@atezer/figma-mcp-bridge
npm
v1.9.11
Published by @atezer — no publish provenance, so origin is unverified, but the source is public: the repository link below is self-declared yet readable, so you can inspect the code before adopting it.
F-MCP ATezer: MCP server and Figma plugin bridge for Claude/Cursor. No REST token required.
The grade answers one question — how safe is this server for you to adopt — so it is computed in two auditable stages. Nothing below is an opinion or an LLM's guess; every line is a real term the deterministic engine applied, and the same input always yields the same number.
1. Threat score — 100 − 21.7 = 78. What the published surface and source actually contain:
| Points | What was found | Category |
|---|---|---|
| −15.4 | Assembled command execution and dynamic evaluation in the same server MTC-SRC-011 | injection |
| −6.3 | Untrusted input concatenated into a command sink MTC-SRC-009 | injection |
2. Client adoption risk — 78 − 11 = 67. Three small, subtract-only factors that reflect your risk in adopting it — a clean scan proves less on a powerful, unverified or barely-inspectable package, so the grade says so plainly:
| Points | Adoption-risk factor |
|---|---|
| −10 | capability blast radius (critical) — client exposure if the model is manipulated |
| −1 | publisher verification (public source) — no provenance, but the source is public and inspectable |
Capability observations and info notes are shown under Findings but never scored.
Open any row's finding below for the file, line and evidence behind a deduction.
In the server's implementation (`f-mcp-plugin/code.js:641`): Evaluating a runtime value as code (rather than a fixed literal) executes whatever reaches it — a direct RCE primitive, and almost never necessary in legitimate code. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.
Evidence: E codePromise = eval(wrappedCode); } catch (syntaxError) { // Log the actual syntax error message
Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.
Location: server f-mcp-plugin/code.js
The implementation both builds shell commands out of runtime values (`dist/core/plugin-bridge-server.js`) and evaluates runtime values as code (`f-mcp-plugin/code.js`). Each is a separate arbitrary-execution primitive; a server exposing both gives anything that reaches either one a direct path to running attacker-chosen code. These two sinks are in different files — confirm whether they are actually connected, or are unrelated code paths (e.g. a vendored bundle plus a CLI wrapper).
Fix: Remove the dynamic eval, and pass command arguments as an argv array instead of building a shell string. If both are genuinely required, constrain and validate every value that can reach them.
Location: server implementation
In the server's implementation (`f-mcp-plugin/code.js:641`): Evaluating strings as code is the most direct RCE primitive; if any tool input reaches it, the server executes attacker-chosen code. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.
Evidence: E codePromise = eval(wrappedCode); } catch (syntaxError) { // Log the actual syntax error message
Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.
Location: server f-mcp-plugin/code.js
In the server's implementation (`dist/core/plugin-bridge-server.js:20`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.
Evidence: port { execSync } from "child_process"; import { logger } from "./logger.js"; import { auditTool, auditPlugin } from "./
Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.
Location: server dist/core/plugin-bridge-server.js
In the server's implementation (`dist/local-plugin-only.js:2135`): A hardcoded outbound call to a fixed external host inside server code is a classic exfiltration/telemetry channel — especially paired with reads of local data. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.
Evidence: const res = await fetch("https://api.figma.com/v1/me", { headers: { "X-Figma-Token": token },
Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.
Location: server dist/local-plugin-only.js
In the server's implementation (`dist/core/plugin-bridge-server.js:72`): A shell/process command assembled from concatenated or interpolated values is command injection when any part is attacker-influenced — the OWASP canonical RCE flow. Verify what reaches the interpolated value. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.
Evidence: const line = execSync(`ps -p ${pid} -o ppid=,comm=`, { timeout: 1000 }).toString().trim(); co
Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.
Location: server dist/core/plugin-bridge-server.js
In the server's implementation (`dist/core/bootstrap-injector.js:90`): Loading a module chosen at runtime (from a variable) can pull in and run attacker-influenced code paths. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.
Evidence: secenek sun (a) library import (b) figma_create_mini_ds (c) template (d) linter-off — secim yapmadan createFrame YASAK";
Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.
