Workspaces Euc MCP Server

workspaces-euc-mcp-server PyPI v0.1.23

Published by bengroeneveldsg — no publish provenance and no vendor-owned scope, so the publisher could not be verified. The repository link below is self-declared.

Trust grade
A
98/100
Last scanned
Trust
A · 98/100
Adoption risk for you: the threat score, then adjusted down for blast radius, publisher verification and how much the scan could see. Deterministic; every point is auditable.
Capability
High
Blast radius if it went rogue — what the server’s tools could reach. Independent of trust.
Coverage
Source
How much the scan could actually inspect. Shallow coverage is stated, never hidden.
A Why this grade threat 97.9 = 98/100

The grade answers one question — how safe is this server for you to adopt — so it is computed in two auditable stages. Nothing below is an opinion or an LLM's guess; every line is a real term the deterministic engine applied, and the same input always yields the same number.

1. Threat score — 100 − 2.1 = 97.9. What the published surface and source actually contain:

PointsWhat was foundCategory
−2.1 Package has no source repository MTC-SUP-011 supply-chain

2. Client adoption risk — 97.9 − your exposure = 98. Three small, subtract-only factors that reflect your risk in adopting it — a clean scan proves less on a powerful, unverified or barely-inspectable package, so the grade says so plainly:

Capability observations and info notes are shown under Findings but never scored. Open any row's finding below for the file, line and evidence behind a deduction.

Findings 2

high Shell/command execution in server code (workspaces_euc_mcp_server/sso.py)MTC-SRC-002

In the server's implementation (`workspaces_euc_mcp_server/sso.py:60`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: subprocess.Popen(

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server workspaces_euc_mcp_server/sso.py

low Package has no source repositoryMTC-SUP-011

"workspaces-euc-mcp-server" declares no repository URL, so its published artifact cannot be compared against reviewable source.

Fix: Prefer packages that link to public, reviewable source.

Location: package workspaces-euc-mcp-server

What this scan could not see

Versions

Scan history per published version. The engine is deterministic — the same version always yields the same score, so a changed score means the package itself changed.

VersionScoreFindingsEngineScanned
v0.1.23 latest A 98/100 2 1.5.0 2026-07-23

Embed this score

Show this server's live Trust Score in your README, docs or website. The badge is served straight from the registry and updates automatically after every rescan — no API key needed. It links back to this page, so anyone who sees the grade can also read the findings behind it instead of taking a number on faith.

MCP Trust Score: A · 98/100
Markdown (GitHub README)
[![MCP Trust Score](https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/workspaces-euc-mcp-server/badge.svg)](https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/workspaces-euc-mcp-server)
HTML
<a href="https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/workspaces-euc-mcp-server"><img src="https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/workspaces-euc-mcp-server/badge.svg" alt="MCP Trust Score" height="20"></a>
Prefer shields.io styling? Point it at https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/workspaces-euc-mcp-server/badge.json via https://img.shields.io/endpoint?url=…

Verify this score yourself

The score above is reproducible: the same package version always yields the same result. Run it locally or over the free API — no account, no LLM, fully deterministic.

npx mcptrustchecker scan workspaces-euc-mcp-server --online --registry pypi

Use the free API → How scoring works

More in Business & CRM