
  • ocr_imageno sensitive capability
  • patch_fileno sensitive capability
  • plot_interactive_barchartno sensitive capability
  • plot_interactive_boxplotno sensitive capability
  • plot_interactive_correlation_heatmapno sensitive capability
  • plot_interactive_histogramno sensitive capability
  • plot_interactive_lineplotno sensitive capability
  • plot_interactive_scatter_matrixno sensitive capability
  • plot_interactive_scatterplotno sensitive capability
  • plot_static_barchartno sensitive capability
  • plot_static_boxplotno sensitive capability
  • plot_static_correlation_heatmapno sensitive capability
  • plot_static_histogramno sensitive capability
  • plot_static_lineplotno sensitive capability
  • plot_static_pairplotno sensitive capability
  • plot_static_scatterplotno sensitive capability
  • plot_static_wordcloudno sensitive capability
  • profile_datasetno sensitive capability
  • rank_target_correlationsno sensitive capability
  • read_docxno sensitive capability
  • read_excel_sheetsno sensitive capability
  • read_pdfno sensitive capability
  • run_correlationno sensitive capability
  • run_group_comparisonno sensitive capability
  • run_linear_regressionno sensitive capability
  • screenshot_webpageno sensitive capability
  • screenshot_webpagesno sensitive capability
  • stop_background_processno sensitive capability
  • summarize_documentno sensitive capability

Toxic flows 1

Cross-tool combinations that form a data-exfiltration primitive (untrusted input → sensitive source → external sink).

What this scan could not see

Versions 4

Scan history per published version. The engine is deterministic — the same version always yields the same score, so a changed score means the package itself changed.

VersionScoreFindingsEngineScanned
v0.3.4 latest B 89/100 13 1.13.0 2026-09-07
v0.3.3 B 89/100 13 1.13.0 2026-08-25
v0.3.0 B 89/100 13 1.12.1 2026-07-27
v0.2.2 B 89/100 17 1.7.0 2026-07-23

Embed this score

Show this server's live Trust Score in your README, docs or website. The badge is served straight from the registry and updates automatically after every rescan — no API key needed. It links back to this page, so anyone who sees the grade can also read the findings behind it instead of taking a number on faith.

MCP Trust Score: B · 89/100
Markdown (GitHub README)
[![MCP Trust Score](https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/ds-mcp-server-2/badge.svg)](https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/ds-mcp-server-2)
HTML
<a href="https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/ds-mcp-server-2"><img src="https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/ds-mcp-server-2/badge.svg" alt="MCP Trust Score" height="20"></a>
Prefer shields.io styling? Point it at https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/ds-mcp-server-2/badge.json via https://img.shields.io/endpoint?url=…

Verify this score yourself

The score above is reproducible: the same package version always yields the same result. Run it locally or over the free API — no account, no LLM, fully deterministic.

npx mcptrustchecker scan ds-mcp-server --online --registry pypi

Use the free API → How scoring works

Other implementations of Ds 4

Independent packages implementing the same tool, scanned with the same engine. Compare all 5 side by side →

More in Learning & Documentation