bridge-mcp
PyPI
v2.1.0
Published by barhamagha1 — no publish provenance, so origin is unverified, but the source is public: the repository link below is self-declared yet readable, so you can inspect the code before adopting it.
Visual Desktop Bridge - Give any AI full control over Windows
The grade answers one question — how safe is this server for you to adopt — so it is computed in two auditable stages. Nothing below is an opinion or an LLM's guess; every line is a real term the deterministic engine applied, and the same input always yields the same number.
1. Threat score — 100 − 0 = 100. What the published surface and source actually contain:
The deterministic scan raised no scored threat in the surface it inspected — the threat score stayed at 100. Capability observations and advisory notes are recorded but never lower it.
2. Client adoption risk — 100 − 11 = 89. Three small, subtract-only factors that reflect your risk in adopting it — a clean scan proves less on a powerful, unverified or barely-inspectable package, so the grade says so plainly:
| Points | Adoption-risk factor |
|---|---|
| −10 | capability blast radius (critical) — client exposure if the model is manipulated |
| −1 | publisher verification (public source) — no provenance, but the source is public and inspectable |
Capability observations and info notes are shown under Findings but never scored.
Open any row's finding below for the file, line and evidence behind a deduction.
This server (without client built-ins) exposes a complete data-exfiltration chain: fetch → file_list → run_powershell. Untrusted input is ingested, private data is read, and it can be sent to an external sink via the agent composing the tools (→). Static analysis proves the primitive exists, not that a specific run will occur.
Fix: Remove one leg of the trifecta: isolate untrusted-input tools from secret-reading tools and from egress tools, or require human approval between them.
Location: flow fetch → file_list → run_powershell
Tool "run_powershell" appears to run shell commands or evaluate code (keyword "powershell" in tool name). Arbitrary execution driven by model input is one of the most dangerous MCP capabilities; combined with any untrusted input it becomes RCE.
Fix: Sandbox execution, allowlist commands/arguments, and never pass model output to a shell unescaped.
Location: tool run_powershell
In the server's implementation (`local_agent.py:267`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.
Evidence: mmand.""" result = subprocess.run( ["powershell", "-Command", command], capture_output=True, text
Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.
Location: server local_agent.py
In the server's implementation (`local_agent_tools/app_tools.py:51`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.
Evidence: lower(), name) subprocess.Popen(cmd, shell=True) return f"Launched {name}" except Exception as e:
Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.
Location: server local_agent_tools/app_tools.py
In the server's implementation (`local_agent_tools/system_tools.py:10`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.
Evidence: ecute result = subprocess.run( ["powershell", "-Command", command], capture_output=T
Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.
Location: server local_agent_tools/system_tools.py
In the server's implementation (`utils/updater.py:9`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.
Evidence: try: result = subprocess.run( ["git"] + args, capture_output=True, text
Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.
Location: server utils/updater.py
Tool "write_file" can write, overwrite or delete files (keyword "write_file" in tool name). Verify it is scoped to a safe directory.
Fix: Constrain file operations to an explicit, non-sensitive root; reject path traversal.
Location: tool write_file
Tool "edit_file" can write, overwrite or delete files (keyword "edit_file" in tool name). Verify it is scoped to a safe directory.
Fix: Constrain file operations to an explicit, non-sensitive root; reject path traversal.
Location: tool edit_file
Tool "move_file" can write, overwrite or delete files (keyword "move_file" in tool name). Verify it is scoped to a safe directory.
Fix: Constrain file operations to an explicit, non-sensitive root; reject path traversal.
Location: tool move_file
Tool "run_powershell" can mutate/egress but declares no destructiveHint. Clients that don't default to spec-safe behavior may not prompt before running it.
Fix: Declare accurate annotations, and gate destructive tools on user confirmation regardless.
Location: tool run_powershell
Tool "write_file" can mutate/egress but declares no destructiveHint. Clients that don't default to spec-safe behavior may not prompt before running it.
