@yagyeshvyas/vibeguard
npm
v1.3.0
Published by @yagyeshvyas — no publish provenance, so origin is unverified, but the source is public: the repository link below is self-declared yet readable, so you can inspect the code before adopting it.
Security scanner + AI agent firewall. Blocks secret/PII exfiltration in real time. 752 rules, 82 MCP tools (agent-scan, mcp-audit, guard-action, generate-sbom, dep-reachability, license-compliance), AST taint analysis. Offline, zero telemetry, zero depend
The grade answers one question — how safe is this server for you to adopt — so it is computed in two auditable stages. Nothing below is an opinion or an LLM's guess; every line is a real term the deterministic engine applied, and the same input always yields the same number.
1. Threat score — 100 − 12.5 = 88. What the published surface and source actually contain:
| Points | What was found | Category |
|---|---|---|
| −9.5 | Untrusted input concatenated into a command sink ×2 MTC-SRC-009 | injection |
| −1.8 | Shell command embedded in tool metadata ×2 MTC-INJ-CMD-1 | injection |
| −1.2 | Package runs install-time scripts MTC-SUP-010 | supply-chain |
2. Client adoption risk — 88 − 7 = 81. Three small, subtract-only factors that reflect your risk in adopting it — a clean scan proves less on a powerful, unverified or barely-inspectable package, so the grade says so plainly:
| Points | Adoption-risk factor |
|---|---|
| −6 | capability blast radius (high) — client exposure if the model is manipulated |
| −1 | publisher verification (public source) — no provenance, but the source is public and inspectable |
Capability observations and info notes are shown under Findings but never scored.
Open any row's finding below for the file, line and evidence behind a deduction.
Tools that read sensitive data ([config_dump]) and tools that can send data out ([guard_action, check_command, slack_notify, agent_guard, sandbox_exec]) are exposed together. An agent can move private data to the sink.
Evidence: sources [config_dump] → sinks [guard_action, check_command, slack_notify, agent_guard, sandbox_exec]
Fix: Keep secret-reading and egress capabilities on separate, separately-approved servers.
Location: flow config_dump → guard_action
In the server's implementation (`src/interceptor.js:44`): Reading private keys / cloud credentials, or serializing the whole environment, is a sensitive-data source that becomes exfiltration when combined with any egress. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.
Evidence: ssh', '.aws', '.gnupg', '.npmrc', '.gitconfig'], // Block commands matching these patterns blockCommands: ['rm -rf',
Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.
Location: server src/interceptor.js
In the server's implementation (`src/rules-pack.js:1173`): Reading private keys / cloud credentials, or serializing the whole environment, is a sensitive-data source that becomes exfiltration when combined with any egress. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.
Evidence: rnal packages; configure .npmrc scopes correctly.', owasp: 'A08:2025 Software and Data Integrity Failures', cwe:
Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.
Location: server src/rules-pack.js
In the server's implementation (`src/rules.js:225`): Reading private keys / cloud credentials, or serializing the whole environment, is a sensitive-data source that becomes exfiltration when combined with any egress. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.
Evidence: s token (also flagged in .npmrc).', fix: 'Remove it, use an environment variable / CI secret, and revoke it on npmj
Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.
Location: server src/rules.js
In the server's implementation (`src/scanner.js:74`): Reading private keys / cloud credentials, or serializing the whole environment, is a sensitive-data source that becomes exfiltration when combined with any egress. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.
Evidence: , '.env.production', '.npmrc', 'Dockerfile', '.dockerenv', ]); const MAX_FILE_BYTES = 2 * 1024 * 1024; // 2MB — s
Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.
Location: server src/scanner.js
In the server's implementation (`src/slopsquat.js:133`): Reading private keys / cloud credentials, or serializing the whole environment, is a sensitive-data source that becomes exfiltration when combined with any egress. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.
Evidence: . If internal, configure .npmrc scopes. If from an AI suggestion, remove it.`, owasp: 'A08:2025 Software and D
Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.
