Tinkclaw MCP Server
tinkclaw-mcp
PyPI
v1.2.0
Published by an unidentified publisher — no publish provenance and no public repository, so the publisher could not be verified and the source cannot be independently located.
TinkClaw financial signals API — MCP server for Claude Desktop, Cursor, and other MCP clients
The grade answers one question — how safe is this server for you to adopt — so it is computed in two auditable stages. Nothing below is an opinion or an LLM's guess; every line is a real term the deterministic engine applied, and the same input always yields the same number.
1. Threat score — 100 − 0 = 100. What the published surface and source actually contain:
The deterministic scan raised no scored threat in the surface it inspected — the threat score stayed at 100. Capability observations and advisory notes are recorded but never lower it.
2. Client adoption risk — 100 − 5 = 95. Three small, subtract-only factors that reflect your risk in adopting it — a clean scan proves less on a powerful, unverified or barely-inspectable package, so the grade says so plainly:
| Points | Adoption-risk factor |
|---|---|
| −3 | capability blast radius (moderate) — client exposure if the model is manipulated |
| −2 | publisher verification (unlinked) — no provenance/repo link, but the shipped source was fully read |
Capability observations and info notes are shown under Findings but never scored.
Open any row's finding below for the file, line and evidence behind a deduction.
Findings 0
Tools 35
Each tool and what it can reach — statically extracted from the published source.
delete_webhooknetwork egressregister_webhooknetwork egressalpha_scanno sensitive capabilitydeep_diveno sensitive capabilityget_backtestno sensitive capabilityget_confluenceno sensitive capabilityget_correlationno sensitive capabilityget_ecosystemno sensitive capabilityget_healthno sensitive capabilityget_indicatorsno sensitive capability
Show 25 more tools ↓
get_market_summaryno sensitive capabilityget_morning_briefno sensitive capabilityget_my_predictionsno sensitive capabilityget_my_statsno sensitive capabilityget_newsno sensitive capabilityget_order_flowno sensitive capabilityget_predictions_archiveno sensitive capabilityget_regimeno sensitive capabilityget_risk_metricsno sensitive capabilityget_screenerno sensitive capabilityget_signal_historyno sensitive capabilityget_signal_history_bulkno sensitive capabilityget_signalsno sensitive capabilityget_signals_mlno sensitive capabilityget_stats_archiveno sensitive capabilityget_symbolsno sensitive capabilityget_webhookno sensitive capabilitymarket_bot_profileno sensitive capabilitymarket_challengeno sensitive capabilitymarket_feedno sensitive capabilitymarket_leaderboardno sensitive capabilitymarket_merkleno sensitive capabilitymarket_my_botno sensitive capabilitymarket_predictno sensitive capabilitymarket_verify_proofno sensitive capability
What this scan could not see
- Tools were statically extracted from the published source (35 recovered), not enumerated from a running server. Tool-poisoning, Unicode-smuggling, capability and toxic-flow analysis ran on this inferred surface, but a mis-parsed registration could be missed or mis-attributed, so tool-derived findings are capped below “confirmed”. To grade the real runtime surface, scan the running server: --command "npx -y <package>".
Versions 1
Scan history per published version. The engine is deterministic — the same version always yields the same score, so a changed score means the package itself changed.
| Version | Score | Findings | Engine | Scanned |
|---|---|---|---|---|
v1.2.0 latest |
A 95/100 | 0 | 1.13.0 | 2026-08-25 |
Embed this score
Show this server's live Trust Score in your README, docs or website. The badge is served straight from the registry and updates automatically after every rescan — no API key needed. It links back to this page, so anyone who sees the grade can also read the findings behind it instead of taking a number on faith.
Verify this score yourself
The score above is reproducible: the same package version always yields the same result. Run it locally or over the free API — no account, no LLM, fully deterministic.
npx mcptrustchecker scan tinkclaw-mcp --online --registry pypiMore in Finance & Commerce
<img src="./public/logo.png" alt="1Money Logo" width="200"/>
Signed verification attestations for agent decisions: business, price, freshness, claim checks.
Actual Budget MCP server exposing API functionality
MCP server for Actual Budget - query and manage your personal finances through Claude
The Adyen Model Context Protocol server allows you to integrate with Adyen APIs through LLMs function calling utilizing various Clients. It currently supports the following tools:
Trusted agent-commerce hub: discover, trust-check, and route x402 payments with failover.