Bridge (BarhamAgha1) MCP Server

bridge-mcp PyPI v2.1.0

Published by barhamagha1 — no publish provenance, so origin is unverified, but the source is public: the repository link below is self-declared yet readable, so you can inspect the code before adopting it.

Visual Desktop Bridge - Give any AI full control over Windows

Trust grade
B
89/100
Last scanned get badge →
Trust
B · 89/100
Adoption risk for you: the threat score, then adjusted down for blast radius, publisher verification and how much the scan could see. Deterministic; every point is auditable.
Capability
Critical
Blast radius if it went rogue — what the server’s tools could reach. Independent of trust.
Coverage
Source
How much the scan could actually inspect. Shallow coverage is stated, never hidden.
Share this Trust Score
𝕏 Share LinkedIn Reddit
B Why this grade threat 100 − adoption risk = 89/100

The grade answers one question — how safe is this server for you to adopt — so it is computed in two auditable stages. Nothing below is an opinion or an LLM's guess; every line is a real term the deterministic engine applied, and the same input always yields the same number.

1. Threat score — 100 − 0 = 100. What the published surface and source actually contain:

The deterministic scan raised no scored threat in the surface it inspected — the threat score stayed at 100. Capability observations and advisory notes are recorded but never lower it.

2. Client adoption risk — 100 − 11 = 89. Three small, subtract-only factors that reflect your risk in adopting it — a clean scan proves less on a powerful, unverified or barely-inspectable package, so the grade says so plainly:

PointsAdoption-risk factor
−10 capability blast radius (critical) — client exposure if the model is manipulated
−1 publisher verification (public source) — no provenance, but the source is public and inspectable

Capability observations and info notes are shown under Findings but never scored. Open any row's finding below for the file, line and evidence behind a deduction.

Findings 19

critical Completed toxic-flow trifecta across toolsMTC-FLOW-002

This server (without client built-ins) exposes a complete data-exfiltration chain: fetch → file_list → run_powershell. Untrusted input is ingested, private data is read, and it can be sent to an external sink via the agent composing the tools (→). Static analysis proves the primitive exists, not that a specific run will occur.

Fix: Remove one leg of the trifecta: isolate untrusted-input tools from secret-reading tools and from egress tools, or require human approval between them.

Location: flow fetch → file_list → run_powershell

high Tool "run_powershell" exposes command/code executionMTC-CAP-001

Tool "run_powershell" appears to run shell commands or evaluate code (keyword "powershell" in tool name). Arbitrary execution driven by model input is one of the most dangerous MCP capabilities; combined with any untrusted input it becomes RCE.

Fix: Sandbox execution, allowlist commands/arguments, and never pass model output to a shell unescaped.

Location: tool run_powershell

high Shell/command execution in server code (local_agent.py)MTC-SRC-002

In the server's implementation (`local_agent.py:267`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: mmand.""" result = subprocess.run( ["powershell", "-Command", command], capture_output=True, text

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server local_agent.py

high Shell/command execution in server code (local_agent_tools/app_tools.py)MTC-SRC-002

In the server's implementation (`local_agent_tools/app_tools.py:51`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: lower(), name) subprocess.Popen(cmd, shell=True) return f"Launched {name}" except Exception as e:

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server local_agent_tools/app_tools.py

high Shell/command execution in server code (local_agent_tools/system_tools.py)MTC-SRC-002

In the server's implementation (`local_agent_tools/system_tools.py:10`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: ecute result = subprocess.run( ["powershell", "-Command", command], capture_output=T

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server local_agent_tools/system_tools.py

high Shell/command execution in server code (utils/updater.py)MTC-SRC-002

In the server's implementation (`utils/updater.py:9`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: try: result = subprocess.run( ["git"] + args, capture_output=True, text

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server utils/updater.py

medium Tool "write_file" can modify the filesystemMTC-CAP-002

Tool "write_file" can write, overwrite or delete files (keyword "write_file" in tool name). Verify it is scoped to a safe directory.

Fix: Constrain file operations to an explicit, non-sensitive root; reject path traversal.

Location: tool write_file

medium Tool "edit_file" can modify the filesystemMTC-CAP-002

Tool "edit_file" can write, overwrite or delete files (keyword "edit_file" in tool name). Verify it is scoped to a safe directory.

