world-model-mcp
PyPI
v0.15.4
Published by an unidentified publisher — no publish provenance and no public repository, so the publisher could not be verified and the source cannot be independently located.
The grade answers one question — how safe is this server for you to adopt — so it is computed in two auditable stages. Nothing below is an opinion or an LLM's guess; every line is a real term the deterministic engine applied, and the same input always yields the same number.
1. Threat score — 100 − 0 = 100. What the published surface and source actually contain:
The deterministic scan raised no scored threat in the surface it inspected — the threat score stayed at 100. Capability observations and advisory notes are recorded but never lower it.
2. Client adoption risk — 100 − 8 = 92. Three small, subtract-only factors that reflect your risk in adopting it — a clean scan proves less on a powerful, unverified or barely-inspectable package, so the grade says so plainly:
| Points | Adoption-risk factor |
|---|---|
| −6 | capability blast radius (high) — client exposure if the model is manipulated |
| −2 | publisher verification (unlinked) — no provenance/repo link, but the shipped source was fully read |
Capability observations and info notes are shown under Findings but never scored.
Open any row's finding below for the file, line and evidence behind a deduction.
In the server's implementation (`adapters/pi/index.ts:22`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.
Evidence: rt { spawn } from "node:child_process"; import { mkdirSync } from "node:fs"; import { homedir } from "node:os"; import {
Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.
Location: server adapters/pi/index.ts
In the server's implementation (`hooks/src/world-model-inject.ts:11`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.
Evidence: import { spawn } from 'child_process'; type EventName = 'PostCompact' | 'UserPromptSubmit' | 'SessionStart'; interfac
Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.
Location: server hooks/src/world-model-inject.ts
In a packaging/dev/install script (shipped, but not the server runtime) (`benchmarks/repeat-mistake/agent_runner.py:184`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.
Evidence: try: proc = subprocess.run( cmd, cwd=str(checkout.repo_dir),
Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.
Location: server benchmarks/repeat-mistake/agent_runner.py
In a packaging/dev/install script (shipped, but not the server runtime) (`benchmarks/repeat-mistake/claude_client.py:86`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.
Evidence: proc = subprocess.run( [self.binary, "-p", "--output-format", "text"],
Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.
Location: server benchmarks/repeat-mistake/claude_client.py
In a packaging/dev/install script (shipped, but not the server runtime) (`benchmarks/repeat-mistake/clone_repo.py:39`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.
Evidence: stderr).""" proc = subprocess.run( cmd, cwd=cwd, capture_output=True, text=True,
Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.
Location: server benchmarks/repeat-mistake/clone_repo.py
In a packaging/dev/install script (shipped, but not the server runtime) (`benchmarks/repeat-mistake/score.py:56`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.
Evidence: join(cmd)}") proc = subprocess.run(cmd, env=os.environ.copy()) return proc.returncode def collect_results(
Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.
Location: server benchmarks/repeat-mistake/score.py
In a packaging/dev/install script (shipped, but not the server runtime) (`examples/managed-agents-self-hosted/deploy_modal.py:54`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.
Evidence: Modal immediately. subprocess.Popen(["python", "-m", "world_model_server.server"])
Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.
Location: server examples/managed-agents-self-hosted/deploy_modal.py
In a packaging/dev/install script (shipped, but not the server runtime) (`scripts/engagement_tracker.py:78`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.
Evidence: d JSON.""" result = subprocess.run( ["gh", "api", path], capture_output=True, text=True, timeout=15,
Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.
Location: server scripts/engagement_tracker.py
In a packaging/dev/install script (shipped, but not the server runtime) (`tests/integration/test_buzz_acp_handshake.py:195`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.
Evidence: oot, }) proc = subprocess.Popen( [buzz_agent], stdin=subprocess.PIPE, stdout=subprocess
Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.
Location: server tests/integration/test_buzz_acp_handshake.py
In a packaging/dev/install script (shipped, but not the server runtime) (`tests/test_etch_verify_subprocess_e2e.py:80`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.
Evidence: nts. """ return subprocess.run( [sys.executable, "-m", "world_model_server.etch_verify", *args],
Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.
Location: server tests/test_etch_verify_subprocess_e2e.py
Each tool and what it can reach — statically extracted from the published source.
export_claude_mdno sensitive capabilityfind_contradictionsno sensitive capabilityget_agents_md_constraintsno sensitive capabilityget_audit_log_headno sensitive capabilityget_co_edit_suggestionsno sensitive capabilityget_compaction_auditno sensitive capabilityget_constraintsno sensitive capabilityget_context_for_actionno sensitive capabilityget_decision_logno sensitive capabilityget_health_reportno sensitive capabilityget_injection_contextno sensitive capabilityget_related_bugsno sensitive capabilityingest_pr_reviewsno sensitive capabilitypin_annotationno sensitive capabilitypredict_regressionno sensitive capabilitypredict_test_failuresno sensitive capabilitypromote_constraintno sensitive capabilityprove_entry_inclusionno sensitive capabilityquery_factno sensitive capabilityrecall_transcript_rangeno sensitive capabilityrecord_compaction_auditno sensitive capabilityrecord_correctionno sensitive capabilityrecord_decisionno sensitive capabilityrecord_eventno sensitive capabilityrecord_test_outcomeno sensitive capabilityresolve_contradictionno sensitive capabilitysearch_globalno sensitive capabilityseed_projectno sensitive capabilitysimulate_changeno sensitive capabilityvalidate_changeno sensitive capabilityverify_retrievalno sensitive capabilityScan history per published version. The engine is deterministic — the same version always yields the same score, so a changed score means the package itself changed.
| Version | Score | Findings | Engine | Scanned |
|---|---|---|---|---|
v0.15.4 latest |
A 92/100 | 10 | 1.9.0 | 2026-07-24 |
v0.15.1 |
A 92/100 | 10 | 1.9.0 | 2026-07-23 |
Show this server's live Trust Score in your README, docs or website. The badge is served straight from the registry and updates automatically after every rescan — no API key needed. It links back to this page, so anyone who sees the grade can also read the findings behind it instead of taking a number on faith.
The score above is reproducible: the same package version always yields the same result. Run it locally or over the free API — no account, no LLM, fully deterministic.
npx mcptrustchecker scan world-model-mcp --online --registry pypi
Security scan results for the 2sio MCP server.
ArXiv preprints + Google Scholar papers, with citation counts in one query.
Security scan results for the Add MCP server.
Security scan results for the Ai Archive MCP server.
Security scan results for the Aira Semanticscholar MCP server.
Korean premium short-term rental search: natural language or structured filters (SHV engine).