agent-collab-mcp
npm
v2.3.0
Published by dolores-r2d2 — no publish provenance, so origin is unverified, but the source is public: the repository link below is self-declared yet readable, so you can inspect the code before adopting it.
The grade answers one question — how safe is this server for you to adopt — so it is computed in two auditable stages. Nothing below is an opinion or an LLM's guess; every line is a real term the deterministic engine applied, and the same input always yields the same number.
1. Threat score — 100 − 6.3 = 94. What the published surface and source actually contain:
| Points | What was found | Category |
|---|---|---|
| −6.3 | Untrusted input concatenated into a command sink MTC-SRC-009 | injection |
2. Client adoption risk — 94 − 7 = 87. Three small, subtract-only factors that reflect your risk in adopting it — a clean scan proves less on a powerful, unverified or barely-inspectable package, so the grade says so plainly:
| Points | Adoption-risk factor |
|---|---|
| −6 | capability blast radius (high) — client exposure if the model is manipulated |
| −1 | publisher verification (public source) — no provenance, but the source is public and inspectable |
Capability observations and info notes are shown under Findings but never scored.
Open any row's finding below for the file, line and evidence behind a deduction.
In the server's implementation (`build/dispatch.js:6`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.
Evidence: spawn, execSync } from "child_process"; import path from "path"; import fs from "fs"; import { getEngineMode, getRole, g
Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.
Location: server build/dispatch.js
In the server's implementation (`build/index.js:4`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.
Evidence: import { spawn } from "child_process"; import path from "path"; import fs from "fs"; import { registerStatusTools } fro
Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.
Location: server build/index.js
In the server's implementation (`build/dispatch.js:15`): A shell/process command assembled from concatenated or interpolated values is command injection when any part is attacker-influenced — the OWASP canonical RCE flow. Verify what reaches the interpolated value. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.
Evidence: md) { try { execSync(`which ${cmd}`, { stdio: "ignore" }); return true; } catch { re
Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.
Location: server build/dispatch.js
In a packaging/dev/install script (shipped, but not the server runtime) (`build/tools/setup.js:4`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.
Evidence: port { execSync } from "child_process"; import { getDb, setActiveStrategy, setEngineMode, getRole, getProjectDir, setPro
Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.
Location: server build/tools/setup.js
In a packaging/dev/install script (shipped, but not the server runtime) (`build/tools/status.js:1`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.
Evidence: port { execSync } from "child_process"; import fs from "fs"; import path from "path"; import { getDb, getRole, getActive
Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.
Location: server build/tools/status.js
Each tool and what it can reach — statically extracted from the published source.
add_commentno sensitive capabilityarchive_epicno sensitive capabilitycancel_taskno sensitive capabilitycheck_conflictsno sensitive capabilityclaim_taskno sensitive capabilitycreate_taskno sensitive capabilityget_active_strategyno sensitive capabilityget_codebase_contextno sensitive capabilityget_commentsno sensitive capabilityget_contextno sensitive capabilityget_dashboard_infono sensitive capabilityget_epicno sensitive capabilityget_metricsno sensitive capabilityget_my_statusno sensitive capabilityget_project_overviewno sensitive capabilityget_review_feedbackno sensitive capabilityget_taskno sensitive capabilityinvoke_architectno sensitive capabilitylist_epicsno sensitive capabilitylist_strategiesno sensitive capabilitylog_activityno sensitive capabilitynotify_builderno sensitive capabilityrelease_filesno sensitive capabilityreserve_filesno sensitive capabilityrestore_epicno sensitive capabilityreview_taskno sensitive capabilityrun_loopno sensitive capabilitysave_planno sensitive capabilityset_contextno sensitive capabilityset_engine_modeno sensitive capabilityset_strategyno sensitive capabilitysetup_projectno sensitive capabilitysubmit_for_reviewno sensitive capabilitytrigger_reviewno sensitive capabilityScan history per published version. The engine is deterministic — the same version always yields the same score, so a changed score means the package itself changed.
| Version | Score | Findings | Engine | Scanned |
|---|---|---|---|---|
v2.3.0 latest |
B 87/100 | 5 | 1.8.0 | 2026-07-23 |
Show this server's live Trust Score in your README, docs or website. The badge is served straight from the registry and updates automatically after every rescan — no API key needed. It links back to this page, so anyone who sees the grade can also read the findings behind it instead of taking a number on faith.
The score above is reproducible: the same package version always yields the same result. Run it locally or over the free API — no account, no LLM, fully deterministic.
npx mcptrustchecker scan agent-collab-mcp --online
Independent packages implementing the same tool, scanned with the same engine. Compare all 2 side by side →
Security scan results for the 1stay MCP server.
Security scan results for the Adguard Home MCP server.
Security scan results for the Ado Browser MCP server.
Security scan results for the Adobe Experience Dev MCP server.
Security scan results for the Aemet MCP server.
Security scan results for the Affinity Mcp Bridge MCP server.