Location: server src/slopsquat.js
Tool "guard_action" appears to run shell commands or evaluate code (parameter "command"). Arbitrary execution driven by model input is one of the most dangerous MCP capabilities; combined with any untrusted input it becomes RCE.
Fix: Sandbox execution, allowlist commands/arguments, and never pass model output to a shell unescaped.
Location: tool guard_action
Tool "check_command" appears to run shell commands or evaluate code (parameter "command"). Arbitrary execution driven by model input is one of the most dangerous MCP capabilities; combined with any untrusted input it becomes RCE.
Fix: Sandbox execution, allowlist commands/arguments, and never pass model output to a shell unescaped.
Location: tool check_command
Tool "agent_guard" appears to run shell commands or evaluate code (parameter "command"). Arbitrary execution driven by model input is one of the most dangerous MCP capabilities; combined with any untrusted input it becomes RCE.
Fix: Sandbox execution, allowlist commands/arguments, and never pass model output to a shell unescaped.
Location: tool agent_guard
Tool "sandbox_exec" appears to run shell commands or evaluate code (keyword "exec" in tool name). Arbitrary execution driven by model input is one of the most dangerous MCP capabilities; combined with any untrusted input it becomes RCE.
Fix: Sandbox execution, allowlist commands/arguments, and never pass model output to a shell unescaped.
Location: tool sandbox_exec
In the server's implementation (`bin/cli.js:1194`): Evaluating strings as code is the most direct RCE primitive; if any tool input reaches it, the server executes attacker-chosen code. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.
Evidence: variables - Never use eval() or new Function() with user input - Never concatenate SQL strings — use parameterized qu
Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.
Location: server bin/cli.js
In the server's implementation (`src/ast.js:149`): Evaluating strings as code is the most direct RCE primitive; if any tool input reaches it, the server executes attacker-chosen code. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.
Evidence: ecution.', fix: 'Remove eval(). Use JSON.parse or an explicit dispatch table.', snippet: 'eval(...)' }); } i
Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.
Location: server src/ast.js
In the server's implementation (`src/policy-gen.js:283`): Evaluating strings as code is the most direct RCE primitive; if any tool input reaches it, the server executes attacker-chosen code. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.
Evidence: 'unsafe-eval' — remove eval() usage" : null, ].filter(Boolean), }; } module.exports = { generatePrivacyPolicy, g
Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.
Location: server src/policy-gen.js
In the server's implementation (`src/rules-pack.js:750`): Evaluating strings as code is the most direct RCE primitive; if any tool input reaches it, the server executes attacker-chosen code. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.
Evidence: cy allows unsafe-eval — eval() and new Function() can be used for XSS.', fix: 'Remove unsafe-eval; refactor any code
Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.
Location: server src/rules-pack.js
In the server's implementation (`src/rules.js:334`): Evaluating strings as code is the most direct RCE primitive; if any tool input reaches it, the server executes attacker-chosen code. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.
Evidence: ipInString: true, // an eval() inside a quoted string is text, not a call message: 'eval() executes arbitrary code
Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.
Location: server src/rules.js
In the server's implementation (`src/secure-prompt.js:24`): Evaluating strings as code is the most direct RCE primitive; if any tool input reaches it, the server executes attacker-chosen code. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.
Evidence: , msg: 'Prompt requests eval() — code injection risk' }, { re: /new\s+Function\s*\(/i, risk: 'high', msg: 'Prompt requ
Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.
Location: server src/secure-prompt.js
In the server's implementation (`src/taint-ast.js:90`): Evaluating strings as code is the most direct RCE primitive; if any tool input reaches it, the server executes attacker-chosen code. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.
Evidence: le: 'User input reaches eval()/Function() (dataflow-confirmed)', message: 'A value derived from user input flows int
Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.
Location: server src/taint-ast.js
In the server's implementation (`src/taint.js:53`): Evaluating strings as code is the most direct RCE primitive; if any tool input reaches it, the server executes attacker-chosen code. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.
