Tui Testing MCP Server

tui-testing-mcp npm v0.3.3 Source verified

Published by whit3rabbit — publish provenance cryptographically ties this package to that repository. That is proof of origin, not an official vendor package.

MCP server for testing terminal UIs and interactive CLIs across Rust, Go, Python, Node, and raw binaries

Trust grade
A
94/100
Last scanned get badge →
Trust
A · 94/100
Adoption risk for you: the threat score, then adjusted down for blast radius, publisher verification and how much the scan could see. Deterministic; every point is auditable.
Capability
High
Blast radius if it went rogue — what the server’s tools could reach. Independent of trust.
Coverage
Source
How much the scan could actually inspect. Shallow coverage is stated, never hidden.
Share this Trust Score
𝕏 Share LinkedIn Reddit
A Why this grade threat 100 − adoption risk = 94/100

The grade answers one question — how safe is this server for you to adopt — so it is computed in two auditable stages. Nothing below is an opinion or an LLM's guess; every line is a real term the deterministic engine applied, and the same input always yields the same number.

1. Threat score — 100 − 0 = 100. What the published surface and source actually contain:

The deterministic scan raised no scored threat in the surface it inspected — the threat score stayed at 100. Capability observations and advisory notes are recorded but never lower it.

2. Client adoption risk — 100 − 6 = 94. Three small, subtract-only factors that reflect your risk in adopting it — a clean scan proves less on a powerful, unverified or barely-inspectable package, so the grade says so plainly:

PointsAdoption-risk factor
−6 capability blast radius (high) — client exposure if the model is manipulated

Capability observations and info notes are shown under Findings but never scored. Open any row's finding below for the file, line and evidence behind a deduction.

Findings 6

high Dynamic evaluation of a non-literal value (dist/security/policy.js)MTC-SRC-010

In the server's implementation (`dist/security/policy.js:59`): Evaluating a runtime value as code (rather than a fixed literal) executes whatever reaches it — a direct RCE primitive, and almost never necessary in legitimate code. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: e(?:.+)?$/, /^--eval(?:=.*)?$/, /^-p(?:.+)?$/, /^--print(?:=.*)?$/, /^-r(?:.+)?$/,

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server dist/security/policy.js

high Dynamic code execution in server code (dist/security/policy.js)MTC-SRC-001

In the server's implementation (`dist/security/policy.js:59`): Evaluating strings as code is the most direct RCE primitive; if any tool input reaches it, the server executes attacker-chosen code. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: e(?:.+)?$/, /^--eval(?:=.*)?$/, /^-p(?:.+)?$/, /^--print(?:=.*)?$/, /^-r(?:.+)?$/,

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server dist/security/policy.js

high Shell/command execution in server code (dist/bridges/microsoft-tui-test/bridge.js)MTC-SRC-002

In the server's implementation (`dist/bridges/microsoft-tui-test/bridge.js:21`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: rt { spawn } from "node:child_process"; import * as fs from "node:fs"; import * as path from "node:path"; import { resol

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server dist/bridges/microsoft-tui-test/bridge.js

high Shell/command execution in server code (dist/runners/index.js)MTC-SRC-002

In the server's implementation (`dist/runners/index.js:4`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: import { spawn } from "child_process"; const MAX_COMMAND_OUTPUT_BYTES = 1024 * 1024; // 1MB per stream export { BinaryR

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server dist/runners/index.js

high Shell/command execution in server code (dist/security/policy.js)MTC-SRC-002

In the server's implementation (`dist/security/policy.js:54`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: \.git[=\s]/, /--exec(?:=.*)?$/, ], // Node can eval arbitrary code or load modules node: [ /

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server dist/security/policy.js

low Shell/command execution in packaging/dev tooling (dist/security/policy.test.js)MTC-SRC-002

In a packaging/dev/install script (shipped, but not the server runtime) (`dist/security/policy.test.js:109`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: Policy, "node", ["-r", "child_process"])).toBe(false); expect(isArgvSafe(allowlistPolicy, "node", ["-rchild_proc

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server dist/security/policy.test.js

Tools 19

Each tool and what it can reach — statically extracted from the published source.

  • assert_at_positionno sensitive capability
  • assert_containsno sensitive capability
  • build_targetno sensitive capability
  • capture_screenno sensitive capability
  • close_sessionno sensitive capability
  • discover_targetsno sensitive capability
  • expect_textno sensitive capability
  • get_cursor_positionno sensitive capability
  • get_lineno sensitive capability
  • get_screen_regionno sensitive capability
Show 9 more tools ↓
  • launch_tuino sensitive capability
  • list_sessionsno sensitive capability
  • resize_sessionno sensitive capability
  • run_microsoft_tui_testno sensitive capability
  • run_target_testsno sensitive capability
  • send_ctrlno sensitive capability
  • send_keysno sensitive capability
  • wait_for_screen_changeno sensitive capability
  • wait_for_screen_stabilityno sensitive capability

What this scan could not see

Versions 1

Scan history per published version. The engine is deterministic — the same version always yields the same score, so a changed score means the package itself changed.

VersionScoreFindingsEngineScanned
v0.3.3 latest A 94/100 6 1.13.0 2026-09-09

Embed this score

Show this server's live Trust Score in your README, docs or website. The badge is served straight from the registry and updates automatically after every rescan — no API key needed. It links back to this page, so anyone who sees the grade can also read the findings behind it instead of taking a number on faith.

MCP Trust Score: A · 94/100
Markdown (GitHub README)
[![MCP Trust Score](https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/tui-testing-mcp/badge.svg)](https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/tui-testing-mcp)
HTML
<a href="https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/tui-testing-mcp"><img src="https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/tui-testing-mcp/badge.svg" alt="MCP Trust Score" height="20"></a>
Prefer shields.io styling? Point it at https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/tui-testing-mcp/badge.json via https://img.shields.io/endpoint?url=…

Verify this score yourself

The score above is reproducible: the same package version always yields the same result. Run it locally or over the free API — no account, no LLM, fully deterministic.

npx mcptrustchecker scan tui-testing-mcp --online

Use the free API → How scoring works

More in Developer Tools