Location: server dist/core/bootstrap-injector.js
Each tool and what it can reach — statically extracted from the published source.
figma_get_prototype_connectionsingests untrusted inputfigma_get_token_browserreads sensitive datafigma_add_modeno sensitive capabilityfigma_arrange_component_setno sensitive capabilityfigma_batch_create_variablesno sensitive capabilityfigma_batch_update_variablesno sensitive capabilityfigma_bind_variableno sensitive capabilityfigma_capture_screenshotno sensitive capabilityfigma_check_design_parityno sensitive capabilityfigma_clear_consoleno sensitive capabilityfigma_clear_rest_tokenno sensitive capabilityfigma_clone_screen_to_deviceno sensitive capabilityfigma_create_frameno sensitive capabilityfigma_create_groupno sensitive capabilityfigma_create_interactionno sensitive capabilityfigma_create_mini_dsno sensitive capabilityfigma_create_prototype_connectionno sensitive capabilityfigma_create_rectangleno sensitive capabilityfigma_create_textno sensitive capabilityfigma_create_variableno sensitive capabilityfigma_create_variable_collectionno sensitive capabilityfigma_delete_variableno sensitive capabilityfigma_delete_variable_collectionno sensitive capabilityfigma_executeno sensitive capabilityfigma_export_nodesno sensitive capabilityfigma_get_code_connectno sensitive capabilityfigma_get_componentno sensitive capabilityfigma_get_component_for_developmentno sensitive capabilityfigma_get_component_imageno sensitive capabilityfigma_get_console_logsno sensitive capabilityfigma_get_design_contextno sensitive capabilityfigma_get_design_system_summaryno sensitive capabilityfigma_get_file_datano sensitive capabilityfigma_get_library_variablesno sensitive capabilityfigma_get_rest_token_statusno sensitive capabilityfigma_get_statusno sensitive capabilityfigma_get_stylesno sensitive capabilityfigma_get_variablesno sensitive capabilityfigma_import_styleno sensitive capabilityfigma_instantiate_componentno sensitive capabilityfigma_list_connected_filesno sensitive capabilityfigma_plugin_diagnosticsno sensitive capabilityfigma_refresh_variablesno sensitive capabilityfigma_rename_modeno sensitive capabilityfigma_rename_variableno sensitive capabilityfigma_rest_apino sensitive capabilityfigma_scan_ds_complianceno sensitive capabilityfigma_search_assetsno sensitive capabilityfigma_search_componentsno sensitive capabilityfigma_set_descriptionno sensitive capabilityfigma_set_flow_starting_pointno sensitive capabilityfigma_set_instance_propertiesno sensitive capabilityfigma_set_portno sensitive capabilityfigma_set_rest_tokenno sensitive capabilityfigma_set_scroll_behaviorno sensitive capabilityfigma_setup_design_tokensno sensitive capabilityfigma_update_variableno sensitive capabilityfigma_useno sensitive capabilityfigma_validate_screenno sensitive capabilityfigma_watch_consoleno sensitive capabilityScan history per published version. The engine is deterministic — the same version always yields the same score, so a changed score means the package itself changed.
| Version | Score | Findings | Engine | Scanned |
|---|---|---|---|---|
v1.9.11 latest |
D 67/100 | 7 | 1.13.0 | 2026-09-07 |
Show this server's live Trust Score in your README, docs or website. The badge is served straight from the registry and updates automatically after every rescan — no API key needed. It links back to this page, so anyone who sees the grade can also read the findings behind it instead of taking a number on faith.
The score above is reproducible: the same package version always yields the same result. Run it locally or over the free API — no account, no LLM, fully deterministic.
npx mcptrustchecker scan @atezer/figma-mcp-bridge --online
Independent packages implementing the same tool, scanned with the same engine. Compare all 5 side by side →
MCP server enabling Claude to read and manipulate Figma documents via WebSocket bridge
MCP server that bridges Figma plugin data to AI tools without hitting API rate limits
MCP server that bridges Figma plugin data to AI tools without hitting API rate limits
MCP server for programmatic Figma design modification - 70+ tools for AI-powered design
Turn designs into shipped parts: quote 3D printing, CNC, and decals, then check out.
Aleph's official SiliconFlow media-generation MCP server (image / video / TTS)
MCP server for image generation using Google Gemini AI
Ambience AI MCP Server - Generate images, videos, and audio through Model Context Protocol
MCP server exposing every endpoint of the AstroWay Calculation API as tools — natal, synastry, transits, Vedic dashas, Tarot, Numerology, Human Design, AI horoscopes — for Claude Desktop, Cursor and any MCP-compatible AI agent.
Audio-guide and trip-planning tools for 1,100+ cities from Audiala. Free, no API key.