Fix: Declare accurate annotations, and gate destructive tools on user confirmation regardless.
Location: tool write_file
Tool "edit_file" can mutate/egress but declares no destructiveHint. Clients that don't default to spec-safe behavior may not prompt before running it.
Fix: Declare accurate annotations, and gate destructive tools on user confirmation regardless.
Location: tool edit_file
Tool "move_file" can mutate/egress but declares no destructiveHint. Clients that don't default to spec-safe behavior may not prompt before running it.
Fix: Declare accurate annotations, and gate destructive tools on user confirmation regardless.
Location: tool move_file
Tool "write_file" takes a path parameter "path" with no constraint. Without a canonicalize-and-contain check (not visible statically), this permits ../ traversal outside the intended root.
Fix: Resolve and verify the path stays within an allowed root; reject traversal sequences.
Location: tool write_file · inputSchema.properties.path
Tool "edit_file" takes a path parameter "path" with no constraint. Without a canonicalize-and-contain check (not visible statically), this permits ../ traversal outside the intended root.
Fix: Resolve and verify the path stays within an allowed root; reject traversal sequences.
Location: tool edit_file · inputSchema.properties.path
In a packaging/dev/install script (shipped, but not the server runtime) (`scripts/auto_auth.py:9`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.
Evidence: t(f"Opening {url}...") os.system(f'start chrome "{url}"') print("Waiting for page load...") time.sleep(5) print
Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.
Location: server scripts/auto_auth.py
In a packaging/dev/install script (shipped, but not the server runtime) (`scripts/open_github.py:10`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.
Evidence: (User's daily chrome) os.system(f'start chrome "{url}"') # Wait for load time.sleep(3) # Take initial screensho
Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.
Location: server scripts/open_github.py
In a packaging/dev/install script (shipped, but not the server runtime) (`servers/scripts/release.py:42`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.
Evidence: ts in repo subprocess.run( ["git", "rev-parse", "--verify", value], check=True, capture_ou
Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.
Location: server servers/scripts/release.py
In a packaging/dev/install script (shipped, but not the server runtime) (`servers/src/filesystem/__tests__/structured-content.test.ts:7`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.
Evidence: import { spawn } from 'child_process'; /** * Integration tests to verify that tool handlers return structuredConte
Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.
Location: server servers/src/filesystem/__tests__/structured-content.test.ts
Each tool and what it can reach — statically extracted from the published source.
edit_filewrites filesfetchingests untrusted inputfile_listreads sensitive dataget-envreads sensitive datamove_filewrites filesread_filereads sensitive datarun_powershellruns code / shellwrite_filewrites filesadd_observationsno sensitive capabilityapp_closeno sensitive capabilityapp_launchno sensitive capabilityapp_listno sensitive capabilityapp_switchno sensitive capabilitybrowser_clickno sensitive capabilitybrowser_contentno sensitive capabilitybrowser_navigateno sensitive capabilitybrowser_pressno sensitive capabilitybrowser_screenshotno sensitive capabilitybrowser_typeno sensitive capabilitycheck_agent_healthno sensitive capabilitychrome_navigateno sensitive capabilitychrome_openno sensitive capabilityclickno sensitive capabilityclick_gridno sensitive capabilityclipboard_copyno sensitive capabilityclipboard_pasteno sensitive capabilitycreate_directoryno sensitive capabilitycreate_entitiesno sensitive capabilitycreate_relationsno sensitive capabilitydelete_entitiesno sensitive capabilitydelete_observationsno sensitive capabilitydelete_relationsno sensitive capabilitydirectory_treeno sensitive capabilitydouble_clickno sensitive capabilitydragno sensitive capabilityechono sensitive capabilityfile_readno