Tick (kpihx) MCP Server

tick-mcp PyPI v0.2.0

Published by kpihx — no publish provenance, so origin is unverified, but the source is public: the repository link below is self-declared yet readable, so you can inspect the code before adopting it.

Trust grade
A
93/100
Last scanned get badge →
Trust
A · 93/100
Adoption risk for you: the threat score, then adjusted down for blast radius, publisher verification and how much the scan could see. Deterministic; every point is auditable.
Capability
High
Blast radius if it went rogue — what the server’s tools could reach. Independent of trust.
Coverage
Source
How much the scan could actually inspect. Shallow coverage is stated, never hidden.
A Why this grade threat 100 − adoption risk = 93/100

The grade answers one question — how safe is this server for you to adopt — so it is computed in two auditable stages. Nothing below is an opinion or an LLM's guess; every line is a real term the deterministic engine applied, and the same input always yields the same number.

1. Threat score — 100 − 0 = 100. What the published surface and source actually contain:

The deterministic scan raised no scored threat in the surface it inspected — the threat score stayed at 100. Capability observations and advisory notes are recorded but never lower it.

2. Client adoption risk — 100 − 7 = 93. Three small, subtract-only factors that reflect your risk in adopting it — a clean scan proves less on a powerful, unverified or barely-inspectable package, so the grade says so plainly:

PointsAdoption-risk factor
−6 capability blast radius (high) — client exposure if the model is manipulated
−1 publisher verification (public source) — no provenance, but the source is public and inspectable

Capability observations and info notes are shown under Findings but never scored. Open any row's finding below for the file, line and evidence behind a deduction.

Findings 1

high Shell/command execution in server code (src/tick_mcp/config.py)MTC-SRC-002

In the server's implementation (`src/tick_mcp/config.py:247`): Spawning a shell/process is command-execution capability; with unsanitized tool input it is command injection / RCE. This is read from the code itself — not from the tool description — so a poisoned server cannot hide it behind honest-looking metadata.

Evidence: try: result = subprocess.run( ["zsh", "-l", "-c", f'printf "%s" "${{{key}}}"'], captur

Fix: Review this call path: confirm it never receives unsanitized tool input, constrain it, or remove it. Treat a server whose code reaches these sinks as high-capability regardless of what its tools claim.

Location: server src/tick_mcp/config.py

Tools 71

Each tool and what it can reach — statically extracted from the published source.

  • batch_create_tasksno sensitive capability
  • batch_delete_tasksno sensitive capability
  • batch_update_tasksno sensitive capability
  • build_recurrence_ruleno sensitive capability
  • build_reminderno sensitive capability
  • check_v2_availabilityno sensitive capability
  • complete_taskno sensitive capability
  • create_habitno sensitive capability
  • create_projectno sensitive capability
  • create_subtaskno sensitive capability
Show 61 more tools ↓
  • create_tagno sensitive capability
  • create_taskno sensitive capability
  • delete_habitno sensitive capability
  • delete_projectno sensitive capability
  • delete_query_presetno sensitive capability
  • delete_tagno sensitive capability
  • delete_taskno sensitive capability
  • events_of_todayno sensitive capability
  • full_syncno sensitive capability
  • get_all_tasksno sensitive capability
  • get_completed_tasksno sensitive capability
  • get_deleted_tasksno sensitive capability
  • get_focus_statsno sensitive capability
  • get_habit_recordsno sensitive capability
  • get_inboxno sensitive capability
  • get_productivity_statsno sensitive capability
  • get_project_detailno sensitive capability
  • get_project_tasksno sensitive capability
  • get_task_detailno sensitive capability
  • get_user_statusno sensitive capability
  • habit_checkinno sensitive capability
  • list_columnsno sensitive capability
  • list_habit_sectionsno sensitive capability
  • list_habitsno sensitive capability
  • list_project_foldersno sensitive capability
  • list_projectsno sensitive capability
  • list_query_presetsno sensitive capability
  • list_tagsno sensitive capability
  • manage_columnsno sensitive capability
  • manage_project_foldersno sensitive capability
  • merge_tagsno sensitive capability
  • move_tasksno sensitive capability
  • overdue_tasksno sensitive capability
  • priority_dashboardno sensitive capability
  • query_agendano sensitive capability
  • query_foldersno sensitive capability
  • query_notesno sensitive capability
  • query_projectsno sensitive capability
  • query_task_historyno sensitive capability
  • query_tasksno sensitive capability
  • rename_tagno sensitive capability
  • reopen_taskno sensitive capability
  • run_query_presetno sensitive capability
  • save_query_presetno sensitive capability
  • set_subtask_parentno sensitive capability
  • stale_tasksno sensitive capability
  • tasks_of_todayno sensitive capability
  • ticktick_guideno sensitive capability
  • upcoming_tasksno sensitive capability
  • update_habitno sensitive capability
  • update_projectno sensitive capability
  • update_tagno sensitive capability
  • update_taskno sensitive capability
  • verified_assign_project_folderno sensitive capability
  • verified_batch_moveno sensitive capability
  • verified_create_projectno sensitive capability
  • verified_move_tasksno sensitive capability
  • verified_set_subtask_parentno sensitive capability
  • week_agendano sensitive capability
  • week_overviewno sensitive capability
  • workspace_mapno sensitive capability

What this scan could not see

Versions 1

Scan history per published version. The engine is deterministic — the same version always yields the same score, so a changed score means the package itself changed.

VersionScoreFindingsEngineScanned
v0.2.0 latest A 93/100 1 1.9.0 2026-07-23

Embed this score

Show this server's live Trust Score in your README, docs or website. The badge is served straight from the registry and updates automatically after every rescan — no API key needed. It links back to this page, so anyone who sees the grade can also read the findings behind it instead of taking a number on faith.

MCP Trust Score: A · 93/100
Markdown (GitHub README)
[![MCP Trust Score](https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/tick-mcp/badge.svg)](https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/tick-mcp)
HTML
<a href="https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/tick-mcp"><img src="https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/tick-mcp/badge.svg" alt="MCP Trust Score" height="20"></a>
Prefer shields.io styling? Point it at https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/tick-mcp/badge.json via https://img.shields.io/endpoint?url=…

Verify this score yourself

The score above is reproducible: the same package version always yields the same result. Run it locally or over the free API — no account, no LLM, fully deterministic.

npx mcptrustchecker scan tick-mcp --online --registry pypi

Use the free API → How scoring works

Other implementations of Tick 1

Independent packages implementing the same tool, scanned with the same engine. Compare all 2 side by side →

More in Productivity & Workflow