@brief-md/mcp
npm
v0.1.1
Published by @brief-md — no publish provenance, so origin is unverified, but the source is public: the repository link below is self-declared yet readable, so you can inspect the code before adopting it.
MCP server for BRIEF.md project context management
The grade answers one question — how safe is this server for you to adopt — so it is computed in two auditable stages. Nothing below is an opinion or an LLM's guess; every line is a real term the deterministic engine applied, and the same input always yields the same number.
1. Threat score — 100 − 0 = 100. What the published surface and source actually contain:
The deterministic scan raised no scored threat in the surface it inspected — the threat score stayed at 100. Capability observations and advisory notes are recorded but never lower it.
2. Client adoption risk — 100 − 4 = 96. Three small, subtract-only factors that reflect your risk in adopting it — a clean scan proves less on a powerful, unverified or barely-inspectable package, so the grade says so plainly:
| Points | Adoption-risk factor |
|---|---|
| −3 | capability blast radius (moderate) — client exposure if the model is manipulated |
| −1 | publisher verification (public source) — no provenance, but the source is public and inspectable |
Capability observations and info notes are shown under Findings but never scored.
Open any row's finding below for the file, line and evidence behind a deduction.
Each tool and what it can reach — statically extracted from the published source.
brief_browse_ontologyingests untrusted inputbrief_discover_referencesingests untrusted inputbrief_fetch_datasetingests untrusted inputbrief_get_constraintsingests untrusted inputbrief_add_constraintno sensitive capabilitybrief_add_decisionno sensitive capabilitybrief_add_extensionno sensitive capabilitybrief_add_questionno sensitive capabilitybrief_add_referenceno sensitive capabilitybrief_add_workspaceno sensitive capabilitybrief_apply_type_guideno sensitive capabilitybrief_capture_external_sessionno sensitive capabilitybrief_check_conflictsno sensitive capabilitybrief_convert_to_structuredno sensitive capabilitybrief_create_ontologyno sensitive capabilitybrief_create_parent_projectno sensitive capabilitybrief_create_projectno sensitive capabilitybrief_create_sub_projectno sensitive capabilitybrief_create_type_guideno sensitive capabilitybrief_design_extensionno sensitive capabilitybrief_discover_ontologiesno sensitive capabilitybrief_get_contextno sensitive capabilitybrief_get_decisionsno sensitive capabilitybrief_get_entry_referencesno sensitive capabilitybrief_get_maturity_signalsno sensitive capabilitybrief_get_ontology_entryno sensitive capabilitybrief_get_project_frameworksno sensitive capabilitybrief_get_questionsno sensitive capabilitybrief_get_type_guideno sensitive capabilitybrief_hierarchy_treeno sensitive capabilitybrief_install_ontologyno sensitive capabilitybrief_link_section_datasetno sensitive capabilitybrief_lintno sensitive capabilitybrief_list_extensionsno sensitive capabilitybrief_list_ontologiesno sensitive capabilitybrief_list_ontology_columnsno sensitive capabilitybrief_list_projectsno sensitive capabilitybrief_list_tagsno sensitive capabilitybrief_lookup_referenceno sensitive capabilitybrief_ontology_draftno sensitive capabilitybrief_preview_datasetno sensitive capabilitybrief_reenter_projectno sensitive capabilitybrief_remove_extensionno sensitive capabilitybrief_remove_ontologyno sensitive capabilitybrief_remove_tagno sensitive capabilitybrief_resolve_questionno sensitive capabilitybrief_search_ontologyno sensitive capabilitybrief_search_registryno sensitive capabilitybrief_set_active_projectno sensitive capabilitybrief_set_tutorial_dismissedno sensitive capabilitybrief_start_tutorialno sensitive capabilitybrief_suggest_extensionsno sensitive capabilitybrief_suggest_referencesno sensitive capabilitybrief_suggest_type_guidesno sensitive capabilitybrief_tag_entryno sensitive capabilitybrief_update_sectionno sensitive capabilitybrief_where_am_ino sensitive capabilitybrief-mcpno sensitive capabilityDraft Summaryno sensitive capabilityexternal-community-toolno sensitive capabilityexternal-untrusted-packno sensitive capabilityregistry-tool-ano sensitive capabilitytest-toolno sensitive capabilitytest-type-guideno sensitive capabilityScan history per published version. The engine is deterministic — the same version always yields the same score, so a changed score means the package itself changed.
| Version | Score | Findings | Engine | Scanned |
|---|---|---|---|---|
v0.1.1 latest |
A 96/100 | 0 | 1.13.0 | 2026-09-08 |
Show this server's live Trust Score in your README, docs or website. The badge is served straight from the registry and updates automatically after every rescan — no API key needed. It links back to this page, so anyone who sees the grade can also read the findings behind it instead of taking a number on faith.
The score above is reproducible: the same package version always yields the same result. Run it locally or over the free API — no account, no LLM, fully deterministic.
npx mcptrustchecker scan @brief-md/mcp --online
FDA device & vehicle recall risk for AI agents: recall history, MAUDE trend, risk score.
Open-source MCP server exposing Agent402.Tools' catalog — 500+ strong: 400+ self-hostable tools + 100 multi-tool skill packs (security-audit, trend-analysis, structured-scrape, decode-blob, forecasting-bake-off) for AI agents — browser, web search & answe
Zero-dependency MCP server that gives AI agents a self-updating project memory in AGENTS.md. Returns merge instructions instead of mutating state, so every change is a reviewable diff.
MCP Apps UI resources and server helpers for n8n
MCP server providing comprehensive access to BookStack knowledge management system
MCP server for tracking achievements with STAR methodology