Aethereum MCP Server

aethereum npm v0.9.9

Published by br9704 — no publish provenance, so origin is unverified, but the source is public: the repository link below is self-declared yet readable, so you can inspect the code before adopting it.

The coordination layer for AI coding agents: contracts, intent, and collision alerts across machines.

Trust grade
A
93/100
Last scanned get badge →
Trust
A · 93/100
Adoption risk for you: the threat score, then adjusted down for blast radius, publisher verification and how much the scan could see. Deterministic; every point is auditable.
Capability
High
Blast radius if it went rogue — what the server’s tools could reach. Independent of trust.
Coverage
Source
How much the scan could actually inspect. Shallow coverage is stated, never hidden.
Share this Trust Score
𝕏 Share LinkedIn Reddit
A Why this grade threat 100 − adoption risk = 93/100

The grade answers one question — how safe is this server for you to adopt — so it is computed in two auditable stages. Nothing below is an opinion or an LLM's guess; every line is a real term the deterministic engine applied, and the same input always yields the same number.

1. Threat score — 100 − 0 = 100. What the published surface and source actually contain:

The deterministic scan raised no scored threat in the surface it inspected — the threat score stayed at 100. Capability observations and advisory notes are recorded but never lower it.

2. Client adoption risk — 100 − 7 = 93. Three small, subtract-only factors that reflect your risk in adopting it — a clean scan proves less on a powerful, unverified or barely-inspectable package, so the grade says so plainly:

PointsAdoption-risk factor
−6 capability blast radius (high) — client exposure if the model is manipulated
−1 publisher verification (public source) — no provenance, but the source is public and inspectable

Capability observations and info notes are shown under Findings but never scored. Open any row's finding below for the file, line and evidence behind a deduction.

Findings 9

high Dynamic code execution in server code (dist/sdk-5FRGHEGL.js)MTC-SRC-001

In the server's implementation (`dist/sdk-5FRGHEGL.js:3042`): Evaluating strings as code is the most direct RCE primitive; if any tool input reaches it, the server executes attacker-chosen code. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: ss(V, $); let N = Function(`${y0.default.self}`, `${y0.default.scope}`, V)(this, this.scope.get()); if (this

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server dist/sdk-5FRGHEGL.js

high Shell/command execution in server code (dist/chunk-3MMBQP4F.js)MTC-SRC-002

In the server's implementation (`dist/chunk-3MMBQP4F.js:20`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: FileSync, spawn } from "child_process"; function sanitizeSessionName(name) { return name.replace(/[.:$%]/g, "_"); } va

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server dist/chunk-3MMBQP4F.js

high Shell/command execution in server code (dist/chunk-BFVTAROS.js)MTC-SRC-002

In the server's implementation (`dist/chunk-BFVTAROS.js:48`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: { execFileSync } from "child_process"; import { join as join3, resolve, basename } from "path"; import { homedir as hom

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server dist/chunk-BFVTAROS.js

high Shell/command execution in server code (dist/chunk-VJZJ4SQY.js)MTC-SRC-002

In the server's implementation (`dist/chunk-VJZJ4SQY.js:7`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: { execFileSync } from "child_process"; import { realpathSync } from "fs"; import { dirname, join, relative, resolve } f

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server dist/chunk-VJZJ4SQY.js

high Shell/command execution in server code (dist/chunk-WFJLCKOP.js)MTC-SRC-002

In the server's implementation (`dist/chunk-WFJLCKOP.js:6`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: import { spawn } from "child_process"; import { readFileSync, writeFileSync, mkdirSync } from "fs"; import { homedir }

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server dist/chunk-WFJLCKOP.js

high Shell/command execution in server code (dist/cli/index.js)MTC-SRC-002

In the server's implementation (`dist/cli/index.js:195`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: n, execFileSync } from "child_process"; import { randomUUID } from "crypto"; import { createRequire } from "module"; imp

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server dist/cli/index.js

high Shell/command execution in server code (dist/sdk-5FRGHEGL.js)MTC-SRC-002

In the server's implementation (`dist/sdk-5FRGHEGL.js:5`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: execFile as E6$ } from "child_process"; import { randomUUID as rz } from "crypto"; import { createReadStream as b6$, rea

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server dist/sdk-5FRGHEGL.js

high Shell/command execution in server code (dist/share-terminal-77YJXHBO.js)MTC-SRC-002

In the server's implementation (`dist/share-terminal-77YJXHBO.js:22`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: { execFileSync } from "child_process"; import { appendFileSync, mkdirSync } from "fs"; import { join } from "path"; imp

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server dist/share-terminal-77YJXHBO.js

medium Untrusted input can drive an external actionMTC-FLOW-005

Untrusted-input tools ([aethereum__fetch_code, aethereum__list_code]) co-exist with external-action tools ([send_message, aethereum__send_message]). A prompt injection could cause unwanted external actions, though no direct sensitive-data leak path was found.