Evidence: le: 'User input reaches eval()/Function() (dataflow-confirmed)', message: 'A value derived from user input flows int
Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.
Location: server src/taint.js
In the server's implementation (`bin/cli.js:1207`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.
Evidence: ever pass user input to exec() or spawn() without sanitization - For AI agents: add maxSteps, sandbox file access, allo
Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.
Location: server bin/cli.js
In the server's implementation (`src/auto.js:17`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.
Evidence: , execSync } = require('child_process'); const STATE_DIR = '.vibeguard'; const STATE_FILE = path.join(STATE_DIR, 'auto.
Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.
Location: server src/auto.js
In the server's implementation (`src/daemon.js:29`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.
Evidence: , execSync } = require('child_process'); const DAEMON_FILE = '.vibeguard-daemon.json'; const DAEMON_LOG = '.vibeguard-d
Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.
Location: server src/daemon.js
In the server's implementation (`src/deps.js:14`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.
Evidence: , execSync } = require('child_process'); const AUDIT_TIMEOUT_MS = 60000; // npm severity -> VibeGuard severity. npm us
Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.
Location: server src/deps.js
In the server's implementation (`src/engine.js:162`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.
Evidence: e: /exec\s*\(/g, name: 'exec()', type: 'code' }, { re: /open\s*\(/g, name: 'open()', type: 'file' }, { re: /pickle
Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.
Location: server src/engine.js
In the server's implementation (`src/external.js:16`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.
Evidence: , execSync } = require('child_process'); const isWin = process.platform === 'win32'; const TIMEOUT_MS = 180000; functi
Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.
Location: server src/external.js
In the server's implementation (`src/guard.js:28`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.
Evidence: { execSync } = require('child_process'); const { checkCommand } = require('./shell-guard'); const originalExecSync =
Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.
Location: server src/guard.js
In the server's implementation (`src/history.js:13`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.
Evidence: ecFileSync } = require('child_process'); const { secretRules, matchAll } = require('./rules'); const isWin = process.pl
Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.
Location: server src/history.js
In the server's implementation (`src/interceptor.js:280`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.
Evidence: ile, spawn } = require('child_process'); if (exec) { interceptors.exec = exec; require('child_process').exec =
Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.
Location: server src/interceptor.js
In the server's implementation (`src/mcp-server.js:516`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.
Evidence: process.env, no fs, no child_process, no network. Time-limited and memory-limited. Full audit log of every operation at
Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.
Location: server src/mcp-server.js
In the server's implementation (`src/daemon.js:117`): A shell/process command assembled from concatenated or interpolated values is command injection when any part is attacker-influenced — the OWASP canonical RCE flow. Verify what reaches the interpolated value. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.
Evidence: const gitResult = execSync(`git show HEAD:"${relPath}" 2>NUL`, { cwd: rootDir,
Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.
Location: server src/daemon.js
In the server's implementation (`src/mcp-server.js:889`): A shell/process command assembled from concatenated or interpolated values is command injection when any part is attacker-influenced — the OWASP canonical RCE flow. Verify what reaches the interpolated value. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.
Evidence: s; try { diffFiles = execSync(`git diff ${base} --name-only`, { cwd: dir, encoding: 'utf8' }).trim().split('\n').filt
Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.
Location: server src/mcp-server.js
Tool "guard_action" takes a command-shaped parameter "command" with no enum/pattern constraint. Free-form, model- or attacker-controlled arguments reaching a shell is the command-injection precondition.
Fix: Constrain the parameter (enum/pattern), or build the command from a fixed template with escaped args.
Location: tool guard_action · inputSchema.properties.command
Tool "check_command" takes a command-shaped parameter "command" with no enum/pattern constraint. Free-form, model- or attacker-controlled arguments reaching a shell is the command-injection precondition.
Fix: Constrain the parameter (enum/pattern), or build the command from a fixed template with escaped args.
