Wave (Tencent) MCP Server

wave-mcp PyPI v0.2.3

Published by tencent — no publish provenance, so origin is unverified, but the source is public: the repository link below is self-declared yet readable, so you can inspect the code before adopting it.

Open-source, license-free MCP server for RTL waveform debug (name-reservation placeholder; full release coming soon).

Trust grade
A
93/100
Last scanned get badge →
Trust
A · 93/100
Adoption risk for you: the threat score, then adjusted down for blast radius, publisher verification and how much the scan could see. Deterministic; every point is auditable.
Capability
High
Blast radius if it went rogue — what the server’s tools could reach. Independent of trust.
Coverage
Source
How much the scan could actually inspect. Shallow coverage is stated, never hidden.
Share this Trust Score
𝕏 Share LinkedIn Reddit
A Why this grade threat 100 − adoption risk = 93/100

The grade answers one question — how safe is this server for you to adopt — so it is computed in two auditable stages. Nothing below is an opinion or an LLM's guess; every line is a real term the deterministic engine applied, and the same input always yields the same number.

1. Threat score — 100 − 0 = 100. What the published surface and source actually contain:

The deterministic scan raised no scored threat in the surface it inspected — the threat score stayed at 100. Capability observations and advisory notes are recorded but never lower it.

2. Client adoption risk — 100 − 7 = 93. Three small, subtract-only factors that reflect your risk in adopting it — a clean scan proves less on a powerful, unverified or barely-inspectable package, so the grade says so plainly:

PointsAdoption-risk factor
−6 capability blast radius (high) — client exposure if the model is manipulated
−1 publisher verification (public source) — no provenance, but the source is public and inspectable

Capability observations and info notes are shown under Findings but never scored. Open any row's finding below for the file, line and evidence behind a deduction.

Findings 3

high Shell/command execution in server code (wave_mcp/convert.py)MTC-SRC-002

In the server's implementation (`wave_mcp/convert.py:161`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: \n1!\n") proc = subprocess.run([VCD2FST_BIN, "-F", "-p", "-v", vcd, "-f", fst], ca

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server wave_mcp/convert.py

high Shell/command execution in server code (wave_mcp/viewer/__init__.py)MTC-SRC-002

In the server's implementation (`wave_mcp/viewer/__init__.py:215`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: rocess try: subprocess.Popen([opener, url], stdout=subprocess.DEVNULL, stderr=subpr

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server wave_mcp/viewer/__init__.py

high Shell/command execution in server code (wave_mcp/viewer/surver.py)MTC-SRC-002

In the server's implementation (`wave_mcp/viewer/surver.py:78`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: proc = subprocess.Popen( [binary, "--port", str(port), "--bind-address", "127.0.0.1

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server wave_mcp/viewer/surver.py

Tools 34

Each tool and what it can reach — statically extracted from the published source.

  • list_filesreads sensitive data
  • active_driversno sensitive capability
  • close_sessionno sensitive capability
  • close_wave_viewno sensitive capability
  • convert_fsdb_to_fstno sensitive capability
  • convert_vcd_to_fstno sensitive capability
  • diff_waveformsno sensitive capability
  • driver_contributorsno sensitive capability
  • find_filesno sensitive capability
  • get_view_stateno sensitive capability
Show 24 more tools ↓
  • instances_of_moduleno sensitive capability
  • instances_of_module_matchingno sensitive capability
  • list_child_instancesno sensitive capability
  • list_modulesno sensitive capability
  • list_signalsno sensitive capability
  • list_wave_viewsno sensitive capability
  • modules_in_fileno sensitive capability
  • open_sessionno sensitive capability
  • open_static_sessionno sensitive capability
  • open_wave_viewno sensitive capability
  • prepare_sessionno sensitive capability
  • scope_infono sensitive capability
  • session_infono sensitive capability
  • signal_connectivityno sensitive capability
  • signal_driversno sensitive capability
  • signal_faninno sensitive capability
  • signal_infono sensitive capability
  • signal_loadsno sensitive capability
  • signal_value_atno sensitive capability
  • signal_valuesno sensitive capability
  • signal_values_in_rangeno sensitive capability
  • trace_valueno sensitive capability
  • trace_xno sensitive capability
  • update_wave_viewno sensitive capability

What this scan could not see

Versions 5

Scan history per published version. The engine is deterministic — the same version always yields the same score, so a changed score means the package itself changed.

VersionScoreFindingsEngineScanned
v0.2.3 latest A 93/100 3 1.13.0 2026-09-06
v0.2.1 A 93/100 3 1.13.0 2026-09-05
v0.2.0 A 93/100 3 1.13.0 2026-09-04
v0.1.1 A 93/100 1 1.13.0 2026-08-27
v0.0.1 A 91/100 0 1.13.0 2026-08-25

Embed this score

Show this server's live Trust Score in your README, docs or website. The badge is served straight from the registry and updates automatically after every rescan — no API key needed. It links back to this page, so anyone who sees the grade can also read the findings behind it instead of taking a number on faith.

MCP Trust Score: A · 93/100
Markdown (GitHub README)
[![MCP Trust Score](https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/wave-mcp-2/badge.svg)](https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/wave-mcp-2)
HTML
<a href="https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/wave-mcp-2"><img src="https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/wave-mcp-2/badge.svg" alt="MCP Trust Score" height="20"></a>
Prefer shields.io styling? Point it at https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/wave-mcp-2/badge.json via https://img.shields.io/endpoint?url=…

Verify this score yourself

The score above is reproducible: the same package version always yields the same result. Run it locally or over the free API — no account, no LLM, fully deterministic.

npx mcptrustchecker scan wave-mcp --online --registry pypi

Use the free API → How scoring works

Other implementations of Wave 2

Independent packages implementing the same tool, scanned with the same engine. Compare all 3 side by side →

More in Learning & Documentation