Claude Talk To Figma (dankinsoid) MCP Server

@dankinsoid/claude-talk-to-figma-mcp npm v0.3.20

Published by @dankinsoid — no publish provenance and no public repository, so the publisher could not be verified and the source cannot be independently located.

Claude Talk to Figma MCP

Trust grade
A
98/100
Last scanned get badge →
Trust
A · 98/100
Adoption risk for you: the threat score, then adjusted down for blast radius, publisher verification and how much the scan could see. Deterministic; every point is auditable.
Capability
Minimal
Blast radius if it went rogue — what the server’s tools could reach. Independent of trust.
Coverage
Source
How much the scan could actually inspect. Shallow coverage is stated, never hidden.
Share this Trust Score
𝕏 Share LinkedIn Reddit
A Why this grade threat 100 − adoption risk = 98/100

The grade answers one question — how safe is this server for you to adopt — so it is computed in two auditable stages. Nothing below is an opinion or an LLM's guess; every line is a real term the deterministic engine applied, and the same input always yields the same number.

1. Threat score — 100 − 0 = 100. What the published surface and source actually contain:

The deterministic scan raised no scored threat in the surface it inspected — the threat score stayed at 100. Capability observations and advisory notes are recorded but never lower it.

2. Client adoption risk — 100 − 2 = 98. Three small, subtract-only factors that reflect your risk in adopting it — a clean scan proves less on a powerful, unverified or barely-inspectable package, so the grade says so plainly:

PointsAdoption-risk factor
−2 publisher verification (unlinked) — no provenance/repo link, but the shipped source was fully read

Capability observations and info notes are shown under Findings but never scored. Open any row's finding below for the file, line and evidence behind a deduction.

Findings 0

✓ No findings. The scan raised nothing on this surface — see Coverage for how deep it could look.

Tools 39

Each tool and what it can reach — statically extracted from the published source.

  • bind_variablesno sensitive capability
  • boolean_operationno sensitive capability
  • clone_nodeno sensitive capability
  • combine_as_variantsno sensitive capability
  • convert_nodesno sensitive capability
  • create_connectionsno sensitive capability
  • delete_nodesno sensitive capability
  • edit_groupsno sensitive capability
  • edit_nodesno sensitive capability
  • edit_stylesno sensitive capability
Show 29 more tools ↓
  • edit_tableno sensitive capability
  • export_node_as_imageno sensitive capability
  • get_active_channelno sensitive capability
  • get_annotationsno sensitive capability
  • get_instance_overridesno sensitive capability
  • get_local_componentsno sensitive capability
  • get_reactionsno sensitive capability
  • get_selectionno sensitive capability
  • get_stylesno sensitive capability
  • get_variablesno sensitive capability
  • get_write_schemano sensitive capability
  • glob_nodesno sensitive capability
  • grep_nodesno sensitive capability
  • join_channelno sensitive capability
  • list_fontsno sensitive capability
  • query_nodesno sensitive capability
  • read_nodeno sensitive capability
  • reparent_nodesno sensitive capability
  • set_annotationsno sensitive capability
  • set_default_connectorno sensitive capability
  • set_focusno sensitive capability
  • set_instance_overridesno sensitive capability
  • set_reactionsno sensitive capability
  • set_selectionsno sensitive capability
  • set_variablesno sensitive capability
  • style_text_rangeno sensitive capability
  • write_nodesno sensitive capability
  • write_stylesno sensitive capability
  • write_tableno sensitive capability

What this scan could not see

Versions 1

Scan history per published version. The engine is deterministic — the same version always yields the same score, so a changed score means the package itself changed.

VersionScoreFindingsEngineScanned
v0.3.20 latest A 98/100 0 1.13.0 2026-09-08

Embed this score

Show this server's live Trust Score in your README, docs or website. The badge is served straight from the registry and updates automatically after every rescan — no API key needed. It links back to this page, so anyone who sees the grade can also read the findings behind it instead of taking a number on faith.

MCP Trust Score: A · 98/100
Markdown (GitHub README)
[![MCP Trust Score](https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/dankinsoid-claude-talk-to-figma-mcp/badge.svg)](https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/dankinsoid-claude-talk-to-figma-mcp)
HTML
<a href="https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/dankinsoid-claude-talk-to-figma-mcp"><img src="https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/dankinsoid-claude-talk-to-figma-mcp/badge.svg" alt="MCP Trust Score" height="20"></a>
Prefer shields.io styling? Point it at https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/dankinsoid-claude-talk-to-figma-mcp/badge.json via https://img.shields.io/endpoint?url=…

Verify this score yourself

The score above is reproducible: the same package version always yields the same result. Run it locally or over the free API — no account, no LLM, fully deterministic.

npx mcptrustchecker scan @dankinsoid/claude-talk-to-figma-mcp --online

Use the free API → How scoring works

Other implementations of Claude Talk To Figma 1

Independent packages implementing the same tool, scanned with the same engine. Compare all 2 side by side →

More in Design & Media