Fix: Constrain file operations to an explicit, non-sensitive root; reject path traversal.

Location: tool edit_file

medium Tool "move_file" can modify the filesystemMTC-CAP-002

Tool "move_file" can write, overwrite or delete files (keyword "move_file" in tool name). Verify it is scoped to a safe directory.

Fix: Constrain file operations to an explicit, non-sensitive root; reject path traversal.

Location: tool move_file

low Mutating tool "run_powershell" declares no destructiveHintMTC-CAP-005

Tool "run_powershell" can mutate/egress but declares no destructiveHint. Clients that don't default to spec-safe behavior may not prompt before running it.

Fix: Declare accurate annotations, and gate destructive tools on user confirmation regardless.

Location: tool run_powershell

low Mutating tool "write_file" declares no destructiveHintMTC-CAP-005

Tool "write_file" can mutate/egress but declares no destructiveHint. Clients that don't default to spec-safe behavior may not prompt before running it.

Fix: Declare accurate annotations, and gate destructive tools on user confirmation regardless.

Location: tool write_file

low Mutating tool "edit_file" declares no destructiveHintMTC-CAP-005

Tool "edit_file" can mutate/egress but declares no destructiveHint. Clients that don't default to spec-safe behavior may not prompt before running it.

Fix: Declare accurate annotations, and gate destructive tools on user confirmation regardless.

Location: tool edit_file

low Mutating tool "move_file" declares no destructiveHintMTC-CAP-005

Tool "move_file" can mutate/egress but declares no destructiveHint. Clients that don't default to spec-safe behavior may not prompt before running it.

Fix: Declare accurate annotations, and gate destructive tools on user confirmation regardless.

Location: tool move_file

low Unconstrained path parameter "path" on "write_file"MTC-CAP-008

Tool "write_file" takes a path parameter "path" with no constraint. Without a canonicalize-and-contain check (not visible statically), this permits ../ traversal outside the intended root.

Fix: Resolve and verify the path stays within an allowed root; reject traversal sequences.

Location: tool write_file · inputSchema.properties.path

low Unconstrained path parameter "path" on "edit_file"MTC-CAP-008

Tool "edit_file" takes a path parameter "path" with no constraint. Without a canonicalize-and-contain check (not visible statically), this permits ../ traversal outside the intended root.

Fix: Resolve and verify the path stays within an allowed root; reject traversal sequences.

Location: tool edit_file · inputSchema.properties.path

low Shell/command execution in packaging/dev tooling (scripts/auto_auth.py)MTC-SRC-002

In a packaging/dev/install script (shipped, but not the server runtime) (`scripts/auto_auth.py:9`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: t(f"Opening {url}...") os.system(f'start chrome "{url}"') print("Waiting for page load...") time.sleep(5) print

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server scripts/auto_auth.py

low Shell/command execution in packaging/dev tooling (scripts/open_github.py)MTC-SRC-002

In a packaging/dev/install script (shipped, but not the server runtime) (`scripts/open_github.py:10`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: (User's daily chrome) os.system(f'start chrome "{url}"') # Wait for load time.sleep(3) # Take initial screensho

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server scripts/open_github.py

low Shell/command execution in packaging/dev tooling (servers/scripts/release.py)MTC-SRC-002

In a packaging/dev/install script (shipped, but not the server runtime) (`servers/scripts/release.py:42`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: ts in repo subprocess.run( ["git", "rev-parse", "--verify", value], check=True, capture_ou

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server servers/scripts/release.py

low Shell/command execution in packaging/dev tooling (servers/src/filesystem/__tests__/structured-content.test.ts)MTC-SRC-002

In a packaging/dev/install script (shipped, but not the server runtime) (`servers/src/filesystem/__tests__/structured-content.test.ts:7`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: import { spawn } from 'child_process'; /** * Integration tests to verify that tool handlers return structuredConte

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server servers/src/filesystem/__tests__/structured-content.test.ts

Tools 82

Each tool and what it can reach — statically extracted from the published source.