Location: tool check_command · inputSchema.properties.command
Tool "agent_guard" takes a command-shaped parameter "command" with no enum/pattern constraint. Free-form, model- or attacker-controlled arguments reaching a shell is the command-injection precondition.
Fix: Constrain the parameter (enum/pattern), or build the command from a fixed template with escaped args.
Location: tool agent_guard · inputSchema.properties.command
Tool "sandbox_exec" takes a command-shaped parameter "code" with no enum/pattern constraint. Free-form, model- or attacker-controlled arguments reaching a shell is the command-injection precondition.
Fix: Constrain the parameter (enum/pattern), or build the command from a fixed template with escaped args.
Location: tool sandbox_exec · inputSchema.properties.code
In the server's implementation (`src/plugin.js:80`): Loading a module chosen at runtime (from a variable) can pull in and run attacker-influenced code paths. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.
Evidence: try { mod = require(name); } catch { // Try resolving from the root directory co
Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.
Location: server src/plugin.js
Tool "guard_action" can mutate/egress but declares no destructiveHint. Clients that don't default to spec-safe behavior may not prompt before running it.
Fix: Declare accurate annotations, and gate destructive tools on user confirmation regardless.
Location: tool guard_action
Tool "check_command" can mutate/egress but declares no destructiveHint. Clients that don't default to spec-safe behavior may not prompt before running it.
Fix: Declare accurate annotations, and gate destructive tools on user confirmation regardless.
Location: tool check_command
Tool "agent_guard" can mutate/egress but declares no destructiveHint. Clients that don't default to spec-safe behavior may not prompt before running it.
Fix: Declare accurate annotations, and gate destructive tools on user confirmation regardless.
Location: tool agent_guard
Tool "sandbox_exec" can mutate/egress but declares no destructiveHint. Clients that don't default to spec-safe behavior may not prompt before running it.
Fix: Declare accurate annotations, and gate destructive tools on user confirmation regardless.
Location: tool sandbox_exec
Shell command embedded in tool metadata detected in the description of tool "check_command". Instruction-like content in tool metadata is executed by the model, not the human, and is the primary tool-poisoning vector.
Evidence: rm -rf
Fix: Tool descriptions should describe behavior, not instruct the assistant. Treat imperative / secrecy / sequencing language in metadata as hostile.
Location: tool check_command · description
Shell command embedded in tool metadata detected in the description of tool "agent_guard". Instruction-like content in tool metadata is executed by the model, not the human, and is the primary tool-poisoning vector.
Evidence: rm -rf
Fix: Tool descriptions should describe behavior, not instruct the assistant. Treat imperative / secrecy / sequencing language in metadata as hostile.
Location: tool agent_guard · description
"@yagyeshvyas/vibeguard" executes postinstall script(s) at install time. An install hook runs at install time; most are routine build/setup, but review what it does before trusting it.
Evidence: node scripts/postinstall.js
Fix: Review the scripts; install with --ignore-scripts where possible and vet what they do.
Location: package @yagyeshvyas/vibeguard
Each tool and what it can reach — statically extracted from the published source.