Evidence: untrusted [aethereum__fetch_code, aethereum__list_code] → sinks [send_message, aethereum__send_message]

Fix: Require confirmation for state-changing/egress actions triggered after processing untrusted content.

Location: flow aethereum__fetch_code → send_message

Tools 49

Each tool and what it can reach — statically extracted from the published source.

  • aethereum__fetch_codeingests untrusted input
  • aethereum__list_codeingests untrusted input
  • aethereum__send_messagenetwork egress
  • send_messagenetwork egress
  • aethereum__admin__kickno sensitive capability
  • aethereum__admin__muteno sensitive capability
  • aethereum__admin__set_mode_forno sensitive capability
  • aethereum__admin__unmuteno sensitive capability
  • aethereum__ask_humanno sensitive capability
  • aethereum__await_team_eventsno sensitive capability
Show 39 more tools ↓
  • aethereum__blast_radiusno sensitive capability
  • aethereum__catch_upno sensitive capability
  • aethereum__claimno sensitive capability
  • aethereum__claim_ticketno sensitive capability
  • aethereum__clear_directiveno sensitive capability
  • aethereum__create_ticketno sensitive capability
  • aethereum__declare_contractno sensitive capability
  • aethereum__depend_onno sensitive capability
  • aethereum__finalize_proposalno sensitive capability
  • aethereum__get_contract_historyno sensitive capability
  • aethereum__get_team_contextno sensitive capability
  • aethereum__join_roomno sensitive capability
  • aethereum__leave_roomno sensitive capability
  • aethereum__linked_prsno sensitive capability
  • aethereum__offer_handoffno sensitive capability
  • aethereum__propose_contractno sensitive capability
  • aethereum__record_decisionno sensitive capability
  • aethereum__record_verificationno sensitive capability
  • aethereum__releaseno sensitive capability
  • aethereum__respond_to_proposalno sensitive capability
  • aethereum__room_viewno sensitive capability
  • aethereum__search_by_messageno sensitive capability
  • aethereum__search_by_textno sensitive capability
  • aethereum__search_memoryno sensitive capability
  • aethereum__set_briefno sensitive capability
  • aethereum__set_contract_statusno sensitive capability
  • aethereum__set_directiveno sensitive capability
  • aethereum__set_goalno sensitive capability
  • aethereum__set_modeno sensitive capability
  • aethereum__set_rulesetno sensitive capability
  • aethereum__share_codeno sensitive capability
  • aethereum__share_intentno sensitive capability
  • aethereum__share_planno sensitive capability
  • aethereum__update_goalno sensitive capability
  • aethereum__update_ticketno sensitive capability
  • aethereum_replyno sensitive capability
  • catch_upno sensitive capability
  • search_by_messageno sensitive capability
  • search_by_textno sensitive capability

Toxic flows 1

Cross-tool combinations that form a data-exfiltration primitive (untrusted input → sensitive source → external sink).

What this scan could not see

Versions 7

Scan history per published version. The engine is deterministic — the same version always yields the same score, so a changed score means the package itself changed.

VersionScoreFindingsEngineScanned
v0.9.9 latest A 93/100 9 1.13.0 2026-09-09
v0.9.3 A 93/100 9 1.12.1 2026-08-07
v0.9.2 A 93/100 9 1.12.1 2026-08-06
v0.8.0 A 93/100 7 1.12.1 2026-08-05
v0.7.4 A 93/100 7 1.12.1 2026-08-04
Show 2 more versions ↓
v0.7.2 A 93/100 6 1.12.1 2026-07-28
v0.6.1 A 93/100 5 1.10.0 2026-07-27

Embed this score

Show this server's live Trust Score in your README, docs or website. The badge is served straight from the registry and updates automatically after every rescan — no API key needed. It links back to this page, so anyone who sees the grade can also read the findings behind it instead of taking a number on faith.

MCP Trust Score: A · 93/100
Markdown (GitHub README)
[![MCP Trust Score](https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/aethereum/badge.svg)](https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/aethereum)
HTML
<a href="https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/aethereum"><img src="https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/aethereum/badge.svg" alt="MCP Trust Score" height="20"></a>
Prefer shields.io styling? Point it at https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/aethereum/badge.json via https://img.shields.io/endpoint?url=…

Verify this score yourself

The score above is reproducible: the same package version always yields the same result. Run it locally or over the free API — no account, no LLM, fully deterministic.

npx mcptrustchecker scan aethereum --online

Use the free API → How scoring works

More in Developer Tools