  • edit_filewrites files
  • fetchingests untrusted input
  • file_listreads sensitive data
  • get-envreads sensitive data
  • move_filewrites files
  • read_filereads sensitive data
  • run_powershellruns code / shell
  • write_filewrites files
  • add_observationsno sensitive capability
  • app_closeno sensitive capability
Show 72 more tools ↓
  • app_launchno sensitive capability
  • app_listno sensitive capability
  • app_switchno sensitive capability
  • browser_clickno sensitive capability
  • browser_contentno sensitive capability
  • browser_navigateno sensitive capability
  • browser_pressno sensitive capability
  • browser_screenshotno sensitive capability
  • browser_typeno sensitive capability
  • check_agent_healthno sensitive capability
  • chrome_navigateno sensitive capability
  • chrome_openno sensitive capability
  • clickno sensitive capability
  • click_gridno sensitive capability
  • clipboard_copyno sensitive capability
  • clipboard_pasteno sensitive capability
  • create_directoryno sensitive capability
  • create_entitiesno sensitive capability
  • create_relationsno sensitive capability
  • delete_entitiesno sensitive capability
  • delete_observationsno sensitive capability
  • delete_relationsno sensitive capability
  • directory_treeno sensitive capability
  • double_clickno sensitive capability
  • dragno sensitive capability
  • echono sensitive capability
  • file_readno sensitive capability
  • file_writeno sensitive capability
  • get_desktop_stateno sensitive capability
  • get_file_infono sensitive capability
  • get_infono sensitive capability
  • get_mouse_positionno sensitive capability
  • get_screen_sizeno sensitive capability
  • get_setup_instructionsno sensitive capability
  • get_visual_stateno sensitive capability
  • get-annotated-messageno sensitive capability
  • get-resource-linksno sensitive capability
  • get-resource-referenceno sensitive capability
  • get-roots-listno sensitive capability
  • get-structured-contentno sensitive capability
  • get-sumno sensitive capability
  • get-tiny-imageno sensitive capability
  • gzip-file-as-resourceno sensitive capability
  • hotkeyno sensitive capability
  • list_agentsno sensitive capability
  • list_allowed_directoriesno sensitive capability
  • list_directoryno sensitive capability
  • list_directory_with_sizesno sensitive capability
  • move_mouseno sensitive capability
  • open_nodesno sensitive capability
  • press_keyno sensitive capability
  • read_graphno sensitive capability
  • read_media_fileno sensitive capability
  • read_multiple_filesno sensitive capability
  • read_text_fileno sensitive capability
  • register_agentno sensitive capability
  • right_clickno sensitive capability
  • run_cmdno sensitive capability
  • screenshotno sensitive capability
  • scrollno sensitive capability
  • search_filesno sensitive capability
  • search_nodesno sensitive capability
  • sequentialthinkingno sensitive capability
  • set_default_agentno sensitive capability
  • toggle-simulated-loggingno sensitive capability
  • toggle-subscriber-updatesno sensitive capability
  • trigger-elicitation-requestno sensitive capability
  • trigger-long-running-operationno sensitive capability
  • trigger-sampling-requestno sensitive capability
  • type_textno sensitive capability
  • unregister_agentno sensitive capability
  • waitno sensitive capability

Toxic flows 1

Cross-tool combinations that form a data-exfiltration primitive (untrusted input → sensitive source → external sink).

What this scan could not see

Versions 1

Scan history per published version. The engine is deterministic — the same version always yields the same score, so a changed score means the package itself changed.

VersionScoreFindingsEngineScanned
v2.1.0 latest B 89/100 19 1.13.0 2026-08-25

Embed this score

Show this server's live Trust Score in your README, docs or website. The badge is served straight from the registry and updates automatically after every rescan — no API key needed. It links back to this page, so anyone who sees the grade can also read the findings behind it instead of taking a number on faith.

MCP Trust Score: B · 89/100
Markdown (GitHub README)
[![MCP Trust Score](https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/bridge-mcp/badge.svg)](https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/bridge-mcp)
HTML
<a href="https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/bridge-mcp"><img src="https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/bridge-mcp/badge.svg" alt="MCP Trust Score" height="20"></a>
Prefer shields.io styling? Point it at https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/bridge-mcp/badge.json via https://img.shields.io/endpoint?url=…

Verify this score yourself

The score above is reproducible: the same package version always yields the same result. Run it locally or over the free API — no account, no LLM, fully deterministic.

npx mcptrustchecker scan bridge-mcp --online --registry pypi

Use the free API → How scoring works

Other implementations of Bridge 10

Independent packages implementing the same tool, scanned with the same engine. Compare all 11 side by side →

More in Developer Tools