@davoxi/mcp-server
npm
v1.7.0
Source verified
Published by mabrokamedia — publish provenance cryptographically ties this package to that repository. That is proof of origin, not an official vendor package.
MCP server for the Davoxi AI voice agent platform — manage businesses, agents, usage, and billing via AI assistants.
The grade answers one question — how safe is this server for you to adopt — so it is computed in two auditable stages. Nothing below is an opinion or an LLM's guess; every line is a real term the deterministic engine applied, and the same input always yields the same number.
1. Threat score — 100 − 6.3 = 94. What the published surface and source actually contain:
| Points | What was found | Category |
|---|---|---|
| −6.3 | Untrusted input concatenated into a command sink MTC-SRC-009 | injection |
2. Client adoption risk — 94 − 10 = 84. Three small, subtract-only factors that reflect your risk in adopting it — a clean scan proves less on a powerful, unverified or barely-inspectable package, so the grade says so plainly:
| Points | Adoption-risk factor |
|---|---|
| −10 | capability blast radius (critical) — client exposure if the model is manipulated |
Capability observations and info notes are shown under Findings but never scored.
Open any row's finding below for the file, line and evidence behind a deduction.
In the server's implementation (`dist/src/auth/browser-login.js:10`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.
Evidence: port { execSync } from "child_process"; const DEFAULT_DASHBOARD_URL = "https://app.davoxi.com"; const LOGIN_TIMEOUT_MS =
Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.
Location: server dist/src/auth/browser-login.js
Untrusted-input tools ([list_invoices]) co-exist with external-action tools ([update_business, create_webhook, update_webhook, delete_webhook]). A prompt injection could cause unwanted external actions, though no direct sensitive-data leak path was found.
Evidence: untrusted [list_invoices] → sinks [update_business, create_webhook, update_webhook, delete_webhook]
Fix: Require confirmation for state-changing/egress actions triggered after processing untrusted content.
Location: flow list_invoices → update_business
In the server's implementation (`dist/src/auth/browser-login.js:21`): A shell/process command assembled from concatenated or interpolated values is command injection when any part is attacker-influenced — the OWASP canonical RCE flow. Verify what reaches the interpolated value. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.
Evidence: arwin": execSync(`open "${url}"`, { stdio: "ignore" }); break; case "win32":
Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.
Location: server dist/src/auth/browser-login.js
Tool "unlink_caller_service" can write, overwrite or delete files (keyword "unlink" in tool name). Verify it is scoped to a safe directory.
Fix: Constrain file operations to an explicit, non-sensitive root; reject path traversal.
Location: tool unlink_caller_service
Tool "unlink_caller_service" can mutate/egress but declares no destructiveHint. Clients that don't default to spec-safe behavior may not prompt before running it.
Fix: Declare accurate annotations, and gate destructive tools on user confirmation regardless.
Location: tool unlink_caller_service
In a packaging/dev/install script (shipped, but not the server runtime) (`dist/src/__tests__/browser-login.test.js:4`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.
Evidence: ser-login.js"; vi.mock("child_process", () => ({ execSync: vi.fn() })); // ---------------------------------------------
Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.
Location: server dist/src/__tests__/browser-login.test.js
Each tool and what it can reach — statically extracted from the published source.
create_webhooknetwork egressdelete_webhooknetwork egresslist_invoicesingests untrusted inputunlink_caller_servicewrites filesupdate_businessnetwork egressupdate_webhooknetwork egressadd_caller_to_allowlistno sensitive capabilityadd_caller_to_blocklistno sensitive capabilityattach_tool_to_agentno sensitive capabilitycreate_agentno sensitive capabilitycreate_api_keyno sensitive capabilitycreate_businessno sensitive capabilitycreate_toolno sensitive capabilitydelete_agentno sensitive capabilitydelete_businessno sensitive capabilitydelete_toolno sensitive capabilitydetach_tool_from_agentno sensitive capabilityduplicate_agentno sensitive capabilityget_agentno sensitive capabilityget_businessno sensitive capabilityget_call_logno sensitive capabilityget_callerno sensitive capabilityget_caller_access_auditno sensitive capabilityget_orgno sensitive capabilityget_profileno sensitive capabilityget_subscriptionno sensitive capabilityget_toolno sensitive capabilityget_usageno sensitive capabilityget_usage_summaryno sensitive capabilitylist_agent_tool_refsno sensitive capabilitylist_agentsno sensitive capabilitylist_api_keysno sensitive capabilitylist_blocked_callersno sensitive capabilitylist_businessesno sensitive capabilitylist_call_logsno sensitive capabilitylist_caller_servicesno sensitive capabilitylist_callersno sensitive capabilitylist_phone_numbersno sensitive capabilitylist_tool_credentialsno sensitive capabilitylist_toolsno sensitive capabilitylist_webhooksno sensitive capabilitypause_businessno sensitive capabilityresume_businessno sensitive capabilityrevoke_api_keyno sensitive capabilityset_access_policyno sensitive capabilityset_business_hoursno sensitive capabilityset_caller_force_modeno sensitive capabilityset_caller_rate_limitno sensitive capabilityset_tool_credentialno sensitive capabilitytest_agent_chatno sensitive capabilityupdate_agentno sensitive capabilityupdate_orgno sensitive capabilityupdate_toolno sensitive capabilityCross-tool combinations that form a data-exfiltration primitive (untrusted input → sensitive source → external sink).
Scan history per published version. The engine is deterministic — the same version always yields the same score, so a changed score means the package itself changed.
| Version | Score | Findings | Engine | Scanned |
|---|---|---|---|---|
v1.7.0 latest |
B 84/100 | 6 | 1.13.0 | 2026-09-07 |
Show this server's live Trust Score in your README, docs or website. The badge is served straight from the registry and updates automatically after every rescan — no API key needed. It links back to this page, so anyone who sees the grade can also read the findings behind it instead of taking a number on faith.
The score above is reproducible: the same package version always yields the same result. Run it locally or over the free API — no account, no LLM, fully deterministic.
npx mcptrustchecker scan @davoxi/mcp-server --online
Authenticated MCP transport with HTTP Signatures for AAuth agents
Local-first MCP server for parallel AI coding agents to claim file ownership before edits, preventing stomping on each other in the same worktree.
Agent-agnostic intercommunication system — sessions, messaging, channels, shared state, and real-time events
MCP server for AI agent task communication and delegation with diagnostic lifecycle visibility
Programmatic add/link/unlink for MCP servers across 23 AI coding agents (Claude Code, Claude Desktop, Cursor, VS Code, Codex, Gemini CLI, Zed, Cline, OpenCode, Goose, Kiro, Windsurf, and more). Functional API with dry-run support.
MCP server layer exposing agent-mesh orchestrator as an MCP agent