Hardware Probe MCP Server
@yamaru-eu/hardware-probe
npm
v1.1.3
Published by @yamaru-eu — no publish provenance, so origin is unverified, but the source is public: the repository link below is self-declared yet readable, so you can inspect the code before adopting it.
Hardware probe for performance diagnostics, thermal monitoring, and LLM optimization.
The grade answers one question — how safe is this server for you to adopt — so it is computed in two auditable stages. Nothing below is an opinion or an LLM's guess; every line is a real term the deterministic engine applied, and the same input always yields the same number.
1. Threat score — 100 − 0 = 100. What the published surface and source actually contain:
The deterministic scan raised no scored threat in the surface it inspected — the threat score stayed at 100. Capability observations and advisory notes are recorded but never lower it.
2. Client adoption risk — 100 − 7 = 93. Three small, subtract-only factors that reflect your risk in adopting it — a clean scan proves less on a powerful, unverified or barely-inspectable package, so the grade says so plainly:
| Points | Adoption-risk factor |
|---|---|
| −6 | capability blast radius (high) — client exposure if the model is manipulated |
| −1 | publisher verification (public source) — no provenance, but the source is public and inspectable |
Capability observations and info notes are shown under Findings but never scored.
Open any row's finding below for the file, line and evidence behind a deduction.
Findings 2
high Shell/command execution in server code (dist/hardware.service.js)MTC-SRC-002
In the server's implementation (`dist/hardware.service.js:2`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.
Evidence: { execFile } from "node:child_process"; import { readFile, stat } from "node:fs/promises"; import { promisify } from "no
Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.
Location: server dist/hardware.service.js
high Shell/command execution in server code (dist/scanner.service.js)MTC-SRC-002
In the server's implementation (`dist/scanner.service.js:1`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.
Evidence: import { exec } from 'child_process'; import { promisify } from 'util'; import os from 'os'; import fs from 'fs'; cons
Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.
Location: server dist/scanner.service.js
Tools 11
Each tool and what it can reach — statically extracted from the published source.
analyze_ram_pressureingests untrusted inputanalyze_inference_configno sensitive capabilityanalyze_local_systemno sensitive capabilityanalyze_performanceno sensitive capabilitycheck_llm_compatibilityno sensitive capabilitycheck_storage_healthno sensitive capabilitydiagnose_antivirus_impactno sensitive capabilityget_inference_expert_knowledgeno sensitive capabilityget_llm_recommendationsno sensitive capabilitymonitor_system_healthno sensitive capability
Show 1 more tool ↓
thermal_profileno sensitive capability
What this scan could not see
- Tools were statically extracted from the published source (11 recovered), not enumerated from a running server. Tool-poisoning, Unicode-smuggling, capability and toxic-flow analysis ran on this inferred surface, but a mis-parsed registration could be missed or mis-attributed, so tool-derived findings are capped below “confirmed”. To grade the real runtime surface, scan the running server: --command "npx -y <package>".
Versions 1
Scan history per published version. The engine is deterministic — the same version always yields the same score, so a changed score means the package itself changed.
| Version | Score | Findings | Engine | Scanned |
|---|---|---|---|---|
v1.1.3 latest |
A 93/100 | 2 | 1.13.0 | 2026-09-07 |
Embed this score
Show this server's live Trust Score in your README, docs or website. The badge is served straight from the registry and updates automatically after every rescan — no API key needed. It links back to this page, so anyone who sees the grade can also read the findings behind it instead of taking a number on faith.
Verify this score yourself
The score above is reproducible: the same package version always yields the same result. Run it locally or over the free API — no account, no LLM, fully deterministic.
npx mcptrustchecker scan @yamaru-eu/hardware-probe --onlineMore in Analytics & Monitoring
Public-safe MCP admin discovery contract descriptors and response builders.
Pokemon Champions battle advisor MCP server
Airflow MCP server — DAG list, runs, task instances, log tails, trigger and clear over the Airflow REST API
MCP analytics wrapper SDK that instruments MCP tool declarations with telemetry.
AI-ready GIS, geofencing, DataSynch, CRM, inventory, routing, APIs, telemetry and workflows.
AI-native social listening. Monitor buying signals and run GTM workflows via natural language.