aethereum
npm
v0.9.9
Published by br9704 — no publish provenance, so origin is unverified, but the source is public: the repository link below is self-declared yet readable, so you can inspect the code before adopting it.
The coordination layer for AI coding agents: contracts, intent, and collision alerts across machines.
The grade answers one question — how safe is this server for you to adopt — so it is computed in two auditable stages. Nothing below is an opinion or an LLM's guess; every line is a real term the deterministic engine applied, and the same input always yields the same number.
1. Threat score — 100 − 0 = 100. What the published surface and source actually contain:
The deterministic scan raised no scored threat in the surface it inspected — the threat score stayed at 100. Capability observations and advisory notes are recorded but never lower it.
2. Client adoption risk — 100 − 7 = 93. Three small, subtract-only factors that reflect your risk in adopting it — a clean scan proves less on a powerful, unverified or barely-inspectable package, so the grade says so plainly:
| Points | Adoption-risk factor |
|---|---|
| −6 | capability blast radius (high) — client exposure if the model is manipulated |
| −1 | publisher verification (public source) — no provenance, but the source is public and inspectable |
Capability observations and info notes are shown under Findings but never scored.
Open any row's finding below for the file, line and evidence behind a deduction.
In the server's implementation (`dist/sdk-5FRGHEGL.js:3042`): Evaluating strings as code is the most direct RCE primitive; if any tool input reaches it, the server executes attacker-chosen code. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.
Evidence: ss(V, $); let N = Function(`${y0.default.self}`, `${y0.default.scope}`, V)(this, this.scope.get()); if (this
Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.
Location: server dist/sdk-5FRGHEGL.js
In the server's implementation (`dist/chunk-3MMBQP4F.js:20`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.
Evidence: FileSync, spawn } from "child_process"; function sanitizeSessionName(name) { return name.replace(/[.:$%]/g, "_"); } va
Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.
Location: server dist/chunk-3MMBQP4F.js
In the server's implementation (`dist/chunk-BFVTAROS.js:48`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.
Evidence: { execFileSync } from "child_process"; import { join as join3, resolve, basename } from "path"; import { homedir as hom
Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.
Location: server dist/chunk-BFVTAROS.js
In the server's implementation (`dist/chunk-VJZJ4SQY.js:7`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.
Evidence: { execFileSync } from "child_process"; import { realpathSync } from "fs"; import { dirname, join, relative, resolve } f
Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.
Location: server dist/chunk-VJZJ4SQY.js
In the server's implementation (`dist/chunk-WFJLCKOP.js:6`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.
Evidence: import { spawn } from "child_process"; import { readFileSync, writeFileSync, mkdirSync } from "fs"; import { homedir }
Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.
Location: server dist/chunk-WFJLCKOP.js
In the server's implementation (`dist/cli/index.js:195`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.
Evidence: n, execFileSync } from "child_process"; import { randomUUID } from "crypto"; import { createRequire } from "module"; imp
Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.
Location: server dist/cli/index.js
In the server's implementation (`dist/sdk-5FRGHEGL.js:5`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.
Evidence: execFile as E6$ } from "child_process"; import { randomUUID as rz } from "crypto"; import { createReadStream as b6$, rea
Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.
Location: server dist/sdk-5FRGHEGL.js
In the server's implementation (`dist/share-terminal-77YJXHBO.js:22`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.
Evidence: { execFileSync } from "child_process"; import { appendFileSync, mkdirSync } from "fs"; import { join } from "path"; imp
Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.
Location: server dist/share-terminal-77YJXHBO.js
Untrusted-input tools ([aethereum__fetch_code, aethereum__list_code]) co-exist with external-action tools ([send_message, aethereum__send_message]). A prompt injection could cause unwanted external actions, though no direct sensitive-data leak path was found.
Evidence: untrusted [aethereum__fetch_code, aethereum__list_code] → sinks [send_message, aethereum__send_message]
Fix: Require confirmation for state-changing/egress actions triggered after processing untrusted content.
