Threatlocker MCP Server
threatlocker-mcp
PyPI
v0.2.1
Published by space-c0wboy — no publish provenance, so origin is unverified, but the source is public: the repository link below is self-declared yet readable, so you can inspect the code before adopting it.
MCP server for the ThreatLocker Portal API
The grade answers one question — how safe is this server for you to adopt — so it is computed in two auditable stages. Nothing below is an opinion or an LLM's guess; every line is a real term the deterministic engine applied, and the same input always yields the same number.
1. Threat score — 100 − 0 = 100. What the published surface and source actually contain:
The deterministic scan raised no scored threat in the surface it inspected — the threat score stayed at 100. Capability observations and advisory notes are recorded but never lower it.
2. Client adoption risk — 100 − 4 = 96. Three small, subtract-only factors that reflect your risk in adopting it — a clean scan proves less on a powerful, unverified or barely-inspectable package, so the grade says so plainly:
| Points | Adoption-risk factor |
|---|---|
| −3 | capability blast radius (moderate) — client exposure if the model is manipulated |
| −1 | publisher verification (public source) — no provenance, but the source is public and inspectable |
Capability observations and info notes are shown under Findings but never scored.
Open any row's finding below for the file, line and evidence behind a deduction.
Findings 0
Tools 30
Each tool and what it can reach — statically extracted from the published source.
action_log_get_file_download_details_by_idingests untrusted inputapproval_request_get_file_download_details_by_idingests untrusted inputaction_log_get_by_id_v2no sensitive capabilityapplication_get_by_idno sensitive capabilityapplication_get_matching_listno sensitive capabilityapproval_request_get_by_idno sensitive capabilityapproval_request_get_countno sensitive capabilityapproval_request_get_permit_application_by_idno sensitive capabilityapproval_request_get_storage_approval_by_idno sensitive capabilityapproval_request_update_for_ignoreno sensitive capability
Show 20 more tools ↓
approval_request_update_for_rejectno sensitive capabilityapproval_request_update_for_take_ownershipno sensitive capabilitycomputer_disable_protectionno sensitive capabilitycomputer_enable_protectionno sensitive capabilitycomputer_get_by_all_parametersno sensitive capabilitycomputer_get_for_edit_by_idno sensitive capabilitycomputer_group_get_dropdown_by_organization_idno sensitive capabilitycomputer_move_to_other_organizationno sensitive capabilitycomputer_update_baseline_rescanno sensitive capabilitycomputer_update_for_editno sensitive capabilitycomputer_update_maintenance_modeno sensitive capabilitymaintenance_mode_end_by_idno sensitive capabilitymaintenance_mode_get_by_computer_idno sensitive capabilitymaintenance_mode_insertno sensitive capabilityonline_devices_get_by_parametersno sensitive capabilitypolicy_get_by_idno sensitive capabilitysystem_audit_get_by_parametersno sensitive capabilitysystem_audit_get_for_health_centerno sensitive capabilitytag_get_by_idno sensitive capabilitytag_get_dropdown_options_by_organization_idno sensitive capability
What this scan could not see
- Tools were statically extracted from the published source (30 recovered), not enumerated from a running server. Tool-poisoning, Unicode-smuggling, capability and toxic-flow analysis ran on this inferred surface, but a mis-parsed registration could be missed or mis-attributed, so tool-derived findings are capped below “confirmed”. To grade the real runtime surface, scan the running server: --command "npx -y <package>".
Versions 1
Scan history per published version. The engine is deterministic — the same version always yields the same score, so a changed score means the package itself changed.
| Version | Score | Findings | Engine | Scanned |
|---|---|---|---|---|
v0.2.1 latest |
A 96/100 | 0 | 1.13.0 | 2026-08-25 |
Embed this score
Show this server's live Trust Score in your README, docs or website. The badge is served straight from the registry and updates automatically after every rescan — no API key needed. It links back to this page, so anyone who sees the grade can also read the findings behind it instead of taking a number on faith.
Verify this score yourself
The score above is reproducible: the same package version always yields the same result. Run it locally or over the free API — no account, no LLM, fully deterministic.
npx mcptrustchecker scan threatlocker-mcp --online --registry pypiMore in Security & Testing
The Stripe Agent Toolkit enables popular agent frameworks including LangChain and Vercel's AI SDK to integrate with Stripe APIs through function calling.
MCP (Model Context Protocol) server for AgentGate. Enables Claude and other MCP-compatible AI assistants to request approvals.
Scan any website for AI agent readiness, payment protocols, and discovery endpoints
MCP server for aigently security guardrails — reads static catalog-data JSON, zero API dependency
Governed threat modeling, code threat verification, traceability & compliance, as MCP tools.
Governed threat modeling, code threat verification, traceability & compliance, as MCP tools.