Testrail (tenbarrel6) MCP Server

@tenbarrel6/testrail-mcp npm v1.0.4

Published by @tenbarrel6 — no publish provenance, so origin is unverified, but the source is public: the repository link below is self-declared yet readable, so you can inspect the code before adopting it.

TestRail MCP Server with TestRail API v9.7.2 support

Trust grade
A
96/100
Last scanned get badge →
Trust
A · 96/100
Adoption risk for you: the threat score, then adjusted down for blast radius, publisher verification and how much the scan could see. Deterministic; every point is auditable.
Capability
Moderate
Blast radius if it went rogue — what the server’s tools could reach. Independent of trust.
Coverage
Source
How much the scan could actually inspect. Shallow coverage is stated, never hidden.
Share this Trust Score
𝕏 Share LinkedIn Reddit
A Why this grade threat 100 − adoption risk = 96/100

The grade answers one question — how safe is this server for you to adopt — so it is computed in two auditable stages. Nothing below is an opinion or an LLM's guess; every line is a real term the deterministic engine applied, and the same input always yields the same number.

1. Threat score — 100 − 0 = 100. What the published surface and source actually contain:

The deterministic scan raised no scored threat in the surface it inspected — the threat score stayed at 100. Capability observations and advisory notes are recorded but never lower it.

2. Client adoption risk — 100 − 4 = 96. Three small, subtract-only factors that reflect your risk in adopting it — a clean scan proves less on a powerful, unverified or barely-inspectable package, so the grade says so plainly:

PointsAdoption-risk factor
−3 capability blast radius (moderate) — client exposure if the model is manipulated
−1 publisher verification (public source) — no provenance, but the source is public and inspectable

Capability observations and info notes are shown under Findings but never scored. Open any row's finding below for the file, line and evidence behind a deduction.

Findings 0

✓ No findings. The scan raised nothing on this surface — see Coverage for how deep it could look.

Tools 77

Each tool and what it can reach — statically extracted from the published source.

  • get_attachmentingests untrusted input
  • add_attachment_to_caseno sensitive capability
  • add_attachment_to_planno sensitive capability
  • add_attachment_to_plan_entryno sensitive capability
  • add_attachment_to_resultno sensitive capability
  • add_attachment_to_runno sensitive capability
  • add_caseno sensitive capability
  • add_milestoneno sensitive capability
  • add_planno sensitive capability
  • add_plan_entryno sensitive capability
Show 67 more tools ↓
  • add_resultno sensitive capability
  • add_result_for_caseno sensitive capability
  • add_resultsno sensitive capability
  • add_results_for_casesno sensitive capability
  • add_runno sensitive capability
  • add_run_to_plan_entryno sensitive capability
  • add_sectionno sensitive capability
  • add_suiteno sensitive capability
  • close_planno sensitive capability
  • close_runno sensitive capability
  • copy_cases_to_sectionno sensitive capability
  • delete_attachmentno sensitive capability
  • delete_caseno sensitive capability
  • delete_casesno sensitive capability
  • delete_milestoneno sensitive capability
  • delete_planno sensitive capability
  • delete_plan_entryno sensitive capability
  • delete_runno sensitive capability
  • delete_run_from_plan_entryno sensitive capability
  • delete_sectionno sensitive capability
  • get_attachments_for_caseno sensitive capability
  • get_attachments_for_planno sensitive capability
  • get_attachments_for_plan_entryno sensitive capability
  • get_attachments_for_runno sensitive capability
  • get_attachments_for_testno sensitive capability
  • get_caseno sensitive capability
  • get_case_fieldsno sensitive capability
  • get_case_statusesno sensitive capability
  • get_case_typesno sensitive capability
  • get_casesno sensitive capability
  • get_configsno sensitive capability
  • get_current_userno sensitive capability
  • get_history_for_caseno sensitive capability
  • get_milestoneno sensitive capability
  • get_milestonesno sensitive capability
  • get_planno sensitive capability
  • get_plansno sensitive capability
  • get_prioritiesno sensitive capability
  • get_projectno sensitive capability
  • get_projectsno sensitive capability
  • get_result_fieldsno sensitive capability
  • get_resultsno sensitive capability
  • get_results_for_caseno sensitive capability
  • get_results_for_runno sensitive capability
  • get_runno sensitive capability
  • get_runsno sensitive capability
  • get_sectionno sensitive capability
  • get_sectionsno sensitive capability
  • get_statusesno sensitive capability
  • get_suiteno sensitive capability
  • get_suitesno sensitive capability
  • get_templatesno sensitive capability
  • get_testno sensitive capability
  • get_testsno sensitive capability
  • get_userno sensitive capability
  • get_user_by_emailno sensitive capability
  • get_usersno sensitive capability
  • move_cases_to_sectionno sensitive capability
  • move_sectionno sensitive capability
  • update_caseno sensitive capability
  • update_milestoneno sensitive capability
  • update_planno sensitive capability
  • update_plan_entryno sensitive capability
  • update_runno sensitive capability
  • update_run_in_plan_entryno sensitive capability
  • update_sectionno sensitive capability
  • update_suiteno sensitive capability

What this scan could not see

Versions 1

Scan history per published version. The engine is deterministic — the same version always yields the same score, so a changed score means the package itself changed.

VersionScoreFindingsEngineScanned
v1.0.4 latest A 96/100 0 1.13.0 2026-09-07

Embed this score

Show this server's live Trust Score in your README, docs or website. The badge is served straight from the registry and updates automatically after every rescan — no API key needed. It links back to this page, so anyone who sees the grade can also read the findings behind it instead of taking a number on faith.

MCP Trust Score: A · 96/100
Markdown (GitHub README)
[![MCP Trust Score](https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/tenbarrel6-testrail-mcp/badge.svg)](https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/tenbarrel6-testrail-mcp)
HTML
<a href="https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/tenbarrel6-testrail-mcp"><img src="https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/tenbarrel6-testrail-mcp/badge.svg" alt="MCP Trust Score" height="20"></a>
Prefer shields.io styling? Point it at https://mcptrustchecker.com/registry/tenbarrel6-testrail-mcp/badge.json via https://img.shields.io/endpoint?url=…

Verify this score yourself

The score above is reproducible: the same package version always yields the same result. Run it locally or over the free API — no account, no LLM, fully deterministic.

npx mcptrustchecker scan @tenbarrel6/testrail-mcp --online

Use the free API → How scoring works

Other implementations of Testrail 8

Independent packages implementing the same tool, scanned with the same engine. Compare all 9 side by side →

More in Security & Testing