agent_guardruns code / shellcheck_commandruns code / shellconfig_dumpreads sensitive dataguard_actionruns code / shellsandbox_execruns code / shellslack_notifynetwork egressagent_scanno sensitive capabilityai_data_guardno sensitive capabilityai_firewallno sensitive capabilityanalyze_cross_file_dataflowno sensitive capabilityanalyze_dataflowno sensitive capabilityaudit_configno sensitive capabilityaudit_logno sensitive capabilityauth_coverageno sensitive capabilitybaselineno sensitive capabilitybatch_fixno sensitive capabilitybehavior_analysisno sensitive capabilitycheck_codeno sensitive capabilitycheck_package_healthno sensitive capabilitycompliance_reportno sensitive capabilitycve_intelno sensitive capabilitydeep_scanno sensitive capabilitydep_firewallno sensitive capabilitydep_reachabilityno sensitive capabilitydependency_treeno sensitive capabilitydetect_piino sensitive capabilityenv_lockno sensitive capabilityexfil_checkno sensitive capabilityexplain_remediationno sensitive capabilityexport_sarifno sensitive capabilityfix_codeno sensitive capabilityfull_auditno sensitive capabilitygenerate_cspno sensitive capabilitygenerate_html_reportno sensitive capabilitygenerate_policyno sensitive capabilitygenerate_privacy_policyno sensitive capabilitygenerate_sbomno sensitive capabilityguardvibe_doctorno sensitive capabilityignore_ruleno sensitive capabilityinteractive_dashboardno sensitive capabilitylicense_complianceno sensitive capabilitylist_rulesno sensitive capabilitymcp_auditno sensitive capabilitynetwork_auditno sensitive capabilityoutput_guardno sensitive capabilitypr_commentno sensitive capabilitypre_deployno sensitive capabilitypreset_applyno sensitive capabilityprivacy_auditno sensitive capabilityredact_piino sensitive capabilityremediation_planno sensitive capabilityrepo_security_postureno sensitive capabilityreview_hotspotsno sensitive capabilityreview_prno sensitive capabilityrisk_scoreno sensitive capabilityrule_infono sensitive capabilityscan_changed_filesno sensitive capabilityscan_config_changeno sensitive capabilityscan_container_imageno sensitive capabilityscan_dependenciesno sensitive capabilityscan_fileno sensitive capabilityscan_hallucinated_packagesno sensitive capabilityscan_projectno sensitive capabilityscan_secretsno sensitive capabilityscan_secrets_historyno sensitive capabilityscan_stagedno sensitive capabilityscan_urlno sensitive capabilitysecure_promptno sensitive capabilitysecure_thisno sensitive capabilitysecurity_scorecardno sensitive capabilitysecurity_statsno sensitive capabilityself_checkno sensitive capabilityseverity_matrixno sensitive capabilitysuggest_fixesno sensitive capabilitysupply_chain_auditno sensitive capabilitytamper_checkno sensitive capabilitythreat_modelno sensitive capabilitytrace_promptno sensitive capabilitytrend_reportno sensitive capabilityvault_manageno sensitive capabilityverify_fixesno sensitive capabilityverify_remediationno sensitive capabilityCross-tool combinations that form a data-exfiltration primitive (untrusted input → sensitive source → external sink).
Scan history per published version. The engine is deterministic — the same version always yields the same score, so a changed score means the package itself changed.
| Version | Score | Findings | Engine | Scanned |
|---|---|---|---|---|
v1.3.0 latest |
B 81/100 | 42 | 1.13.0 | 2026-09-07 |
Show this server's live Trust Score in your README, docs or website. The badge is served straight from the registry and updates automatically after every rescan — no API key needed. It links back to this page, so anyone who sees the grade can also read the findings behind it instead of taking a number on faith.
The score above is reproducible: the same package version always yields the same result. Run it locally or over the free API — no account, no LLM, fully deterministic.
npx mcptrustchecker scan @yagyeshvyas/vibeguard --online
Independent packages implementing the same tool, scanned with the same engine. Compare all 2 side by side →
Hotel booking MCP server — 300K+ properties, real confirmation numbers, loyalty programs. Builders monetize every booking via Stripe Connect. The first MCP server that completes real hotel reservations inside AI conversations.
Manage AdGuard Home through AI assistants
Read-only Azure DevOps for MCP clients using only your existing browser session — no PAT, no Azure CLI. Browse work items, pull requests, comments, attachments and Artifacts feeds across every project, repo and feed you can access.
MCP server for Adobe Experience Manager Assets integration development
Servidor MCP para el tiempo oficial de España (API pública OpenData de AEMET). Predicción, observación y avisos como herramientas MCP tipadas.
A standalone MCP stdio bridge for Affinity by Canva's local MCP SSE server.