Utract MCP Server
utract-mcp
PyPI
v0.1.0
Published by danangharissetiawan — no publish provenance, so origin is unverified, but the source is public: the repository link below is self-declared yet readable, so you can inspect the code before adopting it.
The grade answers one question — how safe is this server for you to adopt — so it is computed in two auditable stages. Nothing below is an opinion or an LLM's guess; every line is a real term the deterministic engine applied, and the same input always yields the same number.
1. Threat score — 100 − 0 = 100. What the published surface and source actually contain:
The deterministic scan raised no scored threat in the surface it inspected — the threat score stayed at 100. Capability observations and advisory notes are recorded but never lower it.
2. Client adoption risk — 100 − 4 = 96. Three small, subtract-only factors that reflect your risk in adopting it — a clean scan proves less on a powerful, unverified or barely-inspectable package, so the grade says so plainly:
| Points | Adoption-risk factor |
|---|---|
| −3 | capability blast radius (moderate) — client exposure if the model is manipulated |
| −1 | publisher verification (public source) — no provenance, but the source is public and inspectable |
Capability observations and info notes are shown under Findings but never scored.
Open any row's finding below for the file, line and evidence behind a deduction.
Findings 0
Tools 45
Each tool and what it can reach — statically extracted from the published source.
plane_create_issuenetwork egressplane_create_issue_commentnetwork egressplane_add_issues_to_cycleno sensitive capabilityplane_add_issues_to_moduleno sensitive capabilityplane_archive_projectno sensitive capabilityplane_create_cycleno sensitive capabilityplane_create_labelno sensitive capabilityplane_create_moduleno sensitive capabilityplane_create_projectno sensitive capabilityplane_create_stateno sensitive capability
Show 35 more tools ↓
plane_delete_cycleno sensitive capabilityplane_delete_issueno sensitive capabilityplane_delete_issue_commentno sensitive capabilityplane_delete_labelno sensitive capabilityplane_delete_moduleno sensitive capabilityplane_delete_stateno sensitive capabilityplane_get_cycleno sensitive capabilityplane_get_issueno sensitive capabilityplane_get_issue_by_sequenceno sensitive capabilityplane_get_labelno sensitive capabilityplane_get_moduleno sensitive capabilityplane_get_projectno sensitive capabilityplane_get_stateno sensitive capabilityplane_list_cycle_issuesno sensitive capabilityplane_list_cyclesno sensitive capabilityplane_list_issue_activityno sensitive capabilityplane_list_issue_commentsno sensitive capabilityplane_list_issuesno sensitive capabilityplane_list_labelsno sensitive capabilityplane_list_module_issuesno sensitive capabilityplane_list_modulesno sensitive capabilityplane_list_project_membersno sensitive capabilityplane_list_projectsno sensitive capabilityplane_list_statesno sensitive capabilityplane_list_workspace_membersno sensitive capabilityplane_remove_issue_from_cycleno sensitive capabilityplane_remove_issue_from_moduleno sensitive capabilityplane_search_issuesno sensitive capabilityplane_update_cycleno sensitive capabilityplane_update_issueno sensitive capabilityplane_update_issue_commentno sensitive capabilityplane_update_labelno sensitive capabilityplane_update_moduleno sensitive capabilityplane_update_projectno sensitive capabilityplane_update_stateno sensitive capability
What this scan could not see
- Tools were statically extracted from the published source (45 recovered), not enumerated from a running server. Tool-poisoning, Unicode-smuggling, capability and toxic-flow analysis ran on this inferred surface, but a mis-parsed registration could be missed or mis-attributed, so tool-derived findings are capped below “confirmed”. To grade the real runtime surface, scan the running server: --command "npx -y <package>".
Versions 1
Scan history per published version. The engine is deterministic — the same version always yields the same score, so a changed score means the package itself changed.
| Version | Score | Findings | Engine | Scanned |
|---|---|---|---|---|
v0.1.0 latest |
A 96/100 | 0 | 1.9.0 | 2026-07-23 |
Embed this score
Show this server's live Trust Score in your README, docs or website. The badge is served straight from the registry and updates automatically after every rescan — no API key needed. It links back to this page, so anyone who sees the grade can also read the findings behind it instead of taking a number on faith.
Verify this score yourself
The score above is reproducible: the same package version always yields the same result. Run it locally or over the free API — no account, no LLM, fully deterministic.
npx mcptrustchecker scan utract-mcp --online --registry pypiMore in Developer Tools
Security scan results for the 1stay MCP server.
Security scan results for the Adguard Home MCP server.
Security scan results for the Ado Browser MCP server.
Security scan results for the Adobe Experience Dev MCP server.
Security scan results for the Aemet MCP server.
Security scan results for the Affinity Mcp Bridge MCP server.