Wikicitation MCP Server

wikicitation-mcp PyPI v0.3.1

Published by jsobel1 — no publish provenance, so origin is unverified, but the source is public: the repository link below is self-declared yet readable, so you can inspect the code before adopting it.

MCP server providing Wikipedia citation-science tools for Claude — pure Python, no R required

Trust grade
A
96/100
Last scanned get badge →
Trust
A · 96/100
Adoption risk for you: the threat score, then adjusted down for blast radius, publisher verification and how much the scan could see. Deterministic; every point is auditable.
Capability
Moderate
Blast radius if it went rogue — what the server’s tools could reach. Independent of trust.
Coverage
Source
How much the scan could actually inspect. Shallow coverage is stated, never hidden.
Share this Trust Score
𝕏 Share LinkedIn Reddit
A Why this grade threat 100 − adoption risk = 96/100

The grade answers one question — how safe is this server for you to adopt — so it is computed in two auditable stages. Nothing below is an opinion or an LLM's guess; every line is a real term the deterministic engine applied, and the same input always yields the same number.

1. Threat score — 100 − 0 = 100. What the published surface and source actually contain:

The deterministic scan raised no scored threat in the surface it inspected — the threat score stayed at 100. Capability observations and advisory notes are recorded but never lower it.

2. Client adoption risk — 100 − 4 = 96. Three small, subtract-only factors that reflect your risk in adopting it — a clean scan proves less on a powerful, unverified or barely-inspectable package, so the grade says so plainly:

PointsAdoption-risk factor
−3 capability blast radius (moderate) — client exposure if the model is manipulated
−1 publisher verification (public source) — no provenance, but the source is public and inspectable

Capability observations and info notes are shown under Findings but never scored. Open any row's finding below for the file, line and evidence behind a deduction.

Findings 1

low Shell/command execution in packaging/dev tooling (tests/test_bridge.py)MTC-SRC-002

In a packaging/dev/install script (shipped, but not the server runtime) (`tests/test_bridge.py:35`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: turn False result = subprocess.run( ["Rscript", "-e", "suppressPackageStartupMessages(library(wikil

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server tests/test_bridge.py

Tools 40

Each tool and what it can reach — statically extracted from the published source.

  • get_page_in_cat_multipleingests untrusted input
  • get_pages_in_cat_tableingests untrusted input
  • parse_citationsingests untrusted input
  • annotate_dois_altmetricno sensitive capability
  • annotate_dois_bibtexno sensitive capability
  • annotate_dois_crossrefno sensitive capability
  • annotate_dois_europmcno sensitive capability
  • annotate_isbn_googleno sensitive capability
  • annotate_isbn_openlibno sensitive capability
  • annotate_isbns_altmetricno sensitive capability
Show 30 more tools ↓
  • extract_all_regexno sensitive capability
  • extract_citationsno sensitive capability
  • extract_wikihypelinksno sensitive capability
  • extract_with_regexno sensitive capability
  • get_any_countno sensitive capability
  • get_article_historyno sensitive capability
  • get_article_infono sensitive capability
  • get_article_initialno sensitive capability
  • get_article_recentno sensitive capability
  • get_category_creationno sensitive capability
  • get_category_historyno sensitive capability
  • get_category_pagesno sensitive capability
  • get_category_recentno sensitive capability
  • get_citation_typesno sensitive capability
  • get_doi_countno sensitive capability
  • get_hyperlink_countno sensitive capability
  • get_isbn_countno sensitive capability
  • get_ref_countno sensitive capability
  • get_revert_countsno sensitive capability
  • get_sci_scoreno sensitive capability
  • get_source_type_countsno sensitive capability
  • get_subcat_multipleno sensitive capability
  • get_subcat_tableno sensitive capability
  • get_subcat_with_depthno sensitive capability
  • get_tables_allno sensitive capability
  • get_top_cited_papersno sensitive capability
  • get_url_countno sensitive capability
  • parse_all_citationsno sensitive capability
  • parse_cite_typeno sensitive capability
  • replace_wikihypelinksno sensitive capability

What this scan could not see

Versions 1

Scan history per published version. The engine is deterministic — the same version always yields the same score, so a changed score means the package itself changed.

VersionScoreFindingsEngineScanned
v0.3.1 latest A 96/100 1 1.13.0 2026-08-25

Embed this score

Show this server's live Trust Score in your README, docs or website. The badge is served straight from the registry and updates automatically after every rescan — no API key needed. It links back to this page, so anyone who sees the grade can also read the findings behind it instead of taking a number on faith.

MCP Trust Score: A · 96/100
Markdown (GitHub README)
[![MCP Trust Score](https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/wikicitation-mcp/badge.svg)](https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/wikicitation-mcp)
HTML
<a href="https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/wikicitation-mcp"><img src="https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/wikicitation-mcp/badge.svg" alt="MCP Trust Score" height="20"></a>
Prefer shields.io styling? Point it at https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/wikicitation-mcp/badge.json via https://img.shields.io/endpoint?url=…

Verify this score yourself

The score above is reproducible: the same package version always yields the same result. Run it locally or over the free API — no account, no LLM, fully deterministic.

npx mcptrustchecker scan wikicitation-mcp --online --registry pypi

Use the free API → How scoring works

More in Web, Search & Scraping