Unifi (PyPI) MCP Server
unifi-mcp
PyPI
v0.5.2
Published by an unidentified publisher — no publish provenance and no public repository, so the publisher could not be verified and the source cannot be independently located.
Unofficial MCP server for the UniFi Site Manager, Access, and Network APIs
The grade answers one question — how safe is this server for you to adopt — so it is computed in two auditable stages. Nothing below is an opinion or an LLM's guess; every line is a real term the deterministic engine applied, and the same input always yields the same number.
1. Threat score — 100 − 0 = 100. What the published surface and source actually contain:
The deterministic scan raised no scored threat in the surface it inspected — the threat score stayed at 100. Capability observations and advisory notes are recorded but never lower it.
2. Client adoption risk — 100 − 8 = 92. Three small, subtract-only factors that reflect your risk in adopting it — a clean scan proves less on a powerful, unverified or barely-inspectable package, so the grade says so plainly:
| Points | Adoption-risk factor |
|---|---|
| −6 | capability blast radius (high) — client exposure if the model is manipulated |
| −2 | publisher verification (unlinked) — no provenance/repo link, but the shipped source was fully read |
Capability observations and info notes are shown under Findings but never scored.
Open any row's finding below for the file, line and evidence behind a deduction.
Findings 1
high Shell/command execution in server code (unifi_mcp/utils/process_utils.py)MTC-SRC-002
In the server's implementation (`unifi_mcp/utils/process_utils.py:68`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.
Evidence: round process = subprocess.Popen(command, env=env, close_fds=True) # nosec B603 - Popen with explicit env and n
Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.
Location: server unifi_mcp/utils/process_utils.py
Tools 13
Each tool and what it can reach — statically extracted from the published source.
unifi_disable_apno sensitive capabilityunifi_enable_apno sensitive capabilityunifi_get_access_logsno sensitive capabilityunifi_get_access_pointsno sensitive capabilityunifi_get_access_usersno sensitive capabilityunifi_get_clientsno sensitive capabilityunifi_get_devicesno sensitive capabilityunifi_get_sitesno sensitive capabilityunifi_get_statisticsno sensitive capabilityunifi_get_wlansno sensitive capability
Show 3 more tools ↓
unifi_restart_deviceno sensitive capabilityunifi_set_access_scheduleno sensitive capabilityunifi_unlock_doorno sensitive capability
What this scan could not see
- Tools were statically extracted from the published source (13 recovered), not enumerated from a running server. Tool-poisoning, Unicode-smuggling, capability and toxic-flow analysis ran on this inferred surface, but a mis-parsed registration could be missed or mis-attributed, so tool-derived findings are capped below “confirmed”. To grade the real runtime surface, scan the running server: --command "npx -y <package>".
Versions 7
Scan history per published version. The engine is deterministic — the same version always yields the same score, so a changed score means the package itself changed.
| Version | Score | Findings | Engine | Scanned |
|---|---|---|---|---|
v0.5.2 latest |
A 92/100 | 1 | 1.13.0 | 2026-09-01 |
v0.5.1 |
A 92/100 | 1 | 1.13.0 | 2026-08-30 |
v0.5.0 |
A 92/100 | 1 | 1.13.0 | 2026-08-29 |
v0.4.0 |
A 92/100 | 1 | 1.13.0 | 2026-08-25 |
v0.3.1 |
A 92/100 | 1 | 1.12.1 | 2026-08-18 |
Show 2 more versions ↓
v0.3.0 |
A 92/100 | 1 | 1.12.1 | 2026-08-13 |
v0.2.8 |
A 92/100 | 1 | 1.12.1 | 2026-07-27 |
Embed this score
Show this server's live Trust Score in your README, docs or website. The badge is served straight from the registry and updates automatically after every rescan — no API key needed. It links back to this page, so anyone who sees the grade can also read the findings behind it instead of taking a number on faith.
Verify this score yourself
The score above is reproducible: the same package version always yields the same result. Run it locally or over the free API — no account, no LLM, fully deterministic.
npx mcptrustchecker scan unifi-mcp --online --registry pypiOther implementations of Unifi 8
Independent packages implementing the same tool, scanned with the same engine. Compare all 9 side by side →
UniFi semantic analysis MCP server — fleet health, anomaly detection, cross-site analytics on top of Cloud API
Model Context Protocol server for the UniFi Local Network Integration API.
Model Context Protocol server for UniFi Network API with comprehensive tool documentation and web server for OpenAPI specs
MCP server for the UniFi Network API — manage and optimise your network like a specialist
A Model Context Protocol (MCP) server for UniFi Network API
An MCP server that leverages official UniFi API
More in Developer Tools
Hotel booking MCP server — 300K+ properties, real confirmation numbers, loyalty programs. Builders monetize every booking via Stripe Connect. The first MCP server that completes real hotel reservations inside AI conversations.
Manage AdGuard Home through AI assistants
Read-only Azure DevOps for MCP clients using only your existing browser session — no PAT, no Azure CLI. Browse work items, pull requests, comments, attachments and Artifacts feeds across every project, repo and feed you can access.
MCP server for Adobe Experience Manager Assets integration development
Servidor MCP para el tiempo oficial de España (API pública OpenData de AEMET). Predicción, observación y avisos como herramientas MCP tipadas.
A standalone MCP stdio bridge for Affinity by Canva's local MCP SSE server.