Location: flow aethereum__fetch_code → send_message
Each tool and what it can reach — statically extracted from the published source.
aethereum__fetch_codeingests untrusted inputaethereum__list_codeingests untrusted inputaethereum__send_messagenetwork egresssend_messagenetwork egressaethereum__admin__kickno sensitive capabilityaethereum__admin__muteno sensitive capabilityaethereum__admin__set_mode_forno sensitive capabilityaethereum__admin__unmuteno sensitive capabilityaethereum__ask_humanno sensitive capabilityaethereum__await_team_eventsno sensitive capabilityaethereum__blast_radiusno sensitive capabilityaethereum__catch_upno sensitive capabilityaethereum__claimno sensitive capabilityaethereum__claim_ticketno sensitive capabilityaethereum__clear_directiveno sensitive capabilityaethereum__create_ticketno sensitive capabilityaethereum__declare_contractno sensitive capabilityaethereum__depend_onno sensitive capabilityaethereum__finalize_proposalno sensitive capabilityaethereum__get_contract_historyno sensitive capabilityaethereum__get_team_contextno sensitive capabilityaethereum__join_roomno sensitive capabilityaethereum__leave_roomno sensitive capabilityaethereum__linked_prsno sensitive capabilityaethereum__offer_handoffno sensitive capabilityaethereum__propose_contractno sensitive capabilityaethereum__record_decisionno sensitive capabilityaethereum__record_verificationno sensitive capabilityaethereum__releaseno sensitive capabilityaethereum__respond_to_proposalno sensitive capabilityaethereum__room_viewno sensitive capabilityaethereum__search_by_messageno sensitive capabilityaethereum__search_by_textno sensitive capabilityaethereum__search_memoryno sensitive capabilityaethereum__set_briefno sensitive capabilityaethereum__set_contract_statusno sensitive capabilityaethereum__set_directiveno sensitive capabilityaethereum__set_goalno sensitive capabilityaethereum__set_modeno sensitive capabilityaethereum__set_rulesetno sensitive capabilityaethereum__share_codeno sensitive capabilityaethereum__share_intentno sensitive capabilityaethereum__share_planno sensitive capabilityaethereum__update_goalno sensitive capabilityaethereum__update_ticketno sensitive capabilityaethereum_replyno sensitive capabilitycatch_upno sensitive capabilitysearch_by_messageno sensitive capabilitysearch_by_textno sensitive capabilityCross-tool combinations that form a data-exfiltration primitive (untrusted input → sensitive source → external sink).
Scan history per published version. The engine is deterministic — the same version always yields the same score, so a changed score means the package itself changed.
| Version | Score | Findings | Engine | Scanned |
|---|---|---|---|---|
v0.9.9 latest |
A 93/100 | 9 | 1.13.0 | 2026-09-09 |
v0.9.3 |
A 93/100 | 9 | 1.12.1 | 2026-08-07 |
v0.9.2 |
A 93/100 | 9 | 1.12.1 | 2026-08-06 |
v0.8.0 |
A 93/100 | 7 | 1.12.1 | 2026-08-05 |
v0.7.4 |
A 93/100 | 7 | 1.12.1 | 2026-08-04 |
v0.7.2 |
A 93/100 | 6 | 1.12.1 | 2026-07-28 |
v0.6.1 |
A 93/100 | 5 | 1.10.0 | 2026-07-27 |
Show this server's live Trust Score in your README, docs or website. The badge is served straight from the registry and updates automatically after every rescan — no API key needed. It links back to this page, so anyone who sees the grade can also read the findings behind it instead of taking a number on faith.
The score above is reproducible: the same package version always yields the same result. Run it locally or over the free API — no account, no LLM, fully deterministic.
npx mcptrustchecker scan aethereum --online
Hotel booking MCP server — 300K+ properties, real confirmation numbers, loyalty programs. Builders monetize every booking via Stripe Connect. The first MCP server that completes real hotel reservations inside AI conversations.
Manage AdGuard Home through AI assistants
Read-only Azure DevOps for MCP clients using only your existing browser session — no PAT, no Azure CLI. Browse work items, pull requests, comments, attachments and Artifacts feeds across every project, repo and feed you can access.
MCP server for Adobe Experience Manager Assets integration development
Servidor MCP para el tiempo oficial de España (API pública OpenData de AEMET). Predicción, observación y avisos como herramientas MCP tipadas.
A standalone MCP stdio bridge for Affinity by Canva's local MCP SSE server.