sensitive capabilityfile_writeno sensitive capabilityget_desktop_stateno sensitive capabilityget_file_infono sensitive capabilityget_infono sensitive capabilityget_mouse_positionno sensitive capabilityget_screen_sizeno sensitive capabilityget_setup_instructionsno sensitive capabilityget_visual_stateno sensitive capabilityget-annotated-messageno sensitive capabilityget-resource-linksno sensitive capabilityget-resource-referenceno sensitive capabilityget-roots-listno sensitive capabilityget-structured-contentno sensitive capabilityget-sumno sensitive capabilityget-tiny-imageno sensitive capabilitygzip-file-as-resourceno sensitive capabilityhotkeyno sensitive capabilitylist_agentsno sensitive capabilitylist_allowed_directoriesno sensitive capabilitylist_directoryno sensitive capabilitylist_directory_with_sizesno sensitive capabilitymove_mouseno sensitive capabilityopen_nodesno sensitive capabilitypress_keyno sensitive capabilityread_graphno sensitive capabilityread_media_fileno sensitive capabilityread_multiple_filesno sensitive capabilityread_text_fileno sensitive capabilityregister_agentno sensitive capabilityright_clickno sensitive capabilityrun_cmdno sensitive capabilityscreenshotno sensitive capabilityscrollno sensitive capabilitysearch_filesno sensitive capabilitysearch_nodesno sensitive capabilitysequentialthinkingno sensitive capabilityset_default_agentno sensitive capabilitytoggle-simulated-loggingno sensitive capabilitytoggle-subscriber-updatesno sensitive capabilitytrigger-elicitation-requestno sensitive capabilitytrigger-long-running-operationno sensitive capabilitytrigger-sampling-requestno sensitive capabilitytype_textno sensitive capabilityunregister_agentno sensitive capabilitywaitno sensitive capabilityCross-tool combinations that form a data-exfiltration primitive (untrusted input → sensitive source → external sink).
Scan history per published version. The engine is deterministic — the same version always yields the same score, so a changed score means the package itself changed.
| Version | Score | Findings | Engine | Scanned |
|---|---|---|---|---|
v2.1.0 latest |
B 89/100 | 19 | 1.13.0 | 2026-08-25 |
Show this server's live Trust Score in your README, docs or website. The badge is served straight from the registry and updates automatically after every rescan — no API key needed. It links back to this page, so anyone who sees the grade can also read the findings behind it instead of taking a number on faith.
The score above is reproducible: the same package version always yields the same result. Run it locally or over the free API — no account, no LLM, fully deterministic.
npx mcptrustchecker scan bridge-mcp --online --registry pypi
Independent packages implementing the same tool, scanned with the same engine. Compare all 11 side by side →
Model Context Protocol (MCP) server to use Universal Tool Calling Protocol (UTCP)
Stdio-to-HTTP bridge for MCP (Model Context Protocol). Connects any stdio MCP client to inference.sh or any remote MCP server via Streamable HTTP transport with Bearer token auth.
Cross-platform intelligence bridge — correlate Ignition SCADA tags with Studio 5000 PLC logic
Bridge utilities for Model Context Protocol
A middleware to provide an openAI compatible endpoint that can call MCP tools.
Stdio MCP bridge that connects Claude Code, Claude Desktop, OpenClaw, and Gemini CLI to a helmdeck control plane.
Hotel booking MCP server — 300K+ properties, real confirmation numbers, loyalty programs. Builders monetize every booking via Stripe Connect. The first MCP server that completes real hotel reservations inside AI conversations.
Manage AdGuard Home through AI assistants
Read-only Azure DevOps for MCP clients using only your existing browser session — no PAT, no Azure CLI. Browse work items, pull requests, comments, attachments and Artifacts feeds across every project, repo and feed you can access.
MCP server for Adobe Experience Manager Assets integration development
Servidor MCP para el tiempo oficial de España (API pública OpenData de AEMET). Predicción, observación y avisos como herramientas MCP tipadas.
A standalone MCP stdio bridge for Affinity by Canva's local MCP SSE server.