Celavii M365 MCP Server

celavii-m365 npm v0.5.0 Source verified

Published by celaviihq — publish provenance cryptographically ties this package to that repository. That is proof of origin, not an official vendor package.

Trust grade
A
94/100
Last scanned get badge →
Trust
A · 94/100
Adoption risk for you: the threat score, then adjusted down for blast radius, publisher verification and how much the scan could see. Deterministic; every point is auditable.
Capability
High
Blast radius if it went rogue — what the server’s tools could reach. Independent of trust.
Coverage
Source
How much the scan could actually inspect. Shallow coverage is stated, never hidden.
Share this Trust Score
𝕏 Share LinkedIn Reddit
A Why this grade threat 100 − adoption risk = 94/100

The grade answers one question — how safe is this server for you to adopt — so it is computed in two auditable stages. Nothing below is an opinion or an LLM's guess; every line is a real term the deterministic engine applied, and the same input always yields the same number.

1. Threat score — 100 − 0 = 100. What the published surface and source actually contain:

The deterministic scan raised no scored threat in the surface it inspected — the threat score stayed at 100. Capability observations and advisory notes are recorded but never lower it.

2. Client adoption risk — 100 − 6 = 94. Three small, subtract-only factors that reflect your risk in adopting it — a clean scan proves less on a powerful, unverified or barely-inspectable package, so the grade says so plainly:

PointsAdoption-risk factor
−6 capability blast radius (high) — client exposure if the model is manipulated

Capability observations and info notes are shown under Findings but never scored. Open any row's finding below for the file, line and evidence behind a deduction.

Findings 4

critical Completed toxic-flow trifecta across toolsMTC-FLOW-002

This server (without client built-ins) exposes a complete data-exfiltration chain: m365_onedrive_download → m365_onedrive_list → m365_draft_email. Untrusted input is ingested, private data is read, and it can be sent to an external sink via the agent composing the tools (→). Static analysis proves the primitive exists, not that a specific run will occur.

Fix: Remove one leg of the trifecta: isolate untrusted-input tools from secret-reading tools and from egress tools, or require human approval between them.

Location: flow m365_onedrive_download → m365_onedrive_list → m365_draft_email

medium Hardcoded egress to an external endpoint (dist/auth-server.js)MTC-SRC-003

In the server's implementation (`dist/auth-server.js:88`): A hardcoded outbound call to a fixed external host inside server code is a classic exfiltration/telemetry channel — especially paired with reads of local data. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: ; const res = await fetch( `https://login.microsoftonline.com/${this.config.tenantId}/oauth2/v2.0/token`,

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server dist/auth-server.js

medium Hardcoded egress to an external endpoint (dist/index.js)MTC-SRC-003

In the server's implementation (`dist/index.js:298`): A hardcoded outbound call to a fixed external host inside server code is a classic exfiltration/telemetry channel — especially paired with reads of local data. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: ; const res = await fetch( `https://login.microsoftonline.com/${this.config.tenantId}/oauth2/v2.0/token`,

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server dist/index.js

medium Hardcoded egress to an external endpoint (dist/remote/index.js)MTC-SRC-003

In the server's implementation (`dist/remote/index.js:296`): A hardcoded outbound call to a fixed external host inside server code is a classic exfiltration/telemetry channel — especially paired with reads of local data. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: ; const res = await fetch( `https://login.microsoftonline.com/${this.config.tenantId}/oauth2/v2.0/token`,

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server dist/remote/index.js

Tools 36

Each tool and what it can reach — statically extracted from the published source.

  • m365_draft_emailnetwork egress
  • m365_onedrive_downloadingests untrusted input
  • m365_onedrive_listreads sensitive data
  • m365_read_emailingests untrusted input
  • m365_send_emailnetwork egress
  • m365_aboutno sensitive capability
  • m365_accept_eventno sensitive capability
  • m365_authenticateno sensitive capability
  • m365_cancel_eventno sensitive capability
  • m365_check_auth_statusno sensitive capability
Show 26 more tools ↓
  • m365_create_eventno sensitive capability
  • m365_create_folderno sensitive capability
  • m365_create_ruleno sensitive capability
  • m365_decline_eventno sensitive capability
  • m365_delete_eventno sensitive capability
  • m365_delete_ruleno sensitive capability
  • m365_flow_listno sensitive capability
  • m365_flow_list_environmentsno sensitive capability
  • m365_flow_list_runsno sensitive capability
  • m365_flow_runno sensitive capability
  • m365_flow_toggleno sensitive capability
  • m365_list_emailsno sensitive capability
  • m365_list_eventsno sensitive capability
  • m365_list_foldersno sensitive capability
  • m365_list_rulesno sensitive capability
  • m365_logoutno sensitive capability
  • m365_mark_as_readno sensitive capability
  • m365_move_emailsno sensitive capability
  • m365_onedrive_create_folderno sensitive capability
  • m365_onedrive_deleteno sensitive capability
  • m365_onedrive_searchno sensitive capability
  • m365_onedrive_shareno sensitive capability
  • m365_onedrive_uploadno sensitive capability
  • m365_search_emailsno sensitive capability
  • m365_send_draftno sensitive capability
  • m365_update_rule_sequenceno sensitive capability

Toxic flows 1

Cross-tool combinations that form a data-exfiltration primitive (untrusted input → sensitive source → external sink).

What this scan could not see

Versions 1

Scan history per published version. The engine is deterministic — the same version always yields the same score, so a changed score means the package itself changed.

VersionScoreFindingsEngineScanned
v0.5.0 latest A 94/100 4 1.9.0 2026-07-24

Embed this score

Show this server's live Trust Score in your README, docs or website. The badge is served straight from the registry and updates automatically after every rescan — no API key needed. It links back to this page, so anyone who sees the grade can also read the findings behind it instead of taking a number on faith.

MCP Trust Score: A · 94/100
Markdown (GitHub README)
[![MCP Trust Score](https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/celavii-m365/badge.svg)](https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/celavii-m365)
HTML
<a href="https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/celavii-m365"><img src="https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/celavii-m365/badge.svg" alt="MCP Trust Score" height="20"></a>
Prefer shields.io styling? Point it at https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/celavii-m365/badge.json via https://img.shields.io/endpoint?url=…

Verify this score yourself

The score above is reproducible: the same package version always yields the same result. Run it locally or over the free API — no account, no LLM, fully deterministic.

npx mcptrustchecker scan celavii-m365 --online

Use the free API → How scoring works

More in Developer Tools