Webflow (npm) MCP Server

webflow-mcp npm v0.4.0

Published by an unidentified publisher — no publish provenance and no public repository, so the publisher could not be verified and the source cannot be independently located.

WebFlow MCP MVP with local flow workspaces and MCP tool exposure

Trust grade
A
92/100
Last scanned get badge →
Trust
A · 92/100
Adoption risk for you: the threat score, then adjusted down for blast radius, publisher verification and how much the scan could see. Deterministic; every point is auditable.
Capability
High
Blast radius if it went rogue — what the server’s tools could reach. Independent of trust.
Coverage
Source
How much the scan could actually inspect. Shallow coverage is stated, never hidden.
Share this Trust Score
𝕏 Share LinkedIn Reddit
A Why this grade threat 100 − adoption risk = 92/100

The grade answers one question — how safe is this server for you to adopt — so it is computed in two auditable stages. Nothing below is an opinion or an LLM's guess; every line is a real term the deterministic engine applied, and the same input always yields the same number.

1. Threat score — 100 − 0 = 100. What the published surface and source actually contain:

The deterministic scan raised no scored threat in the surface it inspected — the threat score stayed at 100. Capability observations and advisory notes are recorded but never lower it.

2. Client adoption risk — 100 − 8 = 92. Three small, subtract-only factors that reflect your risk in adopting it — a clean scan proves less on a powerful, unverified or barely-inspectable package, so the grade says so plainly:

PointsAdoption-risk factor
−6 capability blast radius (high) — client exposure if the model is manipulated
−2 publisher verification (unlinked) — no provenance/repo link, but the shipped source was fully read

Capability observations and info notes are shown under Findings but never scored. Open any row's finding below for the file, line and evidence behind a deduction.

Findings 4

high Shell/command execution in server code (dist/src/cli/commands/login.js)MTC-SRC-002

In the server's implementation (`dist/src/cli/commands/login.js:2`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: rt { spawn } from 'node:child_process'; import { hostname } from 'node:os'; import { assertSecureRelayUrl, clearCredenti

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server dist/src/cli/commands/login.js

high Shell/command execution in server code (dist/src/runner/cdp-session.js)MTC-SRC-002

In the server's implementation (`dist/src/runner/cdp-session.js:2`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: rt { spawn } from 'node:child_process'; import { get as httpGet } from 'node:http'; import { chromium } from 'playwright

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server dist/src/runner/cdp-session.js

high Shell/command execution in server code (dist/src/runner/chrome.js)MTC-SRC-002

In the server's implementation (`dist/src/runner/chrome.js:3`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: rt { spawn } from 'node:child_process'; /** * Locate a real Google Chrome executable. The user can always override with

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server dist/src/runner/chrome.js

high Shell/command execution in server code (dist/src/worker/lifecycle.js)MTC-SRC-002

In the server's implementation (`dist/src/worker/lifecycle.js:3`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: rt { spawn } from 'node:child_process'; import { loadCredentials } from '../shared/credentials.js'; import { ensureDir,

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server dist/src/worker/lifecycle.js

Tools 27

Each tool and what it can reach — statically extracted from the published source.

  • browse_catalogingests untrusted input
  • add_to_repertoireno sensitive capability
  • approve_flow_updateno sensitive capability
  • cancel_flow_runno sensitive capability
  • check_profile_statusno sensitive capability
  • describe_flowno sensitive capability
  • get_configno sensitive capability
  • get_flow_run_resultno sensitive capability
  • get_flow_run_statusno sensitive capability
  • list_flow_approvalsno sensitive capability
Show 17 more tools ↓
  • list_profilesno sensitive capability
  • list_recent_flow_runsno sensitive capability
  • logoutno sensitive capability
  • refresh_profile_instanceno sensitive capability
  • remove_from_repertoireno sensitive capability
  • reset_profileno sensitive capability
  • revoke_flow_approvalno sensitive capability
  • run_flow_onceno sensitive capability
  • run_flow_with_optionsno sensitive capability
  • search_flowsno sensitive capability
  • set_browser_modeno sensitive capability
  • set_browser_visibilityno sensitive capability
  • start_flow_runno sensitive capability
  • start_profile_loginno sensitive capability
  • start_workerno sensitive capability
  • stop_workerno sensitive capability
  • worker_statusno sensitive capability

What this scan could not see

Versions 1

Scan history per published version. The engine is deterministic — the same version always yields the same score, so a changed score means the package itself changed.

VersionScoreFindingsEngineScanned
v0.4.0 latest A 92/100 4 1.13.0 2026-09-06

Embed this score

Show this server's live Trust Score in your README, docs or website. The badge is served straight from the registry and updates automatically after every rescan — no API key needed. It links back to this page, so anyone who sees the grade can also read the findings behind it instead of taking a number on faith.

MCP Trust Score: A · 92/100
Markdown (GitHub README)
[![MCP Trust Score](https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/webflow-mcp/badge.svg)](https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/webflow-mcp)
HTML
<a href="https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/webflow-mcp"><img src="https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/webflow-mcp/badge.svg" alt="MCP Trust Score" height="20"></a>
Prefer shields.io styling? Point it at https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/webflow-mcp/badge.json via https://img.shields.io/endpoint?url=…

Verify this score yourself

The score above is reproducible: the same package version always yields the same result. Run it locally or over the free API — no account, no LLM, fully deterministic.

npx mcptrustchecker scan webflow-mcp --online

Use the free API → How scoring works

Other implementations of Webflow 3

Independent packages implementing the same tool, scanned with the same engine. Compare all 4 side by side →

More in Content Management